Another Splashing Thread:

Why use VLC or MPV when pic related exist? Only Windows users have the benefit of using the best video player available. I feel sorry for loonixtards and applefags.

Attached: based_splash.png (657x403, 166K)

Looks gay.

I'm actually interested. Why should I use this over mpv?

Sell me on splash op.
>Vs mpv
>Vs mpc
>Vs pot

Dildo connecting two anuses

Does it support things like EasyReshade or things like that?

it just werks out of the box.
no extra codecs needed. it is free. comes out of the box with screenshot support, video conversion support, tuner support, interpolation, real-time voice sub lector.

accept once and for all that you are the only one who uses this trash

mpv does all this ootb and still hasn't bloatware

>next one

mpv was made with youtube-dl in mind

Even as a Windows user, there's a 0 percent change I'm switching away from mpv.
I use mpv for the same reasons I use Vim.
I use a number of different operating systems.
They're written in a portable manner, without sacrificing efficiency, by using modern libraries and features of their languages.
I configure 1 tool, 1 time, and it works forever, and exactly the same on every computer I use.
The UI/UX is good.

It's a really tough competitor to beat.
This gay lookin shit has more UI than video content. Not really appealing to me personally since I'm more interested in watching videos, and having a fast media player than having a UI at all.

> out-of-the-box
Has to configure mpv to do all of that.

>next-one

I love Mirillis software, but I honestly think Splash is usless for anyone who uses computers a lot.

Even for avg users, most use VLC and understand how to use it reasonably well.

For more power-user oriented people, Splash just doesn't offer enough. No porting is an issue, and it seems not to have many options that make it stand out to someone who already uses MPV or even VLC.

>it just werks out of the box.
Yea, MPC does exactly the same thing.

no, you don't. you don't even have to 'install' anything and the picture quality is superior.

A few pros and cons:

Pro:
It looks good, like shit-hot imo. I love the simplistic material-like appearance.
Easy to get going, no overwhelming config options, very newb friendly.
Subtitle options are simple and pretty nice, good amount of options.
easy audio sync option.

Con:
Hardly any options for screen format
shit for command use
winderhers only
A lot of the options aren't very self-explanatory despite them being extremely basic.
right-click options are pretty shit desu... No audio speed settings, no format settings, useless shit like "about"...

>Why use VLC or MPV when pic related exist?
with your non-free software

Attached: 1518536902651.jpg (480x451, 57K)

Vim is a real piece of shit under the hood

Attached: pyXKYW9NhPs7jemBir9Rfz48oUt.jpg (1000x1500, 252K)

>VLC
LGPLv2.1+

>mpv
Combination of GPLv2+, LGPLv2.1+, and GPLv3.

> mpvfags being this delusional.

>google mpv
>click 1st link
>download zip archive
>extract it
>drag n drop or right click open with mpv.exe
you don't even have to right click and all that if you run install.bat but that's besides the point. you don't need to do any configuration to watch videos. also, i'm yet to find a video codec that wasn't supported by it.

>cant output hi10 right
a fucking meme