OFFICIAL NVIDIA GEFORCE 1660ti REVIEW THREAD

590 BTFOOOOO

>6GB
Useless for those who are using 1440p and higher monitors.

Imagine being so shit at making GPU's you need a high end 250W part with HBM2 just to compete with a little mid range card.

This card is what I expect mainstream Navi to land at. Except probably $200-250 instead.

Shut up, brainlet.
You're forgetting the amazing "untapped computation potential" of Vega and the "professional applications"

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH.

I never realized the 2080 was almost as efficient as a fucking 1050Ti. That's impressive.

nice meme

It's relative performance gets even better with 1440p fuck off

>still slower than a vega 56 for the same price
So why should I get the 1660TI?

HOLD ME AMDBROS

Fucking kek

Attached: 1550846503985.png (500x254, 21K)

Attached: download.jpg (1280x720, 91K)

>for the same price
pooga costs $400 rajeesh

But I don't own a GT 590.

huh?

newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814137263

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

How can one company be so incompetent? AMD is at least 5 years behind behind when it comes to power consumption. 7nm would at best be a 30% improvement on the 590.

Oh you are right, it costs $560

>$558.99
LMAO

Bros this can't be happening ....

$250 Vega 56 Soon™ Edition

Attached: just wait.png (1184x237, 26K)

Looks like that sold out pretty quickly. It was $279 a few minutes ago.

AMD bros... not like this...

Attached: 4563548343253.png (653x726, 34K)

VEGA56 with OC and unlocked power consumption is almost on 1080ti level of performance.

IT'S OVER AMD IS FINISHED

Attached: it's beautiful.jpg (343x218, 43K)

They killed their KCD benchmark, so this is the only good game left.

Attached: tw3.png (686x960, 81K)

>1080p
is this 2008?

Vega 56 sold for ~$270 yesterday on newegg.

FUCK

nowinstock.net/computers/videocards/amd/rxvega56/

Here's your cheap Vega 56, bro.

Attached: image.png (1189x726, 115K)

>tfw just bought a rx 590
a-at least it looks nice...

>no performance per watt improvement from pascal to turing
Really makes you think.

>1080p+gaymworks
just buy goyim.

Attached: aoeu.png (602x421, 166K)

Similar to other nVidia release of this generation, a trash pricing. You could buy a brand new 1070ti for $250 @ microcenters for months. Or slightly ~$300 in many places. 1070ti shits on this card.

You have to be literally retardet to buy a housefire 56

Attached: 00000.jpg (2000x1900, 569K)

>brand new 1070 Ti
>$250-300
Source: my ass

>im a dumb nigger who only buys bit coin inflated price please rape my face

>let's release 1070 again

>Buying Pascal when it gets absolutely destroyed in modern games

You must be some kind of special retard I guess

Attached: 107044.png (678x400, 28K)

Price?

>$250 Vega 56
>$250 1070 Ti

Attached: 1464819568425.png (653x726, 42K)

>cherrypicking benchmarks

Attached: 1496098972845.png (882x758, 316K)

Turing DESTROYS Pascal, stay mad AYYMDPOORFAGS

Nice edit

Did the 960 shit itself completely here or did they just not even try to run it

It's a cold winter bros. The vega 56 will keep you warm while you game. Nvidia BTFO.

They didn't run it I guess, it's straight from the website

images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph13973/107044.png

Yeah Turing is actually a vastly improved architecture over Pascal. It's just been marred by Nvidia's gambit to include RT/Tensor stuff on all the cards.

Had they released dies at these sizes packed with nothing but CUDA cores turing cards would have been absolute monsters.

Price cuts from AyyMD when? They have NOTHING new to compete until July (if they don't delay shit again)

Yesterday

Attached: 105044.png (1240x42, 11K)

they cut vega 56 prices today
285 EUR

>july
Try next year

>blower
Lol

weird, isn't 590 costs 300 something still?

>July 2020
FTFY

>To clarify, the current Radeon RX Vega 56 promotion is not a price drop.
forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2019/02/21/amd-drops-radeon-vega-56-to-279-to-fight-nvidias-gtx-1660-ti/#4cfe1f3637a2

not that there is that many of them, they want to sell as many as they can not to leave older gens like nvidia did

Tbh I don't know. Maybe a 'fake' sales trick or something.

> What's more interesting is the question of where this puts AMD's RX 590 in the stack. The Vega 56 is a decidedly stronger performer than RX 590, often besting it by 35 percent or more at 1440p when average framerates are analyzed. But both are now $279. Pretty easy decision.
$200 RX 590?

My 2060 is based and this 2660ti seems very based too

but I just paid 260 usd for it...

>open radeon settings
>click Auto Undervolt
>shave off 50w or more from power consumption from any Vega card while having virtually the same performance

This is what the tech "press" won't tell you about.

>crashes
this is what the shills won't tell you about

just undervolt it bro
just wait for the good drivers bro
just wait

Just wait for a $250 Vega 56
Just wait for a $250 Radeon VII
Just wait for Navi
Just wait for Navi+

Do they ever buy one video card from AMD?

I'd rather spend countless hours and months undervolting and waiting for good drivers than pay the premium nvidia price.

Well said, AMD bro!

Attached: download.png (528x321, 131K)

1080fags BTFO. Pascal on suicide watch holy shit!

Attached: RSS_1080p.png (1326x1225, 80K)

undervolt.

>Meanwhile, taking a look at power efficiency, it’s interesting to note that for the GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA has been able to hold the line on power consumption: performance has gone up versus the GTX 1060 6GB, but card power consumption hasn’t. Thanks to this, the GTX 1660 Ti is not just 36% faster, it’s 36% percent more efficient as well. The other Turing cards have seen their own efficiency gains as well, but with their TDPs all drifting up, this is the largest (and purest) efficiency gain we’ve seen to date, and probably the best metric thus far for evaluating Turing’s power efficiency against Pascal’s.

DAM SON

How does Nvidia keep doing it?

Suddenly amdrones don't care about power efficiency.

What if nvidia released a 1960?

Nvidia have money.
Because nobody wants to buy AMD cards. People just love to wait.

>AMD Fanboy: My time is worthless

Yeah we figured.

No one bought graphics cards for that. It was about price performance.

it's funny seeing the same drones who spammed delid this about the 9900k say that power consumption doesnt matter itt. the eternal amd poorfag cope i guess

Attached: 2ae8df7c0d22638e352ea548c5da20bd2ffae4a5cbfd24692d713cf7d3b2c7f6.jpg (125x47, 2K)

see

I own a R9 290,I really want to get a 1660ti,imagine the money I would save on my electric bill.

OY VEY GOY IT ONLY HAS 6GB OF VRAM
YOU NEED 16GB FOR GAMES! BUY THE RADEON 7 GOY

Suddenly, performance per watt doesn't matter!

What is she thinking right now?

Attached: 000''.jpg (210x247, 12K)

"From what angle i need to whip the R&D to get Navi going?"

>Why didn't I take the Intel job?

Radeon VII+ with 32GB of HBM2 for "productivity" tasks.
Fuck games.

Why would I care about that? I run an old hot Geforce. The government pays my bills.

The RX 590 is still enough for minecraft and strategy games right? RIGHT?
I bought it literally yesterday.

400w navi

I'd rather wait a couple of year for Navi than buy any novideo crap.

Attached: justwaitfornavi.jpg (1080x1397, 154K)