Amazon Plane Crash

>Texas
>bottom of the ocean

Attached: 1520559634678.jpg (645x773, 62K)

all those dildos...

Bane?

Airbus.

>cleanup crew finds your dragon dildo

Attached: 1528508805281.png (1070x601, 507K)

guess those wagecages aren't that great at the "employee safety" amazon claimed they were for

Lol every time Texas gets a light rainfall it turns into the bottom of the ocean

Boeings dont crash.

Attached: boeing.png (687x559, 87K)

>living anywhere around texas

unless it's a 767. I've heard they have a thing for tall buildings

>I've heard they have a thing for tall buildings

Attached: muslim pilots.jpg (620x387, 233K)

Only when Allah wills it.

Probably more chink lithium cells

those cant fly.

really makes u think

Attached: pago3km56fi21.jpg (1242x2208, 199K)

>you need to live in Texas for a plane with your package to land there.

Attached: brainlettttt.jpg (800x450, 44K)

Bombardier

Attached: MR-CRJ900_NigelHowarth-AWST.jpg (770x400, 17K)

You're a big wagie

Attached: received_446569686081850.png (1024x576, 639K)

wth would a package destined for somewhere on the east coast be near texas

CIA Niggers

>first one to try Amazon prime gets to stay on my aircraft!

>what is logistics?

>he didn't deliver so good

bezos obviously, he has his hand in everything at amazon and he's rich so I'm angry at him also he should pay more taxes >:((

thats a 787

indeed

What if the product is warehoused in Texas?

Checkmate atheists

>east coast
disgusting

its almost like you don't know anything about how amazon wearhouses work.

how do I not know how their "wear" houses work when I just called the east coast a disgusting place?
Also warehouse * retard

>inflight food on a cargo plane
really makes u think

Attached: 1500637260741.png (363x475, 96K)

Kek

It's honestly the most based place to live

I work in a warehouse. Believe it or not, not every item in existence that Amazon sells will come directly from the nearest warehouse. You’d need several miles worth of storage space in every other state to pull that off.

Faggot

>wearhouses

and I thought that one morning there were amazon packages scattered all over the main intersection in my town was bad

Based and redpilled

BANE?

That's what the plane is for. Humans can't fly by themselves either lok

that cockpit is nice as hell, does the 787 require a 3rd crew member?

Why would someone shoot a man before throwing him out of a plane

>land
And the Oscar for Best Euphemism goes to...

>Your dragon dildo caused the crash
>The weight of six tons of XXXL dragon cock wiggling around caused harmonics in the structure
>The entire dildo and bits of the wooden crate it was shipped in are submitted as evidence in the FAA investigation
>Your address is visible, stamped across a bit of crate, in images put into the public record

Attached: 3EcvwuIxz_Jt8SMtSnT7VwvFNALry3erLWSkb5mPE.png (640x1250, 307K)

At least you can ship packages, who are you?

i hope my cameras survived!

Attached: 1531060312315.png (1186x383, 88K)

$70 shipping kills it

Airbus is safer than Boeing. Pilots know what Im talking about.

well aint this a rare sense of humor to see anymore

Attached: 434EECC1-2136-41C8-A0F6-9254C96C7E65.png (748x786, 749K)

Did Tom Hanks survive?

>Who is to blame for this?
A.I.

I feel like planes should be fully automated by now, or at least fully remote.
Is it really worth risking human lives to assure that in case of emergency a cargo plane doesn't crash into the ocean? Is the dollar amount lost on the plane and cargo worth the lives of humans?
Like I understand that it wouldn't be flawless and that humans have the potential to recover in situations of technical failure, but that only makes sense if you're dealing with passengers. If it's a plane full of amazon shit, let it fall into the sea in the rare instances something goes wrong on a routine flight.

>Boeing 767 crashes in America
You would think after 911 people stop using them outright

planes don't crash that often

Motherfucker

Attached: a53.jpg (500x333, 60K)

No.

That's kind of the point.
If the chance you'll need human intervention is small to begin with, why even consider it worthy of putting a human on board 100% of the time. Especially considering in those instances, the chance of fatality is high, and recovery low.
To me it only makes sense if people are the cargo to begin with. Non-human cargo and the plane itself don't seem worth the risk of the pilot.

Because hijack plane remotely and fly it into buildings is kind of a thing.

it went into a steep diving of 7000ft whatever happened it was very quick for them to not being able to declare pan pan pan..

because the chance of needing human intervention is actually high, and human intervention doesn't mean "accident and the plane will crash"

I mean you could play that both ways and say that remote override would be useful in situations of physical hijack.

This but unironically.

>They demand you testify in court about your order.

>have to prove you can fit the dragon cock in your orifices

They were testing bringing delivery food to planes in flight

Just wait a week for the black box to be read...

>If the chance you'll need human intervention is small to begin with, why even consider it worthy of putting a human on board 100% of the time
1. Because the chance is nonzero, and just because there's no humans onboard the plane doesn't necessarily mean that there will be no casualties in the event of an accident.
2. Because in order to fly commercial passenger flights, you need shit tons of experience having flied already. Where do people get this experience? Cargo planes, buttmunch. And no, we're not going to fully automate passenger planes, nor are we going to relax the requirements.

There was a lot of opium on that plane

Probably some old ass plane.
You see some disturbing shit with passenger planes as they age .. and then they get passed on to cargo carriers.

Capitalism.

LOL boeing

There's your problem

Literally death traps

lmao

>The Chambers County Sheriff's Office said no one survived

Attached: 1470709560026.gif (200x256, 2.06M)

>Airbus: 35 crashes, 28.3 million flights, 0.81 million flights per crash

> Boeing: 251 crashes, 461 million flights, 1.84 million flights per crash

Was being rude necessary?

WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILSON

Based retard.

>Your Boeing bucks are about to expire!!
>Redeem now for great items or continue posting

>Who is to blame for this?
The botnet.

I'd rather go back to having local shops, than having everything posted to you. I live in a city, and we don't have one good computer shop!

sasuga french planes desu

lol why so you can pay 20% more even after overnight postage costs

They pretty much are fully automated. The humans are really only there for extreme situations, and usually takeoff and landing.

which is ironic since humans suck under pressure and since the pilots do little hands on flying, they're less experienced with handling the plane under duress.

Human error / malicious intent is the leading cause of crashes though. Technical failures aren't that common. That Southwest 737 blew out an engine and blew a hole in it's fuselage and landed just fine.

> Would rather go back to a demonstrably worse and more expensive system

No, you wouldn't.

trump administration did it. everyone knows no one hates Bezos as much as trump does.

>55 gallon drum of lube from bad dragon breaks free
>hits a wall and spills lube everywhere
>gets in cockpit
>pilots can't handle flight sticks because they're so slippery
>crashes into Jet fuel factory located next to an elementary school and residential neighborhood
>Texans complain on rocisl media about liberals in California blowing up their schools

-Amazon
-capitalism cutting corners with maintenance
-insufficient government regulation

Attached: 24-aoc-jefferson-paine.w700.h700.jpg (700x700, 117K)

> aware of Texas' lack zoning laws.

Texan spotted

Zoning laws are the comfiest laws.

Attached: bed pepe.png (684x438, 423K)

UUUU

>Queue Men's Wearhouse meme