Why are a lot of people too poor to test it themselves? They said sli gives bad frame pacing, but using old sli bridges and 8x pcie lanes. Then go on to say SLI is trash
>pic related smooth frame time
Why do people bitch about sli
sir please do the needful
980Ti sli user, yeah once I stopped using the old sli bridges and went x299 for 140$ (inb4 AMD user says house fire) it made a difference frame pacing. I see a lot of YouTubers testing with low clock speed cpus or 9900k cuz it’s a gaymer cpu. It has 8 lanes though per slot
What does this even mean?
Its a meme about poos begging people to buy AMD.
There are a lot of other things I'd rather spend money on than graphics cards.
Not that I hate games or anything, but a reasonable mid-range graphics card is enough to play most of the games I'm interested in playing.
Spending so much money just for graphics, just for more layers of shader techniques and resolution, doesn't turn me on.
so SLI requires pcie 3.0 x16?
Or be smart? Jow Forums always acts really poor rather than being smart. Scored these 2 1080Ti off eBay for 600$ together and they paid for themselves mining. The only thing I had to pay for was a 1200w psu and water cooler for the top card since it gets really hot sucking hot air off the back plate of the bottom card. Still worth it idc what Jow Forums bashed on because they don’t own half the hardware they bash on. Also YouTubers are dumb as fuck
That isn’t your rig is it? Also yes if you play high resolution. Maybe at 1440p 60Fps you could get away with 8 lanes, but some games swap textures from ram to gpu frame buffer aggressively so 16 lanes would be best. X99 or x299 would be a great start.
I used to be the same way till I got Vega 64 and 1440P 144 hz and I now I can’t look back.