THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

twitter.com/aschilling/status/1100403505955655680

THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

75W OF POWER EFFICIENCY & PERFORMANCE

Attached: D0VrJB6U0AA1oBo.jpg (1282x711, 49K)

can nvidia fix their naming scheme thx

when are you going to stop spamming the board ?

he's probably an unpaid shill or a marketing bot

>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS WITH NO GPUS AND NO DRIVERS DETECTED

>not waiting for navi
lmaoing @ ur life dude

Attached: justwaitfornavi.jpg (1080x1397, 283K)

>andreas schilling
hmm

If only AMD was relevant in any way in the 3D rendering space.

>Believing the lies of an AYYMD asslicker Scottish cuck living on Swedish welfare

>pushing for hardware slower than previous generation that still costs more
>/aschilling/
>a schilling
>a schill
Really makes you think.

is 1050ti price going to drop?

>sold my 1 year old 1050ti for $150
I'M READY FOR THE NEXT GEN

If this beats the rx 580 for $200 AMD is fucked.

>gddr5
>4gb
>1060, 1660 are 192bit with 6gb
Yet another bandwidth starved $200 part from Nvidia which would easily see 15% better performance if it was appropriately equipped. It doesn't even make sense as the xx50 class is so ferociously destroyed by the xx60 class, there would still be proper segmentation between the price brackets. It's like they always leave AMD that gap to fill instead of taking it themselves.
Why?

Scottish subhuman welfare abuser

>cheaper cooler and faster than 580
Sorry bucko

prove it

Best in class for low power gaming, huge news, tremendous win for Nvidia.

Time will tell

>$249.99 competes with RTX 2070
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO HOW WILL NVIDIAKEKS RECOVER

should i buy a 2060 or 1660ti for 1080p 144fps?

Attached: 7gh3lfz.png (854x640, 609K)

Ive been running 2060 on 1080p 144hz, its good

2060 for sure, but a 2070 will let you hit those frame rates easier.

isn't the ray tracing stuff useless on that card though?

Works fine in metro at 1080p

Keep waiting nerd. 2 1080TIs here in sli and got them free from mining. Only paid 700 for both cards. When ether was 1200$ sold 3 ether and thus I don’t live the AMD slogan
Just wait
J u s t stay dumb, the moment when a single 1080Ti at 2Ghz dumps on Radeon 7 and Navi

What Navi?

>intel cpus are housefire
>but thats okay when amd gpus do it

The RX580 can be had for under $170, where does that put it?

This. It's getting ridiculous. Is it some semitic trick to confuse the consumer?

I decided to not upgrade from gtx 660 until I can get x3 performance for the same price. Is it time yet?

This joke always make me laugh no matter what.

anyone explain the efficiency disparity?

Ironically Raja's going to be burying AMD in 2020

>Proven "leak" liar makes up specs (prediction) month and months before any data, ESPECIALLY PRICING, is available.
>AMDown Syndromes keep parroting it
>"Just wait..."

Anything with an adored logo should be insta banned, I'd sooner trust Indian tech times

>slower
sauce

Neat if this is 1050Ti + 25% performance.

Attached: 1281461061971.jpg (406x536, 20K)

amd is a joke

Attached: power_peak.png (500x810, 50K)

How are you able to type with so much dick in your mouth?

That's missing an entire class of amd cards... The Rx550 pulls like 30w gaming... A little under 50 if you oc, over volt, and run it 100%

This could be perfect for a HTPC build if it's low profile and hopefully the base price is under 200.

I can't see this happening sadly, some executive will go "hey, we can only undercut Nvidia by $50, not a whole $200" and so the 3080 will be $500, the 3070 will be $400 and the 3060 will be $199

>implying that it's any more difficult to type with dick in your mouth

The point is that 1660ti is faster than 1070 while drawing less power. 1660 will be 590 performance while drawing less than 1660ti.

Should be easier, even, when considering it should relieve the stress and improve concentration.

AMD only care about future consoles btw

Vega 56
Competes with GTX 1070 TI and 1080 in certain AMD sponsored games. Undervolted reduces power draw by 20-30w(gamer nexus), meaning worst case Im using 20w more when gaming, which means I could play for at least 3428 hours(143 days) using maximum power draw, if electricity costs 21 cents, to make up for the $60 price difference of Nvidia cards to my Vega 56(the way I bought it).

If I play for an average of 4h a day all year, using maximum power draw, that would mean It would take me 857 days until the Nvidia card would save me money.
Now dont forget that I got the Vega with a 3 game bundle I sold for $90.
If you take that into consideration, by the time a Nvidia gpu would save me money Im already buying a new GPU.
So please STFU with your garbage.

Attached: alexjonesrage.png (800x1100, 1.83M)

Why are you making these "THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA" threads all the time?
I'm seriously starting to think this is a shill, I don't think I've ever seen a AMD one.

Attached: 1550863746892.jpg (351x523, 33K)

my next card will need to have hdmi 2.1

Attached: 428A2B2A-5135-4EBC-B5D1-39DD06B31922.jpg (659x452, 150K)

neither
Vega56 or 1070ti

>stock reference cards
My 580 pulls 79 watts from the wall

Nvidia soon ™

Both are slower

So this is what amdjeet shill looks like.

Free energy, the post.

>2060
>faster than Vega 56
Only in a handful of Gameworks games, sadly.

>I don't think I've ever seen a AMD one.
Because there is no good AMD video card

muh undervolt

at stock, at least that's all the benchmarks I can find
with undervolt it's even better I'd guess

What's wrong with the name?
Are you autistic?

>GTX 580
>GTX 680
>GTX 780
>GTX 980
>GTX 1080
>RTX 2080
>GTX 1660
>what's wrong with it?

Attached: 14308748300173.jpg (521x589, 21K)

>aschilling
You can't make this shit up