4 core CPU in 2019

who are these semen demons?

Hello gamer

Mark my words, gaymen is only going to get worse as they start making games in javascript with a team of 100 pajeets.

Valid point but if you really need that much multi-tasking headroom then a 16-core threadripper split up into 4 VMs is still better.

brooklynactinglab.org/index.php/product/teen-acting-lab/

Attached: 68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f (409x230, 1.54M)

poor froggy

Is it true that girls can tell when a guy only has 4 cores?

Attached: chain_chomp_what.jpg (500x403, 49K)

That's exactly what I decided on in 2018 for muh Gentoo. Do you even use Linux?

Just going to grab a 12 core Zen 2 part when they're out. No need to throw $1500 at a system upgrade when I can get stuff better suited to my tasks for around $650-700. These figures include mobo and RAM.

>consider buying 2700X
>only 10% higher performance per thread than your eight years old 2500K
What's going on with CPUs?

mine has 2 cores and never goes beyond 30% usage...

just go for RISC-V you idiot

Nobody is telling you the truth: ryzen suffers performance loss from shitty RAM. With good low latency RAM it actually has 5% HIGHER single threaded performance of a coffeelake processor. This is why it performs 95% as good as an i7-8700K despite having ~500MHz lower clocks.

digiworthy.com/2018/04/28/ryzen-7-2700x-memory-opt-benches/

>tfw 2500K

Attached: 1544391944654.png (1280x1280, 562K)

I have 2 cores intel pentium and I don't cry about it

>imblygin you need more than this for posting on this autistic tamil cock-sock crocheting board

Attached: 2019-02-28-084416_705x303_scrot.png (705x303, 11K)

Still good.

Only time I need more cores is when rendering and that’s less than 5% of my usage.

based.

My 4690k bottlenecked me years ago, don't delude yourself

*BANG* *BANG* BANG* FBI OPEN UP

>tfw 2 processors with 22 cores each and 4 threads per core
Kill yourself. Right fucking now.

Attached: supreme_champion_duck.png (232x293, 99K)

Same retards every thread
>7700k cope
>Muh RAM speeds on Ryzen = better than Intel!!!!

>be me
>be innocent ram chilling out
>my user opens a chrome browser
>some of my friends suddenly gone
>huh im probably fine
>user opens another tab
>and one more
>and one more
>oh there goes mom's spaghetti
>extensions on his knees
>get eaten alive
>CPU and memory usage at 99.99%

>>Muh RAM speeds on Ryzen = better than Intel!!!!
It literally is. Were you so blinded by jewish tricks you can't see the truth right before your eyes?

Ok. Show me non-cherrypicked proof.
Oh wait, you can't.

My coffee lake core i3 is pretty sufficient. If anything the rx590 is the one getting tasked.

Attached: userbench.png (1489x832, 148K)

no issue here

Attached: specs.png (658x525, 35K)

youtube.com/watch?v=PHBsR1Y68G8

I'm curious what makes this cherry picked? Ryzen's infinity fabric is affected by RAM speed and timings, that's why you see 25% jump in FPS when going from 2133 CL18 to 3400 CL14.

so what will you use the other 7 cores for?
You realise a home users rig at most needs 2 cores, right because you get two virtual cores as well. 8 core cpu's are for servers where they are using a high degree of virtualisation and possibly for use in grids and supercomputers

>2 single core CPUs with no hardware vulnerabilities/speedholes in 2019

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-02-28 at 00.26.46.png (497x287, 84K)

Ibm?

>1.4V
>GTX 1080
>still trailing 7700k in most cases
>Expensive AF RAM, assuming your motherboard can even run it at XMP.
Yikes dude. I didn't think they were that far behind, even with your high speed memory.

The point is spending $200 on RAM instead of $100 with ryzen means you get 95% the performance of an i7-8700K which requires a $200+ tripple fan AIO.

Is spending hundreds more in cooling and electricity bill honestly REALLY worth it for 5% higher FPS?

Too add to this. The people I know who've bought Ryzen, or who I meet have it at default. They don't change to XMP, or higher RAM speeds so they're running at 2,133mhz, and buying 2,400Mhz RAM.

>95% the performance of an 8700k

Attached: ss (2019-02-28 at 10.11.59).jpg (1895x1029, 401K)

I can wait till next year for a full 7nm build.

Attached: .png (862x759, 51K)

Nope, we've known about this since first batch of zen, why do you think a 3400 CL14 2x8 RAM kit is $100 extra compared to a 2133 CL18 2x8 RAM kit?

The only ones who throw in the cheapest RAM possible are 200GE/2200Gfags or those who bought ryzen solely for an efficient 8-core processor (R7 1700 for example only consumes 45W at ~3.0 GHz).

>2600
Oh well at least you tried. A for effort.

who plays a game like far cry over 60 or 75 fps?

There are people who don't overclock K series intel processor too.

Hmmm then explain

>3000Mhz 16gb CL15 is ~$225 AUD
>3600Mhz 16gb CL16 is ~$380
>can't even buy CL16 3400 in AU

Attached: 1542712965408.png (328x408, 83K)

Not me, baby (;

Attached: System.png (1631x931, 181K)

Yes

intel shills still on Jow Forums

Attached: 1548907108512.jpg (398x380, 33K)

I'd be more impressed if it was a Ryzen 7 machine.

Underrated dubspost

>Cherry picked 8700k
>Non cherry picked ryzen

I don't want AMD.

My pity.

stay cucked, trannyfaggot

Mine is currently paired with a Titan XP

Attached: 08e456829afd750f1724bc0fe047023e-d77kvfi.png (420x264, 113K)

AMD sucks.

I also have a Titan Xp :3

>tfw I5 7600k
>Q6600
>4 spares of i7 2700k
>engineering sample i7 seventh gen on my HTPC

Attached: 73191391_p0_cr.jpg (2540x2563, 3.68M)

get back to containment

As long as those cores are running anywhere near 3.2+ gigglehearts you got a fine cpu on your hands that can still play games at 1080p.

See x3470/80 for less than 10$

1080ti is too hard for Ryzen, that's not fair, pair it with something more it's speed like a gtx 1660ti

How much better is the Single core performance of a 2700x vs a 2600?

isn't that Win 7 ram limit?

Attached: Screenshot_20190228-005119.png (1080x1920, 203K)

Badass

Why are /tv/ cunnyposters spreading to other boards?

Not even Jailbait, just Jail

He doesn't have a 100+% overclocked dual core

Attached: IMG_20190228_071208.png (388x434, 71K)

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 140K)

user should I call the fire department

No his VRMs temps are fine, it means they are working harder

Nice.

113 °C in software is very mich on the edge of safe temperatures.

> Have i5 6600k @4.2
> 60FPS gaymen with everything I throw at it at 2560x1080 on a $180 8GB RX580

> Have a 10 year old Thinkpad T400
> C2D P8400 @2.26GHz
> Handles video, shitposting, and general web browsing just fine

In a perfect world all software would take advantage of 4+ cores, but outside of some production software and a handful of videogames we're years away from that.

Fuck you, you faggots recommended me the fucking Ryzen 2200G/2400G.

Threadlet corelet stutter cope

>tfw comfy i7 3820 at 4.7ghz
8 threads are all you need goy

Attached: 273747488261.jpg (1075x1430, 149K)

8 core 16 threads master race
T. 2700x
Try multitasking with quad core u fucknut

absolute mongoloid

No problem with it. I still use a E5450

>Au
Try buying in a real currency, not funny outback Monopoly dollars.

Not bios disabling cores down to single core to get a making tdp

5ghz single core is more than enough for 99% of games and creative apps.

You have to be a youtuber or a architect or work in Hollywood to need more than 1 core get woke

For browsing maybe lmoa

Ooooh, nice; it's even one of the OpenSPARC chips
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSPARC

Are you (pic related)?

Attached: spyroanon.png (2175x743, 837K)

spyro user had 2x4 or 1x8 cores, but I don't know,
you could be lying
on the internet