Anyone on here overclocked their monitor?

I did
>Is there even a noticeable difference if you can only OC an extra 10hz?
You start noticing the blur and ghosting. Not worth it.
There's a reason refresh rate is locked. Unless you've got 60/75Hz TN display which is somehow overclockable, that would make sense. If it's IPS/VA, don't even bother, it will look like shit without overdrive/strobbing. It will make sense to increase the freesync range though, if the display supports freesync.

Nothing will happen. It will either work or not work, depending on the display. I overclocked my 60Hz 1440p panel to 85Hz just fine.

Went from 60hz to 72hz. Not that much of a difference. Plus I had a problem with a game that refused to work fullscreen with OC setting too, so I switched it back for now.

Reminder that, as demonstrated by that pic, bangs are extremely important and western women are foolish for ignoring that fact.

I have an old ass CRT which because of the differrent techn, can actually sacrifice resolution for hz (or vice versa you wouldnt wanna bring a CRT below 70hz because of flickering though). so I can get 120hz at 640x480 res. awesome for old-school FPSs. Cant bring my 3440x1440 75hz to even 80 for some reason though.

Absolutely this

Already overclock my dick every morning

You're probably just using the standard boost clocks.

Real life never goee past 48Hz. It would be jarring to have a higher rate

Who's this semen demon?

wouldn't it be funny if she sat on my face haha

this
though technically not an overclock, since i didn't exceed the monitors' specifications

Haha I just imagined the feeling. Certainly funny, hehe.

I reverse searched the pic, but no real matches. Probably just a onetime photo model.

eri kitami

God bless you, user

I push mine from 60 to 74, 75 is too much for it.
I noticed it when playing games so I keep it this way. Probably time to upgrade anyway though.

this user gets it

I pushed the lower FreeSync limit to 25 from 40 and the higher limit of 120 to 135 (Hz).
It's a cheap ultrawide.

It's a noticeable improvement for me in games like unoptimized MMOs that can go down to 30's even on the best machines when there's hundreds of characters on the screen at once.

100Hz as a factory overclock. i don't really notice the upgrade to 100Hz from 60Hz unless i go back to 60Hz. so i'm both noticing and not noticing time to time. it's very subtle. i'll always prefer to be at the full 100Hz.

10Hz is more noticeable at lower refresh rates

This. Its noticeable if your base is lower. 60-72 is 20%.

You're hurting yourself if you go 74 instead of 75. Better yet, you should stick to 72 if you watch any movie/anime/video.

>You're hurting yourself if you go 74
How?

>Better yet, you should stick to 72 if you watch any movie/anime/video.
I don't see the reasoning there. I use the source rate of the file when it's open.

Yes. If you ever had a CRT you would know there's a world of difference between 60Hz and 75Hz.

My monitor is rated for 165HZ but comes at 144HZ out of the box. Setting it to 165 is considered overclocking. I don't see a difference at all. Hell, I've seen 240HZ panels in person and can barely tell the difference.

He's probably thinking of multiples of 15 and 24, since these are common framerates.

*30 instead of 15

Well, 75 is multiple of 15, but that works too.

That's diminishing return kicking in.

60 hz has a 16.66 ms response delay. 75hz has 13.33 ms. 144 hz has 6.9 ms, 165 has 6 ms. 240 has 4.16 ms.

Going from 30 hz to 60 hz is definitly noticible for most people. That's 33 ms delay vs 16. Going from 60 to 144 hz is also definitely noticeable for quite a few. 16.6 ms vs ~7 ms. But any lower is pushing it and human brain cannot detect too much of those minute differences.

I will say I came from 60HZ 900p to a 1440p 144HZ and holy shit what a world of difference. Don't know how I used such a shitty screen for so long

I have mine at 70+Hz
I used to have android phone with patches that made it 75-80fps and it was so smooth.
Word of advice is don't ever underclock monitors down to 50Hz or it'll give you Thyroid diseases.

I've actually met Kitami in real life. She's even better in person.

On my old CRT, yes. To maximize the resolution without getting the damn flickering.

You'll get used to it and then it'll be just as boring as your previous one.

I just picked up a 27" 1440p that can be OC'd to 155hz. Gotta wait for a displayport cable to come before I can try it though, store didn't have any 1.2 cables for some reason.

60hz to 75 is very noticeable and makes even a piece of shit monitor usable for muh fast gaymes.
apparently the AUO panels overclocked at 165 performed worse than on 144. at least on the PG279Q if i remember correctly. not worth it at all, even if it were noticeable ever so slightly.
based.

The cable is supposed to come with the monitor.

What's the refresh rate between the brain and eyes?

This one didn't, and it wasn't just my example, reviews were complaining about it as well. It only came with an HDMI cable. Not a huge deal, still supports 144hz this way and I'll only have to suffer for a day without Freesync and 155hz since my cable will be here tomorrow.

Are you retarded?

For how much would she call me names and put her toes into my mouth?

Everyone is retarded. We know you love that word.
He was probably asking about the response time between your eyes and the brain which is a valid question.

She is gorgeous.
Stockings really are the best.

Is that a man?

Overclocking a monitor will change the color of it, since its less stable at higher refresh rates

My 3 Dells just throw up garbled shit when I try to overclock them, can't even hit 65hz.
I'll eventually replace them with 75hz monitors when one buys the farm as I need to keep all 3 of my monitors on the same panel/color and my old Dells haven't been made in half a decade.

my wife whoa

No, that's 24 Hz. The film industry found 48 to be too high and it starts to make people get nauseous.

I've got a X34 and I "overclocked" it from 60-100hz

I love OLs

You're retarded for not knowing he was joking.

You could probably "rent" her to "make a porn" for around $15,000

Probably more. Also she might not if I'm foreigner.

Not memeing.
GIrls have actual rates for being rented out for porns

how stupid would you need to be to turn down free sex "in exchange for" free money?

Not memeing either, I'm pretty sure the rate is higher and some don't take foreigners.

I'd overclock that guy's butthole...

That's actually kind of brilliant now that I think about it. The problem is that the scale of monitors is logarithmic. So you have to overclock a significant amount to even have a noticeable difference in fps. 10hz will not cut it unless your monitor was already a very low rate.

god i wish that were me

picture can get unstable and blurry but you just set the clock rate down when that happens, no permanent damage

Since this is a monitor thread apparently, does anyone have this bitch? 4k IPS with no bezels for

Attached: file.png (700x371, 212K)

I can't tell the difference between 120 and 144hz.

Don't bother with 4k under 32"

I tired to get my TVs refresh rate from 120hz to 144hz, it wasn't happening without frame drops

why not? is 1440p enough at that size?

More than enough. I use a 4k 28" monitor and really wish I sprung for a bigger one

You got a source on that? 24hz was by no means an ideal framerate for viewing, it was chosen because it was the minimal viable framerate, and that meant using less film and putting less wear and tear on camera and projection equipment.

As far as I'm aware she doesn't do actual porn at all, she just sells lewd photo sets. Doesn't even show nips or pussy. That's the case for most of these "ero-cosplay" girls in Japan.

16-24 is the range where persistence of motion starts coming into effect, films were done at that range with multiple strobes of a every frame frame to minimize perceived flicker.

A quick search of that name gave me everything I hoped for.

Attached: 1548316970270.jpg (492x446, 12K)