Theirs got to be some way to reduce latency for plebs who live in the Oceania region I just cant stand it...

>any outside of the box solutions
Spacex Starlink

Great plan, Then I could be a refugee and finally have decent internet

at least that's some hope I guess

Yeah by install more direct submarine cable from oceania to us rather than route it to asia first.
But that's going to be very expensive since you can't find other country to invest.

There is: Tachyons.

Get to work.

wonder how much Tonga could provide?....

what do you need low latency from the US for that isn't available in AU?

Most games I play have servers in both AU and US, things like streaming don't require low latency, so...

brainlet musky fanboi detected
how the fuck will going to space, going over the earth, then back down again, be faster than going over the surface in a straight line

That just got done though. Hawaiki cable just got finished last year.
stuff.co.nz/business/105624605/445m-nz-internet-cable-opens-for-traffic

Terrestrial cables are anything but straight. You're still largely bound by speed of light but you actually get straighter shots with Starlink's layout.

Not enough bandwidth ultimately. What's really needed is more fatter undersea cables. But either of these solutions takes something that there isn't enough of: money.

Stop blaming latency on your shit skills in Fortnite

So you don't know about the dedicated links investment companies use for algotrading...

Tokyo to NY in 5ms

im pretty sure that breaks the speed of light

retard detected

no way that math is right my man

if he's using neutrinos maybe kek

>Theirs got to be some way
whose?

hes right

>Tokyo to NY in 5ms
Nice brain damage you have there. That's just about 7 times faster than light...

>he thinks the finanical elite haven't broken the speed of light

I can help you there
simply join the armed forces, they have network speeds that are sky high
drop some bombs on chinks and saudi klingons in exchange for fast BB speeds

not in new zealand
I don't think we even have any bombs

>he thinks the Jews are stronger than God's laws

The latency is fine. It's only an issue if you're playing your twitch-shooter gaymes with Europeans or some shit.

I guess the cables could go through the earth instead of around it

How do Austrians even online game?

Too hot my dude

>light travels slower in fiber (because it bounces more)

>This fucking retard can't do math
>Questions others math

Kiwi here. It sucks playing Squad with a 220ms ping to west coast servers.

Do a little math and you'll see that a connection to the lowest recommended orbit directly above the ground client will net you latency over 200ms. Satellite networking sucks ass.

In a state of self pity, that's how.

Fiber currently is potentially double the distance due to bounce

this a possible solution? wtfast.com/

Fiber is glass, the light speed you're considering is in vacuum. It's even slower.

Trading by algorithm means the computer managing your trades is right next to the actual stock market it is buying and selling from...

Yes. Dark is faster than light.

Use a QOS lower ping service in wow you could lower ping by like 30% with it

>he thinks god knows about quantum entangled networking with no concept of speed because technically there is no distance

Here you go OP
github.com/tylertreat/Comcast

How much bandwidth is there available? A few Gbit/s at most?

Play with your own kind you sheep fucking commie.

That's why I added time
Yes, light travels slower in non-vacuums because it bounces around inside the medium

Why do you play on US server anyway?
Make your own server with kangaroo, emu and kiwi so you can have lower ping.

You normally would. Any game with a player base that isn't essentially zero will have a bunch of servers in at least Sydney.
I used to play on TF2 servers which had like 4ms ping.

Starlink will be in LEO, not geosync like current satellite internet networks. The distance is drastically less for a LEO net (25ms round trip to a single satellite). Since light in fiber is so stupid slow, you could actually see lower latency over starlink for long distances (a few thousand miles+) since most of the distance is through near vacuum.

Thanks I'll give it a try

The high frequency trader types are going to love Starlink - they already pay lots of money for microwave tower links between big cities (Chicago/NY and London/Frankfurt have them, for example) because that slight decrease in latency vs fiber is worth shelling out for. Getting that same edge on NY/Singapore or London/Sydney and so on will by itself probably bring in enough money to pay for the whole Starlink project.

Attached: Starlink-test-satellites-SpaceX.jpg (2543x1526, 372K)

even if that were somehow possible, it would have to be optical anyway because the heat would increase the resistance of conductive cables

Uhhno? where did you get this map from? The world ends bnear new zealand

Einstein sure is rolling on his grave right now.

Speaking from experience of living in NZ, best latency to USA was around 130ms, at worst (worst being the best you could get to the service) in the 200s.
It's not that bad unless you want to play a twitch shooter. It won't affect you too negatively in most online games. Yes, sometimes you will die/lose because of it but usually that's because you've let yourself get into a situation where the determining factor is that latency.

Why not program an AI that can predict packets of data before a computer receives the actual one? Like speculative execution on modern CPUs.

>use Starlink in AUS
>Satellite sends it to the AUS ground station
>Latency increases even more

Just wait for quantum teleportation to increase its distance. That should do the trick.

Just play with ASEAN my dude.

it goes through the core of the earth idiot

>he doesn't have access to the secret entangled particle lines

pathetic

kekistani here, i get 230ms from pak to na
150 to the uk i think, fiber internet, 99% faster than the rest of the country
pretty sure you cant decrease it or else everyone'd be doing it

I've got a simple solution for you: stop playing videogames, you /v/irgin.

>he thinks quantum entanglement allows for the instantaneous transfer of useful information
Surprise! It only sends random information

Is this some retarded gamer complaint? Grow up.

You can send information using quantum entanglement.
You must make measurements to find the information encoded in entangled particles. If you only have access to one of the particles, you need to somehow acquire the measurements of the other particle.
So even if you use entanglement as a channel to send information, you ability to extract that information is limited by the speed of light.

run your own servers and play the game on them.

just run an ethernet cable along the ocean floor, op