C# runs in the browser

>google Blazor to see what it is
>click their site
>first thing I see
kys

Attached: 1530929942977.jpg (897x177, 16K)

>javascript runs in the browser
>>javascript can generate javascript html and css
>>javascript runs on the desktop
>>javascript runs on mac and linux
>>javascript runs on ios and android
>>javascript runs everywhere
>>javascript is faster than javascript
>>javascript is BETTER than javascript
>>javascript is open source and has always been
>>What are you waiting for, user? C#?

Javascript is shit.
The end.

Learn a real language, OP.

Attached: 1551043928074.png (480x434, 267K)

>>c# runs in the browser
you say that as if it were a good thing. Running code in the browser is the source of all the ills of the modern web. All the shitty performance, all the bloat, almost all the brokenness, all the adtech spyware, and a large chunk of browser security vulnerabilities, all a direct result of running code in the browser instead of just displaying static content.

Killing JS would be a great thing, I agree. But replacing it with something else would defeat the purpose. The goal of killing JS is to replace it with nothing.

>>c# runs in the browser
Fable does it better

go cry at your local bingo hall, you cantankerous boomer

What a convincing argument. You clearly are an authority on the subject. I'm going to stop using Javascript immediately because of your post.

There is no point in arguing for or against anything on this site. No one will be convinced by arguments, shitposting, or whatever else.
Objectively JavaScript is shit there are better alternatives and that's all there is to it.

There aren't alternatives because 99% of the web uses JS. C# is just as shitty as JS, keep gobbling microshit cock and pretending it's any better

>everything mentioned, C++ does better than C#

why even bother?

Objectively? Pull your head out of your ass, you don't have to like the syntax or performance or whatever but either you're missing the point, or just an idiot. Javascript is just a tool for developers, it's like a hammer, you can argue all day long that screwdrivers are betters, but when told to drive a nail into a piece of wood, the hammer is objectively better. That's Javascript to Web dev. One day someone may invent a nail gun for the Web, but as of now, Javascript is the only language worth using with the DOM.

All in all, it's not even that bad of a language, it has its bad parts, but so does every language. Just like C++, there are a million idiots using it, which is where 90% of the bad reputation comes from. And it's a far better for the frontend than C#, by a mile.

>>c# runs in the browser

Except it doesn't.

enjoy compiling your fucking website, dipstick

>What are you waiting for, user? PHP?
yes

Is ASP.NET MVC worth learning or is there something newer and better in visual studio for making web apps

Blazor is still in alpha and there are still a lot of things to iron out and I wouldn't say it's good yet. It can do simple things like creating a todo list and what not but there's still holes in Blazor.

That said, Blazor / Razor-components or what the hell ever their calling it now, has an easier time dealing with client side events simply because the hooks are built-in. I'm not aware of other WASM transpilers / framework that has built in client event hooks.

Use .Net Core instead.

You could use xamarin

>Learn a real language, OP.
Which in your mind is?

Web api in core + whatever meme frontend framework

Yes C# is proprietary. Microsoft and Microsoft alone makes the choices on it.
Open Source does not exclude something from being proprietary.