Whats your excuse on using gcc over clang user?

Whats your excuse on using gcc over clang user?

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 5K)

i use visual studio

You can bootstrap and build gcc in substantially less time, it takes up less space and the code it produces is higher quality for more platforms.

I use both.

gcc generates faster code

I don't. I've dropped gfortran for flang as well

/thread

(You)
(You)
this

-Wlogical-op

Its faster than clang. Also Clang is a corporate trojan horse.

I use MSVC though

-fsanitize=integer, being lazy to compile gcc for cross-compiling and ThinLTO (aka my software is so shit and compiles so slowly that I need overly complicated incremental build), and being native on the OS (aka MacOS and BSDs) are the only reasons to use clang
otherwise linux compiler is the way to go

Selling raw lobs 500gp each. Get 10 free for every 1000 you buy!

>that pic
Fuck you for giving me feels.

Attached: 1550017824333.jpg (640x427, 32K)

>the microsoft vermin appears

Also open to trades. Willing to take full steel armor sets and Oak logs.

The most exciting thing I did in my first days as member was that I would buy runes from the Varrock rune store and sell them to the mages gathered at Camelot. The first I made good profit.

flash2: Buy all lobs 250ea ~~xxanonxx4201~~

I used to fletch adamant arrows and sell them. I used to ALWAYS sell out.
Varrok West bank. You have to buy minimum 2000 though.

Why not both? MSVC have a better debugger and tools, but GCC generate a better binary, so you could use MSVC to develop, but use GCC for the final build.

I don't. I don't really care about which I use but clang has a better front end for YouCompleteMe

Attached: clang.png (1222x685, 57K)

>Visual Studio
>Better tool
Sure thing bud

For autocomplete, debugging and stuff, it is pretty much unmatched by any open source solution, at least for now.
But its compiler quite sucks at making a really fast binary.

But I do use clang.

Attached: CLANG LLVM.jpg (1920x1080, 1.18M)

The consensus I've heard is that people use CLang for testing and GCC for final builds

I've had issues with intellisense that I haven't had with clang + YCM, I think there's some discrepancies since intellisense and the compiler are two different programs. I agree on the debugger though, I still haven't figured out how to use GDB/LLDB other than unwinding the stack

what's the GCCs low level IR?
I really love SSA and clang uses SSA. Iirc GCC had some CFG lisp or something.

i use tiny c compiler for developlment and gcc for final build.

Clang plus Cquery or YCMd is not too far behind.

buying gf

gcc uses SSA form and has for a long time now.

Apparently I meant RTL. I really have to look more into GCC internals desu.

I don't have a members account.

Attached: mpv-screenshot0004.png (1360x768, 851K)

what are your vim settings?

>not using nvcc

Attached: 1550091565844.png (719x769, 611K)

dds++ is the patrician's choice

>outdated gcc with a shitty proprietary backend.
Clang has a better CUDA backend already.

I never bothered with clang. should I use that as the default compiler on gentoo? faster compile times with lower usage seems like a massive advantage over gcc

my job means i have to use visual studio for it's compiler but the debugger is nice too.

>corporate trojan horse
Explain please. I never cared much about LLVM to know about it.

Are people influenced by images like this? Just asking in all innocence.

Influenced in what way? I think Marisa is cute, that's about all that comes to mind when looking at it.

Influenced in using clang over gcc. Or choose a distro or programming language based on that kind of images.

Attached: 1551543154641.png (1200x1800, 1.3M)

>lend friend rune scimmy for dragon slayer
>he forgets to put his shield on, dies and loses it

this was 13 years ago and we still argue about it today