Better than a DSLR, prove me wrong
Better than a DSLR, prove me wrong
Liam Ortiz
Other urls found in this thread:
gsmarena.com
twitter.com
Thomas Thomas
Need moar cameras.
Adam Wilson
that's so disturbing
Zachary Brooks
James Walker
Aaron Powell
Not even close. Do you even have a clue what the best DSLRs are capable of?
Cooper Baker
You just posted a publicity still. If you posted a comparison photo, you wouldn't have made this thread.
Evan Barnes
5 camera > 1 camera, QED
Mason Baker
>prove me wrong
much worse dynamic range than even old DSLRs
Lucas Peterson
>5 camera > 1 camera, QED
You can't possibly be serious. These are still five tiny smartphone sensors.
Camden Kelly
vriska is a vile worm
Bentley Nguyen
Weeell, I sort of get where he's coming from. The main problem with small sensors is the noise, but if you have multiple small sensors imaging at the same time you could effectively eliminate the noise to achieve better results than a DSLR. The downside is it won't work for photographing any really close stuff.
Jason Stewart
8est worm
Carter Nguyen
each sensor is tiny. dynamic range is largely a function of sensor size to pixel density, so without ~10 sensors I don't see this competing with a full frame dslr
Sebastian Morris
>DSLR
Dick Suckin' Lips Redux?
Benjamin Johnson
This does not even compete against a point'n'shoot camera. Any old DSLR is 10x better than anything mounted on a smartphone.
This being said, I love my Nokia 8 :-)
Jayden Brooks
10 Cameras, huh?
This can be done.
Nathaniel Cooper
read it and weep neckbeard failures:
gsmarena.com
this IS better than most DSLRs
Kayden Bailey
>this IS better than most DSLRs
What makes you say so?
Ian Morgan
>no comparison photos between it and a single DSLR
Read it and you're full of shit. Unsurprisingly.
Joseph Howard
>one fixed focus lens
>better than a DSLR
Zachary Green
Yeah, looks great.
Anthony Morgan
>less light hitting the sensor
>bad low light
>noise
>bad depth of field
sure thing bub
Ryder Perez
>fixed focal length
/thread