The UK is looking to extend it's porn ID system to other websites

The UK is looking to extend it's porn ID system to other websites.

>The idea of requiring ID for sites such as Facebook is now ‘under discussion’, says British obscenity lawyer Myles Jackman.

>In the near future, you might also need to use such systems to log into site such as Facebook or Twitter, Jackman says. Jackman says,

>'There seems to be a massive groundswell of opinion in Westminster that age verification is a solution to the problem. It's seen as a simple way forward to cure all the ills allegedly caused by social media.'

>In terms of timescale, it’s less clear, Jackman says, but there’s huge support in Parliament for the idea, he says.

Attached: sei_50575384-c00a.jpg (540x352, 49K)

Other urls found in this thread:

metro.co.uk/2019/03/04/pornhub-youporns-compulsory-age-checks-will-work-next-month-8811336/
theguardian.com/law/2015/sep/09/one-lawyers-crusade-defend-extreme-pornography
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Source?

metro.co.uk/2019/03/04/pornhub-youporns-compulsory-age-checks-will-work-next-month-8811336/

This bit was at the bottom of this whole article about the porn system going live next month.

The entire thing was never about protecting children. It was about censorship and control.

Myles Jackman is actually a pretty good lawyer, too.

theguardian.com/law/2015/sep/09/one-lawyers-crusade-defend-extreme-pornography

just use VPN

So no more britfags on Jow Forums? Good.

Wouldn't it be easier if they make an age website that requires a password that you obtain from the government instead?

No privacy -> dead critics
No porn -> sexual violence (minors)
No access to social media -> mmh dont know. Communication. Whatsapp and other p2p comms also getting behind id wall?

Porn websites must love this. Now they'll be able to tie all porn surfing directly to an identity.

Let the UK fall to the Muslims. It is never getting better under bong rule. If past laws are any indication of the future they will mock the rest of the world for not being as oppressed as them.

Attached: 1482398201885.jpg (640x480, 43K)

Lol thank God that shithole of a country is leaving the EU

Maybe we can deport all of our Muslims to the UK once we white people take over our countries

The UK leaving the EU is literally the best thing that could have happened to all parties involved.
This way they can't force their Iron Lady bullshit on the rest of Europe.

The UK should be turned into a prison like that movie starring Kurt Russel.

It's literally an island in the ocean. So it'll be like Alcatraz.

And that's a good thing!

>alright facebook in the name of the queen do this
>no
what now?

I assume the government would just block domains and addresses unless you have provided your identity. Why check all the porn sites follow your rules when you can just toss them on a blacklist?

So TPTB have figured out I don't have any interest in pedo shit so they are gonna ban all porn. Creative thinking on their part.

boomers trying to make tech laws is pathetic. makes me think of that senate hearing where the guy on the technology committee is asking the google VP of privacy the most basic shit.

I can't wait to leave this shit hole country.

In a few decades the UK will be poorer than venezuela anyway.

Can't believe no one else has posted this yet

>good
>lawyer
pick one?

The absolute state of the United Cuckdom.

Attached: 1520943284544.png (787x796, 151K)

How is this not a good thing? The government is unintentionally pushing people to use VPNs.

Even with this, few people are actually going to do that. They will just register. I suspect that this is actually about slowly pushing into forcing people to use their clear name on all social platforms. First they justify building this infrastructure with pornography or dangers for children, then they slowly creep it into more areas and use it to keep a full record about everybody. That way they can fully enforce the hatespeech laws online and identify thought criminals.

Attached: 1545020207235.jpg (375x500, 41K)

I've been looking up VPN's because of it, it's actually a really hard choice

Where were you the day britbongs decided to shoot themselves in the foot after brexit by isolating themselves from the mainstream internet? That is actually a good shot against Facebook and twitter, they’ll be free of britbongs

In the future, every user generated content will have a name and face pic attached to it. ID for porn is just the beginning. On top of that youll have analytics in the background like today

Attached: cover.jpg (1600x1600, 3.57M)

What’s the current cost of one? Why not just go with a VPS and host your own at this point.

based taste in beats user

And then they will make VPNs legal only for company use

VPN's don't keep you anonymous, don't treat them that way. They ideally keep the sites you visit from knowing who or where you are, but you can never know if the VPN company gives away your date. "No logs" is a meme. Pick based on speed, price and stuff like being able to avoid VPN blocks, some offer a special method to do that but I don't know how well that works. Don't pick based on "security". If you want anonymity, use tor, not VPN.

Because I've never looked into either before now, all the silkroad clones are honeypots now so why would I need a VPN?

I know VPN's aren't anonymous and they'll hand your data over, but I don't want to pay the government to shitpost on Jow Forums much less buy a fucking porn license, I'd much rather pay for a VPN+Pass out of spite

if the endpoint expect clear text

>VPN endpoint will hand over cleartext
>Your endpoint get's cleartext

encrypted is connection only, fuck know who's server and you still fucked

t. retard user

You sound like a parrot. VPNs in this case, would totally be keeping him anonymous. You over estimate the capacity of the state to handle what will literally be trillions of data points without a fast way to identify anyone, specially when it isn't a crime. The logic to bring someone to court over this circunvention of law is that to keep porn from open access of children it requires a license, a VPN requires a credit card for purchase and as such, for the person to be over 18 anyways. In order to make it a crime they'd have to literally outlaw porn all together or out law the usage of VPNs.

thread isn't about that and besides he's right

>They ideally keep the sites you visit from knowing who or where you are

Ideally being the keyword shill

>connect to a server through an encrypted connection
>ISP sees you connect to the server
>ISP does not know what you're getting from server or sending to the server
>ITS NOT ANONYMOUS
explain how faggot.

based government
maybe this will fix the facebook and porn addicts

Read my post again and you will know the answer. I literally explained it.

so you're assuming VPN company is simply handing out logs to authorities of the UK? That's your basis for the no anonymity claim? That is just hogwash of an excuse.

see my previous post FAGGOT

Some also sell data to advertisement companies and so on, how do you think the free VPN services make money? Payed once can do it as well though. Anonymity is not only about governments, you know that, right? You never know who they give your data to, you always have to trust them, that's the point.

who said anything about "free vpn" services. Those are assumed to simply be a tunnel to avoid geoblocking and other reasons, everyone knows those are not safe. I am talking about paid VPN services and VPSs you can self host a VPN with.

VPN isn't going to work for long.
Whitelisting can defeat all encryption. Need to use company's vpn? You need to get a vpn license.
No license? Isp automatically filters all encrypted packet it doesn't understand.
TLS can be legally mitmed with a required government root certificate

>I'm giving them money, that means they can't jew me and double collect the Shekels
You're pretty naive.

>Even with this, few people are actually going to do that. They will just register. I suspect that this is actually about slowly pushing into forcing people to use their clear name on all social platforms. First they justify building this infrastructure with pornography or dangers for children, then they slowly creep it into more areas and use it to keep a full record about everybody. That way they can fully enforce the hatespeech laws online and identify thought criminals.
clearly won't work though even if they think it will

maybe for actual boomers

Didn't the Russians or Chinese come up with a way of snooping on HTTPS traffic recently?

in Jow Forums we trust

You're thinking about domain blocking which is currently sent unencrypted

Nope. Found it.

South Korea.

>South Korea will expand its site blocking measures with SNI eavesdropping, so HTTPS sites can be blocked as well. The new measure, which will also affect pirate sites, has generated widespread opposition. While it's more effective than standard DNS blocking, it's certainly not impossible to circumvent.

perhaps you're to paranoid.

>clearly won't work though
I don't know, do you think normies would suddenly stop using facebook and twitter if they would have to register the account with the government? Most of them already use their real name, I think they would just register, complain for a week and forget about it. Normies are fucking retarded, user.

>He thinks there is such a thing as "to paranoid"

Attached: 1532535434745.gif (200x150, 436K)

r/DataHoarder/ suddenly doesn't seem like a bunch of diseased people when you consider what can happen the imposition of borders on the internet would turn it into a totally different thing than what it is today, and will happen eventually.

I keep a SSD on my x220 of 30gb which has Windows 10 decoy install on it with absolutely no personal data or internet ever used.

I use the internet on a live distro only, I keep no personal data on my computer. I have a external drive where I keep my data and I have literal two copies of it, one at home the other one offsite (3-2-1). I have had a face to face conversation with state investigators because one of my so called friends turned out to have less than savory interests which he searched for online, and said investigator asked for my backup hard drive and phone. I live on a constant level of paranoia. I am not a schizo though to assume the level of paranoia you are assuming, is insane, if you are that paranoid that you assume a business that makes money literally on hiding your ass would jeopardize said business and hand over that much data over something that isn't even a crime, you're just out of your fucking mind

Even if I use NordVPN which is considered good, if I use one of their US servers doesnt it HAVE to log me by law?

Seems like the best countries to use are far... like Switzerland.

>website blocked
>need privacy against government
just use vpn

I've heard ProtonVPN has a free service for web browsing only.

Since they're operated by the same people as ProtonMail, which is based in Swissland.

>you're just out of your fucking mind
>paranoid
>insane
>schizo
>just trust VPN providers, it's save

Attached: 1494523048378.jpg (2048x1536, 185K)

NEXT UP: DEEP PACKET INSPECTION

its irrelevant data, you're not even doing anything illegal, you're just using it to browse. All these theories and none of it proven factual by China or USA.

People's browsing data is worth a lot and the browsing data of people who are explicitly trying to stay anonymous is worth even more. It's not irrelevant data. I never said that VPN doesn't have it's uses, but it's not something anyone should rely on if he actually wants to stay anonymous.

If you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide.

If you have nothing to say, you have nothing to post.

>If you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide.
That's the point, everyone in Britain is comitting some sort of crime because it's tyranical, this is a deliberate measure to keep peoples heads down so people are less inclined to risk their wellbeing to dissent against the state
>Criticising muslim rape gangs on twitter literally got multiple people visits from the police

millions in autocratic regimes disagree with you, they're kept safe on the basis of using VPNs. Anonymity is possible in more ways than one, if I wanted to be anonymous I'll go over to my local supermarket and do illegal shit on their wifi no VPN required.

It's not like a visit from the British police is a threatening experience lol

Attached: 1525708280953.jpg (1000x627, 106K)

>It's not like a visit from the British police is a threatening experience

Pretty much this. Just open the window and tell them to fuck off and come back with a warrant.

>some shitty sand country can't force western VPN companies to give them data
>that means I'm save
Lmao.

Why aren't Brits mass migrating out of this orwellian hellhole?

Any opinions on country of the server regardless of the service?

Oi u got a loicense for dat window?

>j00t sells Jow Forums
>governments around the world start doing janky shit
>g00k changes site name to 4channel
>this happens immediately after.
is it time to go innawoods, faggots?

Attached: file.png (1354x784, 675K)

Porn ID? For identifying actresses, right

Why aren't Americans migrating out of their nergified hellhole with insane crime statistics? Because they can still live in relative comfort.

Isn't this a good thing? Keep those under 18 shitters off of social media. They'll probably get more support because of the whole softcore, self-distributed pizza on youtube too.

We will finally be able to pin a name to the biggest faggot in the world now. What a time we live in. What a time.

>Oi u got a loicense for dat window?
We used to have taxes for windows actually, that's why you see a lot of bricked up windows when someone posts bongladesh architecture
The government literally taxed us for sunlight

Attached: 1531298468821.png (900x600, 29K)

Australia tried to do some censorship style shit. Getting around this faggot system would be as simple as changing your DNS probably.

How are you even still there? It's a legit police state now. It's rapidly turning into airstrip one.

>We used to have taxes for windows actually

I love it when memes lead to instinctually correct knowledge

Attached: 8ED06FEC-7C16-4C4A-84D5-384507347144.jpg (650x488, 32K)

Its pretty retarded, even for nonbrit like me... If this id retardation spreads its gona end ugly

Most of our crime is in the negroid containment zones like Baltimore.

i don't get the problem. you can still download your pr0n via torrent, like people normally do

Torrent sites and places like Jow Forums are going to be considered "Obscene content" and sit within the porn ban umrella, you're not naive enough to think banning porn sites means only porn do you? What self respecting politician wouldn't push to ban as much as possible

Normal people don't download porn.

>The government literally taxed us for sunlight

>The UK
>sunlight

Attached: Oh_you.jpg (447x335, 39K)

unironically, this is true.

Rare goods get taxed extra.

That was 10 years ago

lmao at yanks pretending this don't affect the commonwealth bitch countries and the FBI isn't the vector too

>based j00t

The VPN endpoint won't be getting anything in cleartext if your connection is encrypted (except destination).
VPNs encapsulate the traffic. They don't change the encryption.

(except destination).

who the fuck are you again?

you know what I meant, you should know not to pleb up Jow Forums anymore than I do

They’ll sell it as a way to secure commentary against foreign actors (monopolizing brainwashing for the msm)

Dont do it. Copyright trolls now highly active suing people for settlement cash

Maybe people in this thread are overblowing it? They'll just block a few porn sites and call it a day

>SHIRLEY IT WILL WOAK THIS TOIME I SAY

Sucks to live in the UK

t brainlet with no vision

once a function like this is assigned to government it will be used more and more often

Like how in the UK RIPA (password handover law) was used to catch terrorists, but then they started using it for other shit like monitoring what time people put bins out and fined them and stuff.