Airplane crashes are technology.
How plane in 2019 can crash, considering amount of anti-retard technology there?
Airplane crashes are technology
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
theaircurrent.com
thejakartapost.com
seattletimes.com
youtube.com
rgl.faa.gov
twitter.com
weather is unpredictable
(((JOOS)))
they didn't bother train to fly a Boeing specifically
yes, really, niggers are this retarded
read the reports
literally just make a PID to adapt to weather jesus christ its not that difficult
Weather radars exist.
Also, it is clear day on plain terrain, nothing should happen
Incredibly complex machine run by incredibly complex software that is, for whatever unfathomable reason, assumed to be bug free.
You know, assuming... not pilot error, not mechanical failure, not enemy action, not crazy weather etc. etc. etc.
They used new or delete while in flight.
They were white tho...
I guess this is what happens, if you teach poos to program in Ada.
not anymore
That is some weird racist joke, I like it
This is why there should be one switch, that turns off all smarts, and leaves just pure basic controls,
This whole website is some weird racist joke, I like it
What if that switch breaks, user?
It's frequently a red button on the yoke.
God doesn't want man to fly.
You remove panel and pull wires, obv.
Where?
Autopilot disengage is not "turn off MCAS and sheit" button.
Sometimes the crashes are an inside job... like 9/11
Unless plane is using TempleOS
To be fair, passenger airliners basically already do that
Most of the switches control functions unrelated to flying, like passenger compartment stuff (seatbelts, aircon) and the majority of the rest are for the display panels that give you info about flying, autopilot, and redundant controls for the plane
If you ignored regulation, you could probably get rid of 80-90% of all controls in a boeing 7x7 plane, and still have it functional
But why Boeing doesn't have MCAS breaker/switch, while Airbus has FAC switch?
Also, why B*eing panel is a mess?
Some men just want to crash the plane with no survivors
Rent a Cessna
Fly into rock
Profit
Big guys require big planes
Rent a 747 and fly into the rock (or some towers if you like dramma)
>rent a 747
link?
Or steal. They have no ignition keys, since niggers are too stupid to remember.
Post cockpits for real men
good luck escaping fighter jets
If your purpose is suicide, that is not an issue, as it was shown with Air Alaska accident.
Best airbus ever existed.
Exact same type of crash happened not even 6 months ago.
Sasuga boeing.
>imagine writing unit tests for those buttons
fuck
Boeing is finished and bankrupt
Number of buttons isn't significantly larger, just proper instruments, not LCD rubbish
>6 engines
Fucking unit
Why didn't the pilot just parachute out?
Boeing 737 doesn't have parachutes.
Dude, I want this yoke on my car.
if ( plane.crashing() ){
plane.doNotCrash()
}
God is pretty fucking weak if he can only manage to down an airplane every 6 month.
Fuck, next Friday I have a flight with Southwest (all their fucking planes are 737s). I'm unironically considering canceling it right now.
What's going on with Boeing?
probably engine failure due to negligence because airports are lazy as fuck to do actual repairs.
one in four political assassinations is a plane crash
>the power of aircraft """AI"""
ISHYGDDT
One fucker did it, and since then on all passenger planes all doors are locked until plane hits the ground.
>second fatal crash in 4 months with same exact model experiencing the exact same issues
>negligency
twitter.com
The only negligents here are Boeing code monkeys:
theaircurrent.com
>ejector seats
>six engines
>wing tip fold
>oh shit
>that landing gear indicator diagram
>it's the Valkyrie
RIP variable geometry delta wings
RIP massive canards
that is not a PID
the data from flightradar suggest the plane was wobbling up and down the vsi was going crazy
like like the lionair crash..
if this shit turns out to be again at fault from the mcas boeing seriously need to remove this shit
Or even better, design plane from scratch, which will not need MCAS.
t. Doesn't know how airplanes work at all
This, but unironically
Are they going to ground those flying coffins now?
Depends, but I'd ground all Boeings with MCAS.
>design plane from scratch, which will not need MCA
737 Max program cost less than $3 billion, 787 clean sheet design cost over $32 billion. One day they will replace the 737 but it will not be until they build something to fill in the gap left by the 757.
Yes I am pretty confident it is the fucking MCAS.
Boeing should ground all 737 right fucking now, the fuck they are waiting for?
But Boeings don't crash.
When it comes to shitty decisions, you're better start from scratch
I know what I PID is. I'm just laughing at the fact that you think a PID will solve this. A plane is a complex non linear multivariable system made by thousands of components. Of course there are control systems all over the place, storms reduce the controllability of the plane and push these systems to the verge of what they can do. You can only ask the actuators and the structure of the plane for so much.
meanwhile a350 program had a cost of 11 billion
and even the standard version is more or less better than the 787
Shit, I made this picrel recently, I guess I've caused this to happen.
Looks like the latest 737 line might be having issues with its stall prevention feature. I wonder if Boeing's big division in India writes any of their flight software.
>Southwest
Aren't they having some operational problems thanks to a spat with their mechanic's union right now?
737-NG is OK
737-MAX - only if you believe in Islam
>ywn see 207
Too pure for this world. ;_;7
This is unironically the reasoning used for the Cirrus SF50.
The most beautfiul plane ever conceived.
>Only 350 Boeing 737 MAX currently in service
>Already 2 crashes
I thought flying was safe? wtf
barbara hammer the only female pilot of concorde shared a story years ago
There's this SR-71 Blackbird stooging around Cuba on a top-secret mission, at FL500+ and Mach 2+.... when they get a call requesting them to change heading "because of traffic at your altitude".
Traffic at THEIR altitude ??
Anyway, they comply, and shortly, yes, there's an Air France Concorde out of Caracas (Air France flew there in the early days) slowly sailing across their flight path.
Just imagine... two guys in bonedomes and full pressure suits, in a cramped cockpit, watching something like a hundred people in shirt sleeves or summer dresses, sipping their champagne and maybe just starting on their smoked salmon hors d'oeuvres, flying at their altitude and nearly their speed...."
IT'S HAPPENING
Would mean more if the SR71 was anywhere beyond 2nd gear as is said in automotive parlance.
>ywn cross Nebraska in 8 minutes
This. Fuck Boeing.
Buy Tupolev
Who had wrote (((software))) for 737MAX?
Same guys, who made it for 787?
if you knew anything about concorde you would know that its max ceiling was around 69000ft and the maximum speed ever achieved with simulated weight was 2.78mach
the sr 71 was just 300kts faster at 15000ft higher nothing really to brag about
>assumed to be bug free
literally no one assumes this, it usually takes years to certify avionics software packages, and even then they don't get all the bugs
see: the FAA mandatory reboots for the 787: seattletimes.com
>habe u dried to tern it off and on agein?
Seriously read the article, there's a buffer overflow bug that can completely shut down the flight control system if it's left on continuously for 22 days lmao
Lol.
This is absolute level of void poo (needful n); programming
In fairness that would be something that doesn't happen ... ever.
Murphy's law, nigger
>what do u mean, int has a limit?
Fair enough... I just think it would die before being on 22 days.
youtube.com
Basically most crashes are from 3rd world countries that can't afford new planes/replacement parts/maintenance, and most of the crashes from the civilized world happen due to unforeseen problems.
The actual top speed of the SR71 remains unknown. Every pilot interviewed publicly has stated that the aircraft "always had more" with more than one reporting speeds in excess of M3.5. It also flew well over a decade prior after being developed in... 18 months, was it?
It's not only a software issue: AOA sensors were fucked up
Reminder that both the Indonesia and Ethiopia crashes were in brand-new Boeing 787 MAX aircraft that were delivered in the past year
This is why python is a bad thing to teach in schools and unis.
Assembly is the only way. It will repell poos, f*males and other SJews.
and the faulty sensor triggered an undocumented stall-correction "feature" in the software
the US Pilot unions protested when this came to light because none of them knew about it either
everything around sr 71 has been declassified decades now
the max allowed(depended on air temp time and distande of the air tanker) speed was 3.3 mach
purely being throttled back because of the thermals and the fact that it couldnt hold any more fuel without basicly making the rest of the plane a fuel tank
Are you retarded? their fleet is literally brand new
Failed sensors should be discarded.
airbus has literally the same shit only that they discard the events if the readings arent in unison with the rest of the sensors