Is she our Jow Forumsal?

All of those companies compete with each other

Botnet bingo?

People said you could never break up Standard Oil and the Bell corporation. But it happened, and now we have Exxon, Mobil, Chevron, BP etc and AT&T, Verizon, Cingular etc

personal data-loss roulette?

But again, what would be the point of breaking up Google and Facebook? No one is being forced to use their sites or services, so this is just typical pandering for votes. It makes no fucking sense.

This desu. We have a much healthier market in oil and telecom because of these breakups. The only 2 ways out of the mess we're in right now are if the current monopolies are broken up and made to compete properly, or if the crash and burn and probably get replaced by a new generation of the same.

Please do it
The only reason Facebook even still exists is because of WhatsApp and Instagram.

iTODDLERS BTFO

Attached: 1521272504380.gif (540x304, 1.78M)

>fag
veri clever huehue

I don't like Google and Apple, but is the authoritarian type of shit that will spark a new economic crisis.

YAOI! ANIME! TRANSPORTATION! TECHNOLOGY! BY OUR POWERS COMBINED... WE ARE

holy fucking based

Attached: 1552062945596.jpg (490x450, 75K)

If I had any reason to trust her I wouldn't even consider anyone else for president. This is so long overdue, holy shit.

Wouldn't liberal college faggots hate anyone who wants to kill their beloved Apple and Google?

>not (apple) (f) (a) (g)
You had one job.

>voting for a gun grabber

Who gave shitpostbot9000 a pass. Reported for astroturfing.

Not really, they collude (either directly and indirectly), and the problem is that they prevent any small company from ever existing, which is why the final goal of every startup nowadays is to spend money they don't have in hopes they'll be bought by the big tech companies and retire for life.

You're crazy. It's impossible to browse the web without amazon, google, facebook, and/or microsoft services being used to even so much as render the site (azure, aws), let alone allow you to post (captcha) or signin (most sites now use exclusively 3rd party signin services that only allow google+, facebook, etc. accounts).

>the problem is that they prevent any small company from ever existing
Please explain to me how those companies are stopping ANYBODY from creating another Facebook or Google.

On the one hand, I am racist towards Native Americans, on the other hand, I want to see Apple burn. Hmm

Attached: smug.jpg (1012x712, 142K)

Because if you don't let them buy you, they bury you by a wide variety of tools they have at their disposal: unrank you in search, copy your features and use their connections to prevent you from having clients, buy out your people individually, etc.

>Democrats alienating their corporate overlords
Is there anything that party can do correctly?

>gun grabber
I smell astroturfing. Or maybe that's the astroglide.

And what proof do you have for any of this? Because it sounds like you're just making shit up. If your product is good and people want to use it they will, period. There is nothing stopping you from making a Google or Facebook clone literally right now.

>republicucks bending over asking for more assfucking from their corporate overlords
Is there anything that party can do besides smoke cock?

Oh, you're merely a shill. And here I thought discussion could happen. Oh well. I guess this shitposting of yours was worth 2 rupees at least.

>astroturfing
The other guy probably. I just think the yang shit is funny.

>be you
>literally make up complete horse shit with no basis in reality
>DUR WHY ARE YOU CALLING ME OUT ON MY OBVIOUS BULLSHIT DUR

Just fuck off and die

Thank you for your contribution today Rajesh! This is to notify you of automatic payment to your balance of 2.34 rupees so far. Your current balance is 45.66 rupees. Kindly do the needful sir!

OP is a faggot

>Match my donation!
>Bernie needs that 4th summer home

Typical librul "I'm angry at x this week" bullshit.

Well played sirrah

Attached: 1552009987406.gif (274x480, 3M)

based and sataniapilled

but seriously i like her better than bernie, AOC, and Yang at least.
dont know enough about her foreign or domestic policy to really give an answer but i will never vote for a democrat regardless

cont.
i like antitrust laws but they honestly should be used well before this point of permeation.
something like an automatic corporate death sentence for all businesses at the 15 year mark would be ideal.

at this point, these companies are so widely loathed that is is incomprehensible to me why consumers arent leaving in droves.
this indicates a deeper problem of willing self-enslavement and servility by the public that cant be redressed through laws. breaking these firms up now seems to be a poor idea if it prevents people from learning by their mistakes.
and given the publics demonstrated willingness to be led around by the nose, there is a high degree of likelihood antitrust laws would be misused by existing powers to shut out competition rather than creating it.

If it helps, Warren was a Republican until the mid-90s, because they used to "best support markets" until they began relaxing on monopolies.

She's not talking out of her ass. She's a Gung ho FDR liberal. Read her book This Fight Is Our Fight and look at her career. She has spearheaded some of the biggest financial regulations in the past decade and she's been the most bad ass member of every committee she's been on in the Senate.

Then why does she constantly come across as a genuinely dumb person? The only one that's worse is that literal faggot Booker

yes

Apple is a monopoly?

Are you kidding? Do you know how much capital it would require to create a substitute product to Facebook or Google? They are the definition of natural monopolies. Sure before we broke up AT&T no one was stopping you from making your own phone company, maybe you'd even make a better more desirable one but the chance of competing economically with a company that had such a vast infrastructure in place was impossible. You really think the reason Facebook is succeeding is because it offers such a great platform? Their platform sucks and it's only allowed to suck so bad because the cost of entering into competition with them is too high at this point.

I suppose I don't know what you mean about her coming across as a dumb person. I think her twitter feuds with Trump come across as dumb but twitter feuds look bad on anyone. Generally her CSPAN appearances and her books make her come across as a well informed politician who cares about the middle class more than anything.

Marketshare is only one form of monopoly. Apple's is using their power to force OEMs into production contracts wherein they have no choice but to run at tiny profits or lose their contract and go out of business, and then squeezing them for even more to run at near zero profit. This straight up extortionate practice causes OEMs who want to run for a livable profit charge higher prices which raises prices for competitors, and why competitors, even large multinationals are unable to get the same pricing because they don't have the buying power Apple constantly abuses.

>I suppose I don't know what you mean about her coming across as a dumb person
literally any interview she does on TV

how will mactoddlers ever recover?

based

I can't believe this idiocy and ignorance on Jow Forums of all places. There are actually people on this board defending fucking Facebook, Google, and Apple for their monopolistic bullshit.

I'm not defending anything, I just think Warren is a fucking moron that constantly says stupid shit because she thinks she's "suppose" to have these views to be popular. I detest all of these companies, but the idea you're gonna break them up when literally nobody is forced to use any of those services is retarded.

>if i don't use them, they aren't harming the industry!
kill yourself retard

Tell me how you are being forced to buy an IPhone or use Google's search engine, because I'd love to hear this

Nothing but this. They mad because jewgle sold some ads to russians and trump won.

>shit to pander to college-aged liberal faggots
how the f does this pander to people who emotionally identify with these companies

Or vote Pete Buttigieg who actually understands the value of data and isn't another fucking dinosaur president.

Oh boy, a socialist retard itt

>Pete Buttigieg
>he's a faggot

Attached: hahaha.jpg (940x613, 36K)

This.

Attached: pinochet_communistBTFO.png (354x400, 193K)

Attached: pinochet.jpg (988x662, 165K)

>ITODDLERS-
>satania.gif

Attached: 77DC1060-9645-4B04-ACBD-2B9E1A5DC581.gif (365x400, 551K)

based
based

Attached: A252BF90-D718-4B5D-A945-2143310D0BAB.jpg (2500x1250, 133K)

Fighting communism is fine because it's such a disastrously bad idea that people get behind mostly as a way to escape from imperial overlords. However, painting something you don't like as communism just to justify fighting it is a commie-tier tactic.

What she's proposing is literal communist policy though. There is no real reason to break up any of these companies other than "dur they make too much money dur"

Monopolies have been broken in America before. Instead of saying 'we shouldn't break companies up because it's communism', provide a real fucking reason.

Why debate commies when you can give them free helicopter rides?

Attached: pinochet_increasinglyverbose.jpg (889x960, 160K)

Sorry but my vote goes to the bern

Do you know the definition of monopoly? You could make a case for Amazon, MAYBE, but Google, Facebook and Apple? Give me a fucking break. Just because a company makes billions of dollars that does not make them a monopoly.

There's no need to worry about communism because there's no imperial overlords. I could argue that google, apple, etc are becoming imperial overlords due to their overwhelming control over society, and that leaving them in one piece has a higher risk of communism since it gives people something to fight. Splitting them up before they become something that people would go to communism to resist is a better strategy to reduce the risk of communism.

Those are actual reasons, thanks. "It's communism" is not a reason no matter how many people they killed. Exactly, they're huge companies but would breaking them up be of any benefit? They're global powers. Splitting them up state-side would give you some regional monopolies and then 'google world' for everywhere else.

Splitting them up needs to be evaluated in terms of benefit, not resisted or embraced on ideological terms.

These companies are NOT monopolies though. No one is forced to buy IPhones, use Facebook or Google. All of those things can be easily avoided if you don't want them. And again, how are you going to break up these companies? They can just pack up and leave if they want too, then what? That's probably what the democrats want anyway, the poorer people are and on the government's tit the more they can more easily get their vote.

It doesn't matter if they're monopolies or not. Would splitting them be better overall? If not, then don't split.
Personally I'd rather see a public investigation into just how much these companies have got their tendrils into. Pull up their fucking finances, see what they're doing. Then you could look at those and see how much control they have over things.

>All of those things can be easily avoided if you don't want them.
Sure, just don't use the internet lmao.
You do realise that facebook has tracking on almost every website you visit, right?

You're also posting on Jow Forums, which google is used for captchas, and for analytics. I recommend installing umatrix, and you'll quickly see that to stop using google and facebook you need to stop using the internet. (Or rather, to have their fucking tracking scripts leave you alone) But their tracking scripts are ran and work on their servers, so it is their service that is being used. Even if you aren't the person benefiting from it.

>the big five can be easily avoided on the internet
>t. retard

Not to mention AWS. Amazon hosts cloud servers for half the internet.

Then he's in good company with the majority of if not all Jow Forums users.

google has a monopoly on web search

Apple might be rich but they have 0 influence, outside of their small cult.