THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1660/

THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

Attached: GEFORCE-GTX-1660-Ti-KV-No-Copy-850px.jpg (850x478, 147K)

Other urls found in this thread:

anandtech.com/show/14071/nvidia-gtx-1660-review-feat-evga-xc-gaming
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

IT'S FUCKING HAPPENING. AMD should just give up on the discrete GPUs and focus on making GPUs for consoles.

Attached: image.jpg (480x360, 36K)

Based indeed, always wanted a 590. 6GB vRAM just doesn't cut it for me.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-03-14-09-13-34(1).jpg (720x1017, 223K)

>Buying AYYMD HOUSEFIRES slower than GTX 1660

TOP KEK, KILL YOURSELF AYYMDPOORFAGS

AMDrones will still attack this, be it for the name or by simply calling everyone who wants it a jew

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: performance-per-watt_1920-1080.png (500x810, 44K)

>6GB vRAM

did you add the v from vPro to VRAM

Uh? This is 1660, not 1660 Ti.
The 590 is actually faster than the 1660 (non-Ti).

Attached: 1552505219271.jpg (937x720, 130K)

>Lying on the internet

Please kill yourself, faggot

Attached: relative-performance_1920-1080.png (500x850, 51K)

AYYMDPOORFAGS like you should know that your fake news shit will be called out

Attached: relative-performance_1920-1080.png (500x850, 50K)

God, the GTX 1660 is going to be glorious. Absolutely mind blowing power efficiency and great value. RTG should just shut down. Even without competition, NVIDIA is still giving us great value products.

see

>muh VRAM
6GB is sufficient.

How is this possible when 1660 Ti is 15% faster than a 590 on every other benchmark? That would make the 1660 as fast or slightly slower than a 590.
Something smells fishy.

>Something smells fishy.
that's just techpowerup, majority of their test games are gimpworks
wait for hardware unboxed benchmarks

Attached: 1552405746365.png (600x600, 477K)

what the fuck is the go-to 1440p/60hz card now? RTX 2060?

Well, /pcbg/ says Vega 56 if it's available for the same price where you live. You're going to run into 6GB memory limitations with some games otherwise.

/pcbg/ autists think any card that can't run AAA games at full ultra is complete shit, I usually assume the tier below what they suggest is sufficient

From benchmarks I've seen, 2060 and vega 56 are pretty evenly matched and the vega is like £50 more in the UK

anandtech.com/show/14071/nvidia-gtx-1660-review-feat-evga-xc-gaming

>As for NVIDIA’s loyal opposition, the launch of the GTX 1660 will continue to put pressure on AMD’s aging Polaris video cards. The GTX 1660 is faster than all of them – including the fastest RX 590 – so AMD and its board partners will have little choice but to cut prices. This means AMD can try to position their cards as spoilers to the GTX 1660 – and $219 RX 590 cards are already popping up – but they can’t take on NVIDIA in terms of performance or power efficiency.

CRY MOAR, AYYMDPOORFAGS

For real RX 590 is dogshit. I even wonder why AMD released that card. A literal housefire. Don't get me started on Radeon VII 500W hot garbage.

Fuck off NvidiaDrone. AMD is going to be releasing an RTX 2080 Ti killer for $400 in July.

Both cards are good enough for 1440p/ultra/60FPS, Vega just has slightly more memory.
Both can be found for the same price too.

It's pretty bad.
A 30% (if even that) performance improvement after 3 years at a very similar price.
If Navi is half as good as rumored it will totally embarass them.

Should have called it Radeon DCC Watts

>navi leaks
>shills' got job to do
this could be worse faggot. you could've been assigned to shill over at reddit.

Attached: rtx.jpg (1199x1233, 277K)

>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS STILL WAITING FOR POOVI MEME

I like my 1950X build and I wait for Navi and Castle Peak, too.

don't mind those guys. i'll thank you personally for buying amd so i don't have to.

no dude, we buy 14nm gpus in 2019

Attached: l.jpg (300x300, 20K)

DELETE THIS YOU FUCKER

No need to samefag, nobody will give a fuck about your kikpowerup benchmarks anyways.

>Buying 7nm 300W HOUSEFIRES GPU that is SLOWER than 16nm GPU from 2017

TOP KEK, AYYMDPOORFAGS

Poor Turing!!!!

>It only matters if AMD is in the lead!11!

>6GB
>slower than a fucking 980Ti
LMAO

Attached: nVidiots are Cucks.png (853x480, 248K)

>GDDR5
at that price-point this is a rip-off, but whatever

it only matters if it's unbiased*

> The only unbiased reviewer is hardware unboxed

Have you considered the possibility that hardware unboxed might be slightly biased?

post the one where 1660 is marginally the same as 1060 just for keks. i believe its from Hardware unboxed too.

>coping this hard
Better sell your stock rajesh, or you'll stay in the slum for much longer

Yep, 2060 is still the go to card.

In what way does it affect the value of the card whether it uses GDDR5 or GDDR6?
The performance is better than all other cards in that pricerange.

because bandwidth will bottleneck it disproportionately, compared to the Ti
I also hate this modern trend of eating shit over supposed value, when it costs Nvidia jack shit to make these things, considering GDDR5 increases their margins

>5-10% faster than the 590
>less than fucking HALF the power draw

This is embarrassing. There is no recovering from this type of deficit.

Attached: untitled-22.png (686x979, 82K)

>coping
Do you know what that word means?

Could you please provide an actual example of that happening in an actual game?

Could you please go back to /v/?
Why the fuck do I need to spoonfeed mongoloids about what happens at higher resolutions?

>Why the fuck do I need to spoonfeed mongoloids about what happens at higher resolutions?
Because this card isn't necessarily aimed at people playing at 4K?
Because higher resolutions doesn't necessarily require more bandwidth/FLOP (often the opposite thanks to memory compression)?
Because the GTX 1660 has only slightly less bandwidth/FLOP than an RTX 2080?

THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

r/AMD imploding again just like when they saw the GTX 1660 Ti benchmarks

Go back then.

>6GB VRAM
>The current year

1680 when? I want something for 1440p