Based AMD waking up to the fact of how ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS it is to have a separate mini computer inside your...

>based AMD waking up to the fact of how ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS it is to have a separate mini computer inside your computer that only handles graphics
If Ryzen 3000 moves the allocated RAM limit to something more decent like 8 gigs then graphics card will be going the way of physics cards

Attached: 82446-raven-am4-ryzen-5-vega-pib-left-facing-1260x709[1].png (1260x709, 284K)

>putting two hottest computer components in one place
>good idea
Delid yourself, OP.

Stop being a retarded caveman
The future is here

>"x is better than y"
>why
>"because uhhh y is old"
>"hurr"

I have to admit, now that I've grown out of needing to play the latest and greatest AAA casinos, the Ryzen APUs are starting to look really attractive.

Even at 8gb its still bottlenecked by speed of ram and. Overall bandwith

lets stick a gimped version of the component that becomes outdated the fastest on the one that becomes outdated the slowest. great idea. though it's amd so it was already outdated years before release.

Bandwidth isn't everything, GDDR5 is only slightly inferior to HBM2 despite the laughable bandwidth when compared

>GDDR5 is only slightly inferior to HBM2
>twice is slightly

There are alternative solution to this. But OP has a point.

Apus are getting there. And you can always make the socket bigger and have a better cooler. Overall it will cut down on cost compared to a dedicated GPU.

On the desktop there will always be a need for multiple gpus, especially with the latest AI meme. Outside desktops iGPUs are already the standard.

Latency is as important as bandwidth to gpu's
vii runs the way it does because hbm has very low latency

Yeah, that's nice, but it's not what APUs use.

Can we have it big enough tho?

Attached: 1542375193690.jpg (1080x1095, 144K)

There are low-end/ mobile GPUs out there whose GDDR5 versions have 50+% more performance than their DDR3 counterparts

Welp I guess you should have each core on its own chip too then.

AMD is already doing this.

>If Ryzen 3000 moves the allocated RAM limit to something more decent like 8 gigs
The real question is why there is a separate allocation for the GPU to begin with. Why wouldn't it just use arbitrary pointers into system memory and let the OS manage it with arbitrary granularity?

Damn reviewbrah looking cute

w... what?

Attached: 1535588951436.jpg (640x480, 34K)

Because it'd be unoptimized as fuck
VRAM has different needs than RAM