Is it /our/ search engine?
Quant
Other urls found in this thread:
about.qwant.com
twitter.com
twitter.com
I like startpage.
i use duckduckgo.com/lite
I use a Ecosia, Yandex and chiru.no
No.
Quant, searx or start page are all fine. CuckCuckNo is just another botnet.
Proofs or fuck off.
It's at least mine.
Nah.
I use Yandex/Bing/searx.me depending on situation.
ddg is ran by feds for pedos
Proofs or fuck off.
Try searx if you think everything is botnet
I use ChadChadGo
searx as default
bing for media
google when the others fail
No. It's based in France and is therefore under French and EU legislation. Their "privacy" and "unfiltered" results claims are bullshit. They have already censored their results following government request.
fuck off shill
good goys
I use it so yes it is
confirmed trash
kek
".biz"
Whoa really makes me think.
They send all your requests to Microsoft Bing for ads: about.qwant.com
>They have already censored their results following government request.
Source?
Qwant and other non-google search engines are pure placebo effect if you're some fucking retard still using chrome or firefox.
I can't believe this bullshit image is still being posted here. Anyone with basic tech knowledge knows it's absolute brain damaged bullshit.
It's literally bing. Might as well just use bing/yandex combo.
Look at this master troll right here.
>claimes thing
>post link that says the opposite as proof
it run on Amazon botnet, in the US territory
Qwant run on EU servers
You're right. It uses Bing. The point of using Quant is using Bing without being spied on by Bing.
Startpage for example works the same way. It uses Google.
En avant Guingamp !
i'll give it a shot.
>OH NO NO NO NO NO the website I just connected to knows my IP!!! BOTNET!!!
>Trusting France
oh no no no no
ITT: Google employees astroturfing against privacy rivals.
>hosted inside US which has mandatory data save law (else they can't do business)
>Owner and founder has record of collecting as much private data as possible and then bulk selling it
>ddg homepage employed multiple different tracking scripts and was only removed after people complained
Anyone using anything but startpage for """"privacy"""" is either a glow in the dark shill or 12 years old.
What are you even talking about?
...
>Source
Here's the guy in charge of legal matters at Qwant, bragging about how Qwant is better at censoring than Google.
twitter.com
He's replying to a (((journalist))) that complained about how "démocratie participative" (basically the french daily stormer) was at the top of the results even though the site is blocked in france.
Then how do you justify using Startpage, given that it just use Google results? Google is known to censor search and image results. Do you really want your view of the world and the internet to be shaped solely by a massive, 'progressive' megacorporation?
Imagine not using Searx