OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
32 CORES LOSING TO 28 CORES
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Zachary Gomez
Robert Flores
>Intel costs 1.7 times as much as the AMD.
>Only marginally faster in certain workloads.
I don't understand how this is supposed to look good.
Sebastian Howard
HMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Leo Roberts
Now post the 1200w chiller to cool the Xeon.
Elijah Ortiz
28 cores at 3.8ghz beats 32 cores at 3ghz (26% margin) by less than 3%, and for only 70% more money! Wow!
Ryan Clark
>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS WITH NO CPUS, NO GPUS AND NO DRIVERS BTFO
Lucas Powell
(you)
Robert Cruz
You retard understand that companys always go for the price/Performance rating. They will always choose amd if it gives them three Threadrippers for the price of two xeons
Elijah Jackson
You're not shilling hard enough ranjeet, Ryzen is still outselling Intel.
Liam Nelson
>Comparing the xeon cpus to Threadripper
>not Ebyn aka. the cpus in the same market.
Why are intcels so retarded?