OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

32 CORES LOSING TO 28 CORES

Attached: cinebench_r20_nt-100790243-orig.jpg (1775x1142, 117K)

>Intel costs 1.7 times as much as the AMD.
>Only marginally faster in certain workloads.
I don't understand how this is supposed to look good.

HMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Attached: untitled-12.png (678x924, 57K)

Now post the 1200w chiller to cool the Xeon.

28 cores at 3.8ghz beats 32 cores at 3ghz (26% margin) by less than 3%, and for only 70% more money! Wow!

>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS WITH NO CPUS, NO GPUS AND NO DRIVERS BTFO

(you)

You retard understand that companys always go for the price/Performance rating. They will always choose amd if it gives them three Threadrippers for the price of two xeons

You're not shilling hard enough ranjeet, Ryzen is still outselling Intel.

>Comparing the xeon cpus to Threadripper
>not Ebyn aka. the cpus in the same market.
Why are intcels so retarded?

dubspost best post INTCELS ITODDLER-TIER BTFO

Intelbench (((r20)))

oops, looks you shot your wad too early, way to fail. -0.20 rupees deducted from your Intel shill account Rajeet.

NOT FAIR!

Attached: 6.png (552x661, 288K)

>force enables avx256 on avx 256 crippled cpus
>still manages to win by a small margin

>Boss tells me to buy new servers for the office
>Buy Xeon 28 core machines 'cause Tom told me to
>Get fired for buying hot loud power hungry expensive crap
>The next day our private keys get leaked through a new zero day TLB exploit
>Now also being sued for professional negligence for the security breach

F-FUCK AMDFAGS

Attached: 1528561186864.png (1070x601, 495K)

is this cinebench on Windows? You know, the OS that can't handle NUMA based core allocation? The reason why the 2990WX wasn't popular?

Do rupees have fractional amounts? I thought it worked like yen, where an individual whole unit is practically worthless.

It has but yes practically useless.

Oof.

delid and delap this kind sir
do the needful and support israel
show bobs and vagana

>>Comparing the xeon cpus to Threadripper
xeon w isn't a server chip

delet

Cinebench is alright (probably works around Windows' shitty scheduler somehow), but R20 is an AVX benchmark, so Intel will obviously win until Zen 2 comes out. but when Zen 2 starts topping the charts Cinebench will be (((updated))) again and we'll have threads like these once more

I mean, it will be (((updated))) to use AVX-512 instead of AVX2, don't believe AMD will ever waste time with this shit unless they have to

Attached: 1517357039604.jpg (410x375, 40K)

running the benchmark multiple times on a cpu with a neural network branch predictor is cheating

> threadripper vs xeon
????

delid delap and apply chiller :)

what actually uses more then one core?

Attached: A82A4BD4-4721-4D56-8339-007EBB9398BD.jpg (612x716, 313K)

Render farms

muh dick

Attached: e00.jpg (640x498, 94K)

Does your dick scale linearly when using more cores?

AVX 512 for you.

>not listed
>all 9th gen intel CPUs
>all xeons

supercalculator to solve your mother weight

guaranteed replies

even intel hasn't delivered on avx512 I think

Your operating system kernel

Not in pajeetland

>longer bar indicate higher performance
Wow, sure sounds legit!

based israel

COPE

Attached: potato faces.jpg (480x480, 32K)

>comparing two CPUs meant for different things with a benchmark that heavily favors Intel products
They're trying pretty damn hard

Oh look, r20 favors intel more than r15. Intel helped develop r20. Coincidence?

SHUT UP GOY