Why can't Windows and Linux look this good?

Why can't Windows and Linux look this good?

Attached: WzmtAnu.jpg (1920x1080, 129K)

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/b2fgij/i3gaps_with_blur/
1drv.ms/f/s!AqXIgPGILShBobU_bvvoAlBsQCfYWA
motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3kgw83/is-adobes-creative-cloud-too-powerful-for-its-own-good
imgur.com/TfOtFBr
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

You can rice GNU/Linux to look however you want

Riportalo indietro, mutumbo

That's a terrible misunderstanding of UI design and widget toolkits and I'm not even a macfag.
'Ricing' doesn't solve fundamental issues.

>elementary os

Attached: elementary-os-0-5-juno-gnu-linux-distro-could-use-ubuntu-s-snappy-technologies-518038-2.jpg (1440x900, 165K)

I'll be honest that looks way better than MacOS.
OP is a faggot

Are you too lazy to install linux and make it look better than macOS

Attached: 6e9c23b.jpg (1366x2304, 452K)

Linux can be made to look exactly like that...if you like smoking cocks.

>Windows 10 looks like that?
WOAH!!!

Attached: windows-10-1903-april2019-19h1.jpg (1680x1050, 125K)

the fuck is up with windows and their love for eye piercing contrasts? It makes zero sense to have hard blacks in an user interface.

Based and ricepilled

>looks
kys /fa/ggot

How did you pajeet make nautilus blur? Or is it just simple transparency?

Attached: 6e9c23b_1.jpg (184x181, 8K)

I don't use bloatjaro
It's from r/unixporn
reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/b2fgij/i3gaps_with_blur/

based

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-03-18 at 10.40.26.png (1920x1080, 2.85M)

this
I had a windows phone for around 2 years and grew to hate the black all over the UI. Its fucking horrid, especially when they pair it with your "highlight" colour or whatever they call it. Looks like ass.

God how much I hate osx. Literally garbage-tier OS. It's for people more autistic t'han linux users

Porco dio

Linux is a kernel. It has no graphical interface.

Everything looks utterly bad. Windows is ad-ridden, inconsistent, Linux DE's won't ever surpass Mac in terms of usability and design. It'll be always in the state of "WIP".

Based, macOS is Litteraly the only usable desktop

ackshully: framebuffer

What is the TTY interface then if not a graphical interface?
>interface to a graphical display with control codes and user input
I don't think you understand what you're talking about.

Indeed, ricing won't fix fundamental issues mac has, so you'd better avoid it.

hilarious
/thread

You have to 18 to post here.

have you ever considered...
that the pajeets who work and run microsoft...
don't know what they are doing?

TTY is serial communication. It does not require a display of any verity. You can have two PCs communicate with one another over TTY and never have a display in the process (also called a null modem at times). When you're on a command line on a PC that is a TTY loopback.

This is exactly what gnome looks like...

That sounds like a game of semantics then, technically everything is a binary interface according to the kernel, but if I make the kernel draw an image on a physical tty through my input on the same device, I'm counting that as a graphical interface in that instance.

The kernel is the interface which commands the blitting, based on the input in this case.

Lmao. If you want to look Linux like Windows just use Windows. Otherwise love Linux and don’t complain.

Looks like shit honestly.
MacOS looks slick and professional.

>:3 uwu
>better than anything
I'd rather use GNOME than use the gayest tiling manager ever made.
Use BSPWM or a dwm-based wm

You only think its professional because of how they made you their bitch with high prices

They can look x times better libtard
Ever heard of ricing?

but muh gaymes tho

But yeah, macOS looks (and works) the best. A macOS clone is not a wallpaper, a dock and a global menu, and that's what loonix users fuck up the most.

>That sounds like a game of semantics then,
Its not. "TTY" has implicit ways of communication over serial. Its how we interfaced with computers in the 50s and on using teletype machines, its literally the same serial communication for the past 60+ years. Get it, TTY, TeleTYpe. This is how it was done before actual displays existed for computers, and its still done the exact same way today with local loopbacks.

What exactly is stopping most Linux DEs to be customized to look exactly like this? What exactly is the purpose of someone who has absolutely no choice in customization over his DE to compare himself to others other than hopelessly trying to hide his dullness?

Deepin exists

Attached: DeepinScreenshot_20181126142357.png (1600x900, 1.01M)

I'm looking for something other than the wallpaper that looks good.

>muh dock
>muh flashy mac icons
Zoomer spotted. I just use xfce.
>crack sip
Yep now that's a DE

Attached: IMG_1137.jpg (250x229, 10K)

Because every compositor on Linux is a piece of utter garbage. That, and macOS frankly has like 700 functions for the mouse that mostly require keyboard shortcuts on linux DEs. And windows is so ancient it doesn't even have some of those functions, like being able to create a new folder with selected items or create a folder where files get processed automatically after dragging them there.

Wallpaper pls

>if you want to look Linux like
dumb eslposter

No one thinks this actually looks good right?

>(((buttons)))
>(((icons)))
>(((dOcK)))
>(((menubar)))
kys

On most open source OSes, you can install a window manager that can look like anything you want, including the superior on every way Mac OS platinum.

Attached: KDE platinum.jpg (1280x1024, 147K)

>Otherwise love Linux
Love Lainux

But that looks like shit
the icons are obtrusive

I think it looks better than macOS. Unfortunately the file manager is shit, you need hacks to get indicators in the top bar and the developers are anal to their users.
An example of that is requiring donations to have the software from their app center update automatically.
They're good designers, but without someone with a strong free software vision behind their project, I think it will keep pushing anti-features.

Looks is the only thing Mac still has going for it, and even there Windows and Linux are catching up

Smetti di fare shitposting, Lorenzo.

>this is considered good design by freetards

Any Linux distribution can not look as good as macOS. One time a some guy apparently made his own DE called Flurry which didn't look like shit but then he **suddenly** lost all of his data including the source code but he lost it right after whoring for karma on Jow Forumsunixporn
pic related, one of the "screenshots" of Flurry

Attached: karmawhore.png (2560x1440, 1.65M)

Looks like shit

Maybe he was just a graphic designer and made up that story.

yeah the blur eveyrfuckingwhere looks like shit but if it was removed and it would be tweaked a bit it would look good

>retarded colored circles
>look good
Mac OS looked great when it was named System, but now it looks like shit.

>Boasting about the only redeeming quality of the mac, even though it's still beaten by linux.

Enjoy your planned obsolescence and $2,799 repair boys.

You know that you can remove the ads in Windows 10 with we literally copy pasting a couple Powershell commands. Right?

GUI on Linux distros can be made to look exactly like MacOS to the pixel, including transitions and features, except nobody does it because Apple design is dogshit just like their hardware.

based

Why can't ios and windows look this good

Attached: twm-keppler.gif (1024x768, 31K)

Icon pack bro?

>fagOS
>usable

Attached: 1542727725213.png (696x938, 456K)

Attached: 01L.jpg (1932x1280, 657K)

It looks okay when you adjust the colors.

Attached: Untitled-1.jpg (1920x1080, 584K)

Papirus

>gray text on gray background
sasuga freetards

Thanks!

the only thing i want is the fucking font rendering for windows

GIVE ME THAT FUCKING WALLPAPER RIGHT NOW o.O

I think this DE is called KDE user.

puke.jpg

>deepin
literally aero clone

Attached: 1544431505710.png (1600x900, 1.2M)

>i-it's just a few weeks guys and t-the data recovery team will recover all the source code, trust me go- I mean guys, it's totally real!

Attached: 1450258151626.jpg (439x290, 35K)

Right. I even use LTSC on my workstation. Why do I have to manually go through the mess in order to remove unwanted behaviour?

I've got the entire collection if you want it
1drv.ms/f/s!AqXIgPGILShBobU_bvvoAlBsQCfYWA

That looks like shit and it's entirely non-functional. At least Windows and KDE on Linux use a taskbar style desktop. That dock and menu bar are a huge waste of space. Even Unity on Ubuntu pulled off the dock better by sticking it on the side.

Attached: akm4VQdk_700w_0.jpg (326x294, 17K)

So move it to the side. The dock is actually quite functional, allowing you to open files in any application just by dragging and dropping

>average manjaro user

KEK

.. with a superior distro under it
what's not to like?

It's Chinese, to begin with.

>recently added
botnet
>taskbar
google botnet
sjw botnet
4x gaming botnet
only good thing at whole screen
2x adobe botnet
...
>systray
botnet, botnet, botnet
>os
botnet: the worse version

Attached: 1543583163006.jpg (640x480, 293K)

It has to be functional rather than pretty.

Attached: yourcomment.webm (318x208, 284K)

Drag and drop is probably the shittiest "feature" in all of computing.

TOP KEK
btw, you can use kvantum for transparency, or compton might work

christ that looks bad
windows 7 was the last good looking version of windows
it only goes downhill from there

>steam
>good
leave, richard impersonator

F O R M O V E R F U N C T I O N

what the fuck is wrong with you freetard, that shit is digusting. god i swear freetards are fuckin in denial

macos has such ugly app icons, they honestly ruin the look of the whole os

>motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3kgw83/is-adobes-creative-cloud-too-powerful-for-its-own-good
>macOS has a dumpster-tier window manager
>users blame adobe
you can't make this shit up

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-03-18 13-35-48.png (672x197, 24K)

Not him but here you go : imgur.com/TfOtFBr

meant musicbee, but do go on

+1

experimenting with different window managers is shit and styling your own takes too long.

but never better than macOS. fact.

facts are subjective. reality is how i define it.