Why isn't any other language even close to being as good as this one?
C++
Hudson Wood
Other urls found in this thread:
Asher Reed
Because you're an idiot and you conflate "good" with "sprawling clusterfuck of a kitchen-sink language that has a half-ass implementation of every programming concept ever invented bolted onto it"
Grayson Powell
found the Pajeet
Jayden Foster
C++ doesn't really offer anything C can't do, yet it's easily 10x as complex
Carson Hernandez
and that's a good thing
Brody Gonzalez
except being meta-programming framework more powerful than any Lisp
Cooper Price
Brainlet
Isaiah Torres
Citation needed
Jeremiah Hernandez
>OOP
Yikes!
Angel Jones
True, we can just asm, void * and ifdef everything
Colton Wright
t. Pajeet
Jaxson Phillips
OOP is the most Pajeet thing going. It's C or nothing as far as I'm concerned.
Connor Brown
It's C but with additions (not to be confused with a plus). It is literal bloat, a tumor latched onto C. It adds so many things that just aren't necessary unless you're a complete tool. Object orientation is a paradigm, you shouldn't need a new language to implement it. All the safety tools are stupid and complex and if you really wanted safety, then why are using a memory managed language in the first place? That's like owning a nerf gun modified to shoot real bullets, at that point just buy a real gun.
Mason Bailey
>t is literal bloat, a tumor latched onto C.
this. the compile times are awful and the templates bloat up the executables. C++ more like Cancer++ hahahahahahahahahahaha
Julian Diaz
Why did the C language not develop something like a standard object system library? I know it's possible, and it seems like it would have been a better thing than making a whole new language
James Powell
Because C programmers are generally smarter than OOP monkeys, so they never needed a "standard object system library".
Asher Allen
you have processes and threads, why would you need objects
why would you reimplement wheel on every possible layer
Sebastian Phillips
>C++ doesn't really offer anything C can't do,
LMAO the absolute state of Jow Forums
John Ramirez
can't believe there's this many retards who fell for the suckless cargo cult here
all just mindlessly parroting the trendy hipster opinions you see on /dpt/ posted next to anime girls while never having worked on a non-trivial piece of software in your life
Camden Walker
python is almost there though.
William Long
>probably baiting for the (You)s
>can't be sure though because some C-tards are actually this brainlet
Angel James
Sanjeev, please go.
Blake Gray
>mom, I posted it again!
Chase Wilson
kek
Jace Rivera
>C++ doesn't really offer anything C can't do
vacuous statement from a cnile brainlet as usual
Logan Lewis
because Dennis Ritchie
Isaac Ward
pajeets trying to protect their jobs
Levi Evans
>tfw you reach C++ nirvana and start to look down at every other programming language
Blake Robinson
being this retarded...
this
Elijah Gonzalez
I'm almost there brother. I was almost put off from C++ because of all of the shit people talk about it, but now I'm on the brink of C++ enlightenment
Robert Sanders
In my area, no company is hiring for it except embedded, defense contractors and a few HPT and AAA game studios.
C++ is the most powerful language currently in the sense that it can do everything you want. Except we have to look at the cons too and that list is huge.
Just the awful build tools, undefined behaviors and incomprehensible error messages alone are enough to always avoid using the language if possible.
Also, it's literally impossible to reach "C++ nirvana", you will never ever master the language and you will always fall into traps that will make you waste hours of your life debugging, stop kidding yourself.
Nathan Green
I used to program with C++, but now I prefer common lisp
Gabriel Watson
based_cast