Have you changed your DNS? I am using 1.1.1.1 right now, but it is botnet

>adguard dns ping 200ms
>ping 1.1.1.1 40ms
Just use ublock origin or hosts if you hate ads

I'm on quad9

/etc/hosts

mines faster on the secondary DNS from cloudfare

Attached: 1538894940565.png (449x194, 6K)

>it is botnet
It's one of the few DNS providers that outright state that they don't keep logs.

But if I ping my ISP DNS directly its the fastest ever. 1ms

Attached: 1524589251225.png (459x190, 6K)

... That's not your ISP, that's your router.

Thank you for making me laugh.

oh maybe this then, still the fastest than cloudfare

Attached: 1522591036520.png (459x190, 6K)

Not him but, really?

My DNS is literally 192.168.0.1:

# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 192.168.0.1

Are you both retarded ? Why are the two of you even on Jow Forums ?

I mean for the first one posting the pictures, I can believe he's trolling he posted 2, but you're just taking the bait.

How I can check ping of my dns?

ping 192.168.1.1

>winblows
Ping (your dns)
>linux
Ping (your dns)
Dig google.com @(your dns)

ipconfig /all | findstr "DNS\ Servers" says my dns is 192.168.0.1 wtf?

It also does for me, look at I don't get it.

My DNS is 4 times faster than 1.1.1.1

Attached: dns.png (468x426, 23K)

ISP DNS > BOTNET (Google, Cloudflare, Quad9) DNS
faster and more secure & privacy friendly

why the fuck am i paying comcast $80/m

try again with tracert

find your nearest OpenNIC server

fk off windowsfag that's your router ip

here

Attached: tracert.png (758x368, 17K)

Cloudflare dns is faster than isp dns desu

Not in Finland desu.

1.1.1.1 isn’t a botnet, u meant 8.8.8.8

So you goons realize that any address that starts with 192.168.x.x are private? Meaning it's special to you. You guys are pinging your modem (router) that is connected to our ISP so of course your getting low latency.

But the router is using the ISP DNS by default, right? So one could use 1.1.1.1 as the first DNS on a computer and 192.168.x.x as the backup DNS.

JFC what is this awful font you are using for your terminal

It really depends on how you configure the router. You can configure it to use 1.1.1.1 and you can make it follow the ISP DNS (which is the default usually)

However when you do ping 192.168.x.x you do not ping the ISP DNS, you ping only the router, the DNS is never called for because there is no need for one in order to ping 192.168 adress.

If you want to ping the ISP DNS you have to find the ISP DNS address.

>Everything caches DNS queries, after the first resolution laters ones are done from cache.
False.
I tried crawling a website using "1.1.1.1" and got constant resolution errors after ~50 queries.

My Finnish ISP DNS is still much better than cloudflare.

Attached: isp dns.png (797x452, 26K)

it is very possible especially if you're close to your ISP (or have an optic connection to their centre), I never said it wasn't.

The posts in this thread make me want to kill myself. But because I've taken the bait - if you want to measure DNS lookup performance use a DNS lookup tool like dig and don't just ping your router you fucking mongoloids
The answer to the op's original question is running a recursive bind server on your network. Your ISP will be able to intercept all your dns queries in the clear but it's still probably less botnet than cloudflare or google

>you piece of shit

Attached: peasant-whipping-his-donkey-dated-1628-medium-etching-museum-national-gallery-of-art-washington-dc-a (1300x1018, 414K)

yeeeah, i'm gonna stick with the friendly neighbourhood google

Attached: Pingpingping.png (542x917, 193K)

try again ;)

Wrong picture

Yeah I have optic 100/100 Mbs internet.

Attached: tracert ips.png (839x422, 22K)

I use 8.8.8.8

>blog.uncensoreddns.org/dns-servers/
Been using that one myself since it was posted by an user here, no problems encountered in more than a year of usage, it's decently fast for me and no logs are kept.

>Just use ublock origin or hosts if you hate ads
It's not about hating ads, it's about not trusting CloudFare... but AdGuard DNS blocking ads on phone apps when I'm using my Wifi is pretty good.

don't come crying about how google knows all your browsing habits, user

baka ausfags cant do this bc we get cucked by telstra who blocks anything at the drop of a hat

Pings are even lower with Metro-E fiber.

Ping doesn't matter, lookup performance does.
grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm

Download Blokada, you can activate 1.1.1.1 dns and block ads in one app.

77.88.8.8
77.88.8.1

Attached: Yandex_logo_en.svg.png (1280x502, 39K)

Caching happen at multiple layers. Your own DNS resolver could be at fault, or somewhere upstream.

>no logs are kept
is there transport layer encryption?

This is the correct answer.

>1 new post
Do the root servers support transport layer encryption?

But latencies are at best 40x of ISP's ones.

Just add all relevant domains into your hosts file and set 0.0.0.0 as your DNS

How does cloudflare make money on this?

Is Quad9 a good choice? Seems faster than all OpenNIC and dnswatch servers.

selling data, just like any other big tech company

>APNIC Labs is partnering with Cloudflare for a joint research project relating to the operation of the DNS. I’d like to explain our motivation in entering into this research project

>The joint research project involves the operation of an open public DNS resolution service using IPv4 address prefixes that the APNIC Address Policy SIG has set aside for research purposes. This project will provide APNIC Labs with unique opportunity to gain some valuable insight into the query behaviour of the DNS in today’s Internet and will allow us to further our existing research activities in looking at the DNS.