Muh AI

>muh AI

Attached: file.png (832x272, 45K)

*yeah yeah*

HOLY BOEING

YOUVE BEEN UP TOO LONG IN THE MIDNIGHT SKY

OH WONT YOU NOSE DIVE AND DIIIIEEEEE

*737 max 8*

RIDE THE MCAS

IT CANT TELL THE ANGLE BUT ASSUMES ITS UP
OH GOD YOUR SENSORS FUCKED UUUPPP

HOLY DIVAAAAH
AAAAAAAH
AHHHHHHH

*BBBOOOOOOOOM*

boeing 737 MAX CARNAGE

>implying humans aren't AI

>ai
wow its nothing

>aviation experts made a prediction about automation
That sounds pretty worthless

The fuck do they mean 15 years, I want to see their methodology

>Pilots too stupid to flip a switch to disengage power to the elevator trim.

Don't get me wrong, having the MCAS system rely totally on ONE sensor is stupid.

But the pilots were equally stupid for not knowing how to turn off the trim system.

ai is a minor and planes not crashing is the age of consent

Just give me a simple little warbird with a GPS strapped on it and I'll fly myself, fuck the puke stained sardine-barrel airliners.

Attached: 24321887865_6c7993ed7a_o.jpg (2048x1365, 964K)

>guise, there will be plane crashes in the future

damn, how did they see this coming ?

You get disasters either way. Do you want your disasters to be caused by humans that are unreliability and difficult to train and test or by software that can be fixed in a week, rigorosuly designed and tested and that doesn't degrade over time?

The ozone layer will collapse and we'll all be dead in 20 years.

>software that can be fixed in a week, rigorosuly designed and tested and that doesn't degrade over time?
Which is written by poorly trained coders. Engineers will write the scope of works and the architecture but undergraduate interns write the code and test it.

Ron Flockhart.

> 0 Commercial airliner crashes in 2017
> Commercial airliners are literally safer than they've ever been

See, planes are just too smart these days, we have to make them less smart. Trust me, I'm a mechanic. I work on machines all the time and I tell you, they're just too automated!

Attached: p19f83.jpg (645x588, 33K)

What are you talking about? Airplane software follows strict coding standards, it's formally verified, tested and audited. Doesn't matter if it's written by undergraduates, the validation process is designed to not let erros slip through.

"Aviation experts". Not AI experts.

AI is a meme but flying a plane is not that hard. t. AI maker

im not flying on any planes until i can verify the code is actually error free

youd be an absolute sucker to fly on a plane and trust your life to code SOMEONE ELSE has decided YOU arent allowed to see

am i baiting you into agreeing with richard matthew stallman, creator of the gnu isnot unix operating system: yes

is it working though: yes

Anyone else think the two crashes were NSA kill traps that Russia/China/United 'Airbus" Kingdom exploited to fuck Boeing and force CIA to fix one of their 'crash buttons'?

Don't worry about sliding this, I'll be posting this all over Dissenter.

This desu. This shouldn't be anything unexpected

based and diopilled