How many fps does your terminal emulator get?

Attached: file.png (800x600, 22K)

news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16936181
>At least they have benchmarks to back their claims.
They measure irrelevant metrics like framerate, and do not measure latency,. which is what actually matters.

enough

>her (male)

Konsole here.
> time seq 1000000
real 0m1.815s
user 0m0.016s
sys 0m0.764s

No idea why tf would /dev/null make any sense to test, but here you go.
> time seq 1000000 > /dev/null
real 0m0.006s
user 0m0.006s
sys 0m0.000s

it makes it more faster, like who would actually want all that garbage to print and slow down his terminal emulator?
I was just trollin basically, posting results from a web browser terminal emulator now

Attached: file.png (2560x1410, 192K)

i lock mine at 24

nice

or as ive recently taken to calling it, male+stockings

real 0m0.849s
user 0m0.011s
sys 0m0.407s

tripfags get the rope first

Second run:
real 0m0.812s
user 0m0.007s
sys 0m0.398s

(xfce4-terminal)

Tilix:
real 0m0.998s
user 0m0.015s
sys 0m0.397s

>inb4 dumb phoneposter

Attached: Screenshot_2019-03-29-14-30-33-115_com.termux.png (1080x2160, 90K)

what a DUMB phoneposter

Do I win?
real 0m27.374s
user 0m0.021s
sys 0m0.840s

i3 -> st -> dash -> time -p seq 1000000 > /dev/null
real 0.03
user 0.03
sys 0.00

this is pointless its a terminal emulator it should be as minimal as possible

without /dev/null
real 1.11
user 0.03
sys 0.86

xfce terminal in i3:
real 0m1.198s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m0.520s

oh, and into /dev/null
real 0m0.010s
user 0m0.008s
sys 0m0.000s