Is he, dare I say it, based and red pilled?

this is a good thing

Redpilled, yes. Certainly not based.
He's a self-proclaimed freedom fighter but also an ideological extremist, which makes him a walking contradiction. Technological freedom is great, but it should be a choice and not something to be forced on others if it's not what they truly desire.

No. He's a moonbat crazy fucking socialist.

in my school, kids used to just vanish. If you asked about them no one would say a thing. Pretty soon I found out everyone who had a girlfriend was being sent to jail. We were all 12-14.
>they were all immediately committed as sex offenders

My superintendent said that since they had already touched children, they will only want to keep touching children after they grow up.

Thats actually GNU/Pedo, or as I like to call it, GNU + Pedos.

Only reason to use linux btw

Attached: 1551219686809.jpg (646x769, 158K)

in my school so many students were getting caught with images that the teachers would encourage other students to rape and beat them for being a pedo.

The feminists were LITERALLY behind it.

Fair enough, I didn't really express my point well.
The danger that many people see in pedophilia is a power imbalance, basically adults taking advantage of young children.
A 15 year old having sex might be against your views but it would not be what most people see as pedophilia.
Therefore RMS' point about a baby growing up is really irrelevant, unless that young person has sex with a much older person or someone who has authority over her.
I think he misses the point that most people make in that second statement.

traditionally, marriage grants a man power over his wife, but this is quite different from the relationship between a pedophile and his prey.
there is nothing inherently wrong with fucking children. in muslim cultures, men have sex with girls much younger than themselves. the difference is that there is a level of commitment. you must marry the young girls to have sex with them. under sharia law, if you rape a woman, you are forced to marry her. marriage exists to allow people to raise children. sex outside of marriage is harmful to society, and that is why it is not allowed.
this is precisely the problem with pedophilia. pedophiles view the children they have sex with not as partners but as a sex objects. the problem with pedophiles isn't strictly that they are fucking children but that they are perverted.
it seems that richard stallman finds it acceptable to engage in sex outside of marriage, and that is where he is wrong.

Attached: 1542132518550.gif (500x417, 1.32M)

I would have to see the context.
I'm of the opinion that sex with prepubescent kids is wrong, but sex after puberty began is fine. There should be no universal age of consent, each body has different development.

>yfw 18 year olds have their lives permanently destroyed and ruined for having sex with 17 year olds
really makes me think

Attached: 1545771985926.jpg (1075x1037, 67K)

I thought that was a Steven Bonnell quote

Attached: Hes+just+a+gardenvariety+turbo+manlet+_df36e46dae171e9001affd54585acbe1.jpg (535x800, 99K)

Yeah, we all know kids have a well developed brain, especially the frontal lobe, and are fully capable of making sound, rational, and consenting choices for themselves regarding sex in a way which would never be harmful for them.

Which is why adults should be allowed to get "consent" from kids so they can fuck them.

Makes perfect sense. Nothing wrong here at all.

How do you propose to solve the problem that the law is ultimately an arbitrary line in the sand? Romeo and Juliet laws doe exist as well.

yes, kind of
i wouldn't touch that subject with a 10 foot pole though, he's retarded

>laws
shiggy diggy

Attached: AnCap.png (800x734, 481K)

>but it should be a choice and not something to be forced on others if it's not what they truly desire.
Oh yeah, FOSS = communism meme. Surely every piece of software you use is FOSS and there are no alternatives. And of course you're forced to use it. That's how it works, right?

Attached: 1509044210040.png (546x700, 322K)

By not making it retarded. In Germany a 99 year old man can have sex with a 16 year old youg woman, no questions asked.
A 17 year old boy can have sex with a 14 year old, no questions asked.
We also don't have the same concept of "age of consent" an American user told me that all sex you have with a 17 year old when you are 25 is rape because well, she didn't consent did she? He thought (and I asked him to clarify this several times) that an actual rapist, forcing the girl, and a man having consentual sex with her were the same, because well, there was no legal consent in both cases.

I never understood these adulthood and consent laws. It doesn't help that the law clearly isn't the same for everyone. For one thing, the age of consent is lower in African countries and we know that the whole continent scores lower on IQ tests.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent
Everything seems arbitrary.
Also, what about Jimmy Savile? Huh? He did what he did even though the entire BBC knew as well as entire England and he got away with it. What about Jimmy Page and David Bowie who slept with the same 14 year old groupie? Nothing ever came of it.
And Jimmy had her forcibly brought to him by the band's manager while they kept their relationship a secret for years. Now what about Pete Townshend? He only kept viewing the content to somehow prove that it at all exists or something to that extent was his excuse. It's that one case in the UK with credit card fraud and the money being used to pay for the material.
If anyone could explain how all of any of this is fair and just, I'm all ears.

Attached: 640px-Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svg.png (640x283, 76K)

All or any*

>Everything seems arbitrary.
Everything is
>fair and just
Even this.

When we talk about fair and just we just mean that everyone follows the same arbitrary rules as everyone else.

Age of consent is a bullshit concept because it can be take too far, in the sense that sex and actual rape will be treated the same.
Protecting minors is good, but sex with a minor and rape of a minor is not the same.
And by minor I mean a young woman, not a toddler.

Why did those people get away with it? Not a fault of the law, a problem with enforcing the law. Happens all the time.

It's considered statuatory rape, not plain rape per se.

From what I read, you basically just support a lower age of consent? Germoney doesn't even have romeo and juliet laws. So your original post of 18 and 17 year old would be the same in germany for a 14 and 13 yo.
>Germany does not have a close-in-age exemption. Close in age exemptions, commonly known as "Romeo and Juliet laws" in theUnited States, are put in place to prevent the prosecution of individuals who engage in consensual sexual activity when both participants are significantly close in age to each other, and one or both partners are below the age of consent.

>Because there is no close-in-age exemption in Germany, it is possible for two individuals both under the age of 14 who willingly engage in intercourse tobothbe prosecuted for statutory rape, although this is rare. Similarly, no protections are reserved for sexual relations in which one participant is a 13 year old and the second is a 14 or 15 year old.
But I guess you were emphasizing the age of the participants, not the fact that one is on a different side of the legal line than the other.

Things that never happened

Could happen had the girl's parents were overprotective.

I really do support Romeo an Julliet laws, I also support very mild (if any) penalties if the sex is truly consentual.
But after a quick search it seems that I might have been wrong about German law. I probably fucked up big time.

maximum Chad desu

is this some american joke i'm to yuropoor to get?

Attached: 1536775145600.jpg (1280x720, 67K)

What the fuck?? Literally just having a gf their same underage was enough for them to get sent away as sex offenders?? Where the fuck do you live where this is allowed?? Are there any news articles made about this??

Attached: 1552014289662.png (640x604, 237K)

Attached: Suggestions.jpg (599x708, 42K)

What matters is whether something is socially acceptable. Regardless of whether it's a crime or not, Savile's transgressions were ignored because it wasn't socially acceptable to persecute him. Same with democrats making dead people vote. Same with Rotherham. Same with slavery in America. All had laws against them, and all had those laws ignored or conveniently interpreted for the sake of currying favour of either the one(s) in question or the public who support them.

I took my gfs virginitg when I was 19 and she was 17
2 years later i believe we are bound for life
Take that amerimutts

Attached: TPG.jpg (2992x2000, 2.21M)

Its way too late for that thanks to american hollywood

Age of consent is 18 in all 50 states. It's a class A felony if you have sex between an adult and a legal minor. It's only really enforced hard for men.

my girlfriend took my virginity when I was 17 and she was 20

this is a retarded thread
you don't sexualize minors because IF they end up making a baby they will not be in a good position to look after it properly
it's about keeping society together, not some jew plot against you

>pedophiles view the children they have sex with not as partners but as a sex objects
Do heterosexual men view women who they have sex with not as partners but as a sex objects?

God I wish I were you.

I took your girlfriends virginity when she was 17 and I was 35

>Where the fuck do you live where this is allowed??
It could be literally anywhere in the west.
By now most of the west thinks that children are only for sex. If you're male and seen in public with a child you're obviously a pretador. The child can be yours or you could be helping them find their parents. Or you could literally just sit on a bench nearby and get years of jail.
The west has been brainwashed into thinking that child sex is some kind of superbly desirable forbidden fruit. Adults are horrified when they see a naked one-year-old at the beach because they can't help but think of all the predators around and how skin is literally illegal. Jow Forums hands out permabans if you post the pictures from Walmart's childrens' clothes section on /b/. Elon Musk thought calling a rescue diver a pedophile was appropriate simply because the diver was in Thailand. Why else would you go to Thailand?

This overt child protection and purism has turned into a cultural disease of fetishization.

she left me after 2 years

Doesn't matter had first sex with oneesan.

Hes objectively right. Only newfags would argue against this.

Fuck off redditors

well hook up culture is a thing, i would say it goes both ways

Stallman is based as fuck. How many people do you know with such big balls that they dare to have opinions on tabu topics like this, knowing that a big part of humanity will play the madman card on them?

The spirit of Jow Forums has always been freedom of speech, no matter how disgusting the topic may be - we did it with the safety web of anonymity, but Stallman's wizard level is higher.

The age of consent is 18 in less than half of the country. It's 16 or 17 in most states.

>How many people do you know with such big balls that they dare to have opinions on tabu topics like this, knowing that a big part of humanity will play the madman card on them?
all of Jow Forums