Quantum encryption libertarian dystopia

>>quantum computing renders classical encryption obsolete
it might, but nobody really knows, they just hypothesise about it. not going to happen any time soon.
>>only quantum encryption is secure against quantum computation
based on fantasy and the make believe
>>can't do quantum encryption at home because it requires insane equipment running at near absolute zero temperatures
the only thing you got right
>>forced to outsource all personal encryption to "the cloud" which is operated by megacorporations
and back to failing.

>Did you enjoy my comment? Remember to like, comment, subscribe, and click the little notification bell so you don't miss out on a comment.
suicide; just do it

Attached: 1531700552320.png (650x450, 644K)

op here the first reply explains everything why are you dingus berries still talking about this

Quantum computers are only better at certain classes of problems, and no better at others. You just need to use algorithms that are just as hard for quantum computers as conventional computers.

For you:
>quantum computing renders classical encryption obsolete
it might, but nobody really knows, they just hypothesise about it. not going to happen any time soon.
>only quantum encryption is secure against quantum computation
based on fantasy and the make believe

>quoting a reply without reading it

Attached: image.png (500x411, 211K)

???
Anythinig quantum is just a buzzword at this point. So, only person who's in the wrong here is OP.

its not a buzzword, you dipshit. its an objective thing. the op is correct except that it misses what is pointed out by the first reply. just google "post-quantum encryption" and shut your stupid idiot mouth

>its not a buzzword, you dipshit. its an objective thing
Cool. But his whole scenario is a fanfic really.
>Even though current, publicly known, experimental quantum computers lack processing power to break any real cryptographic algorithm, many cryptographers are designing new algorithms to prepare for a time when quantum computing becomes a threat.
>In contrast to the threat quantum computing poses to current public-key algorithms, most current symmetric cryptographic algorithms and hash functions are considered to be relatively secure against attacks by quantum computers. While the quantum Grover's algorithm does speed up attacks against symmetric ciphers, doubling the key size can effectively block these attacks.

so nothing changes?
right now privacy on the internet is an impossibility

>ITT retard doesn't know difference between quantum encryption and post-quantum cryptography
>ITT retard doesn't know only symmetric ciphers and hashing is not affected

>classical encryption
Like what, the fucking Caesar cipher? lmao
Consider looking up "classical encryption", shit's broken already.

Many current algorithms are already considered to be quantum resistant unless you have the public key, such as SHA-256. Using a quantum processor renders no benefit without having the public key.

shouldn't it be assumed that anyone can have the public key?

Attached: tok.png (680x682, 328K)