Unironically What is the worst GNU+Linux Distro?

i think this one.

Attached: OpenPepe.png (1200x760, 64K)

arch is fucking useless

>selects not to install yast during the install
>yast is installed anyway
>wants to remove opensuse firefox branding
>zypper tells that firefox depends on that package
>wakes laptop from sleep
>must restart firefox because it can't pick up connection
is this a fucking joke

kek, fuck you nigger

Werks on my machine

Spotted the brainlet. If I could dislike your post I would.

I use Arch btw

Your fortune: Excellent Luck

Attached: 1524380757118.png (688x1430, 156K)

>chooses prebuilt distro with software he doesn't want
>complains about dependencies being installed
>wants to remove another software which comes with prebuilt distro
>complains about zypper doing it's job
>is unable to setup power options
>unintelligible statement

>picks up prebuilt distro, when he actually wants to build it himself
>asks if this is a joke
Yeah, it's april's fool

There are so many to choose from.

This t b h
t. archfags

Attached: 1553805676569.png (920x900, 443K)

If it's not in this pic, it's a good candidate for worst distro

Attached: Ospicker.png (1559x1107, 220K)

Tried installing to a laptop, installer kept giving some error. Tried installing to another one, btrfs rendered the system unresponsive. Repos didn't even have kde-helper for Waterfox.
It's trash.

Seems like this is true. I tried it, it fucking sucks (couldn't get it installed correctly.) So, yeah, utter fucking shit.

I'm about to try that out.

Attached: ArchLinux.jpg (650x4377, 524K)

Arch was never advertised as beginnerfriendly...

Not opensusi for sure

Arch is for retards that cant use gentoo but want to feel like "hax0rs"

anything that is not rhel/centos or ubuntu. 90% of the distros aren't even unique but shitty forks, that use the same packages names, same repositories, same package manager, config location and syntax, etc. look at mint, it's an absolute fucking mess and completely unnecessary, if clement would actually care to just package his shitty DE properly so it wouldn't break all the time. instead he breaks the entire OS stability and security just to make his DE run on a botched version of ubunturd.

What's so bad about OpenSUSE? It used to be very popular in germany some years ago

Why is the the worst? What I like about it: easy setup of btrfs+snapper and encryption, up-to-date packages, zypper is nice and it has the best implementation of KDE out there.

>selects not to install yast
>in opensuse
literally why

This. I installed arch as preperation for gentoo. Yesterday my gentoo seemingly died, so I thought "Hm, I might try arch again, at least it's quicker to install." After one hour of attempted libcpp compilation I had enough

>Bricking a mint install
Wow, I officially heard everything. Also install gentoo

i hate fedora
i love centos for servers tho

Fedora is the best distro unironicaly

Based and fedorapilled

>t. long-time Mint user whose system broke because of some update and now he's on the warpath