BSD license will defeat GPL.
BSD license will defeat GPL
Michael Gomez
Other urls found in this thread:
resources.whitesourcesoftware.com
twitter.com
Gavin Russell
Why?
Ryder Walker
Most likely gpl will gpl some bsd software.
Ryan Baker
>create software with bsd license
>some Jewish company forks it, closes it and makes tons of money with it
>they don't give back anything
>noone uses your garbage anymore because theirs is so much better
vs
>create software with gpl license
>company forks it
>you apply the patches you like
>more companies for it
>you create a sum of those patches
>consumers can choose what version they like best
>gpl spreads
hmmmmm
Hunter Kelly
BaSeD
Connor Foster
Permissive is destroying copyleft, but it's mostly MIT and Apache, not BSD.
Luke Jackson
Blake Nelson
MIT niggers need to die
Gavin Lewis
There is more than one BSD licence and they are both cuck licenses for people who like to be fucked by proprietary software.
Aiden Myers
Ideally all software would be in the public domain.
Mason Cooper
Fucked in what way? BSD license(s) basically just say you cant sue me if my code sucks. Capitalism always wins baby and a good solid foundation is better for the human race as a whole and spawns innovations.
Blake Gonzalez
Year of the GPL desktop
> not yet
Year of the BSD desktop
>2001
Sebastian Hall
Friendly reminder the BSD shill is probably paid to shill BSD on Jow Forums.
BSD sucks, is used by cucks, and anything under BSD/MIT is stole by other people.
Kayden Davis
>BSD license(s) basically just say you cant sue me if my code sucks
No, they say "please take my code and do whatever you want, I am a filthy slut worthy of degradation".
Sebastian Thomas
Levi Powell
"Permissive" software licenses are pushed by corporations to get free labor, whether you like it or not.
The very name "permissive" is misleading and dishonest, as they actually cause more freedom to be taken away in the long run by benefiting proprietary software.
Don't play their game. Release your software under the GPL, or a derivative.
Jaxon Young
Hey, hey. RMS is a Jew. Don't me anti-semitic.
Owen Sullivan
Shilling cuck license for pajeet faggots hired by niggerfaggot corps
William Allen
Jow Forumstard
Jonathan Flores
any day now
Jace Reed
GPLfag projecting his cock lust again
Aaron Young
Disgusting
Isaac Russell
WTFPL > all
Lincoln Butler
m-muh viral license!
Oliver Jones
Came here to post this. BSD and MIT licenses are university tools for graduate students who intend to patent the methods in the code and then sell them to companies. That's why there is no patent grant.
It would be unwise to use these in all but the most trivial cases.
Jace Sullivan
cuck license
Ian Peterson
Fudd vs.
>create software with gpl license
>company forks it
>company keeps almost all the changes internal
>company makes billions
>everything consumers do is being datamined now
>company makes billions more
>consumers get completely fucked over
>umbrella is already taken so you name it alphabet
Nicholas Roberts
GPL defeats itself to be honest.
Logan Cruz
>gpl spreads
The GPL is totally not a virus, guys
Gavin Flores
>gpl
Do phone manufacturers release all the source code for android phones? Why isn't the fsf suing?
Robert Ross
Virus requires external cell for "reproduction", GPL software can be improved or worked on their own.
Ayden Murphy
Gpl only hurts Western tech companies because China use everything freely and don't need to give back
Christopher Scott
The same could be said of proprietary licenses