Did technology came too far?

did technology came too far?

Attached: Capture.png (1361x497, 47K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_epsilon
0.30000000000000004.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

it's practically zero though.

but why isn't?

How do so many people on Jow Forums not understand floating point numbers?

Too many crossboarding /v/ermin.
God I wish /prog/ was a thing still.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754

>floating point numbers
simple fucking 3th grade math
modify the numbers in any way you get 0.
but with these you don't.
and i fucking need this numbers in this fucking formula in my fucking excel

There is a wonderful thing called rounding that might be able to solve your problem. I hope you have enough brain cells to figure out how to do that in Excel.

Rounding has nothing to do with this as if you ad or delete decimals you get a fucking zero.
What about rounding google search¿

It's the machine epsilon
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_epsilon
according to IEEE 754 - 2008
decimal64
You use "thousand" (3 zeroes) so naturally you have 13 zeroes left.

To put simply all you have is 16 digits of precision
It's nothing new that in machine computation.

You must use round to have zero in this case, because it the precision limit.

>2019 online supercomputer calculator
>not accurate decimal number representation for simplest possible math operations
why is this allowed?

You're seriously overrating Google's web calculator. It's just there for retards that need to do basic mathematical operations.

>what is IEEE 754

>make a fancy little UI for math.js
>ONLINE QUANTUM SUPERCOMPUTER TERAFLOPS MEGA CALCULATOR
no

literally change the cell size and condition for float

This is the power of javascript.
>but there's a excuse
Bing gets it right.

Attached: bing.png (526x388, 25K)

>JS bad
Go back to where you cam from, clueless /v/ermin
0.30000000000000004.com/

this is an american website you god damn gypsy, fuck off

seriously user?
that is all about long or short format (a.k.a rounding)
how can 1 be so dum dum

Attached: dumdum.png (1366x768, 68K)

Shut the fuck up, js-pajeet, and take your fucking pile of steaming shit which you call "js" back to the toilet with you

Why did this take almost 5 seconds to do this?

Attached: 1.jpg (650x518, 34K)

could be your machine or internet?

Attached: Clipboard01.png (849x566, 23K)

I guess it's because I used commas instead of dots

I understand floating point, but why doesn't the application have a fallback to say if the input is clearly not trying to get a tiny number, it should just change the return to 0?

Because they can't divine user intent. They could try, but it would be vastly overcomplicated for a little calculator app, and largely inaccurate.

Floating point variables lose precision as a trade off to range.

Just look at that

Attached: 2.jpg (650x541, 34K)