>proprietary software: source code you can't see
>open source software: source code you can see, but don't
Proprietary software: source code you can't see
Jaxon Carter
Other urls found in this thread:
Anthony Edwards
>free software: lmao
Henry Kelly
Nothing to hide nothing to fear
Austin Allen
>implying open source is the opposite of propritary
that is free software tho.
I will only use proprietary if I can see the source, or if others have done it for me.
Nowadays everything has some hidden pay model, instead of a clear one like pay x for software.
Nathan Phillips
>or if others have done it for me.
all source code has been seen by a person somewhere, it didn't write itself
Austin Morgan
If it's open source, it's open domain. Nobody is suing you for using it in your projects.
>others have done it for me
That's my thesis, that's how you become vulnerable and dependent on others by trusting them.
Daniel Gonzalez
your point?
do you conduct your own experiments to conclude that global warming is real?
no, we trust the consensus of the experts
non-free doesnt even allow that
Dylan Robinson
>trusting the consensus of the experts
>thinking a scientist can be an expert
Liam Sanders
There are two types of people who write open source: amateurs and professionals.
I don't trust amateurs who don't have their hide on it and I don't trust professionals who're in cahoots with bad actors.
Asher James
>some butthurt communist who thinks all software should be free is an "expert"