wccftech.com
>The GTX 1650 will be coming in a 4GB flavour and will be 41% faster than a GTX 1050 and 24% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti.
THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA
75W TDP OF PURE PERFORMANCE AND POWER EFFICIENCY GOODNESS
The GTX 1650 will be coming in a 4GB flavour and will be 41% faster than a GTX 1050 and 24% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti
Brody Green
Other urls found in this thread:
techpowerup.com
twitter.com
Ayden Reed
>4GB
It will be 970 all over again. Literally whats the point? If you are poor, stick to intel integrated graphics and save up for better GPU.
Liam Morales
this looks like a poorly done photoshop job
then again it is in ching and chong language
Jaxon Bell
8Gb Vram should be the norm in 2019...goddamn jewish companies man i swear...
Cameron Morales
16? Why not 32GB! We all know every games at 1080p with mid setting use more that 22GB of VRAM!
Blake Davis
Fallout 4 which is several years old uses 7Gb.
Thomas Anderson
>It will be 970 all over again.
So it'll be an extremely popular GPU that the vast majority of people who bought it were happy with? AMDrones truly live in delusion.
Brandon Diaz
Citation
Elijah Moore
Weaker than RX 470/570 and more expensive.
Adam Wilson
Meh. Call me if they come out with a 1680.
Carter Carter
for a 1080p laptop? imo 4niggabytes is enough for that
but still
>gayman on a laptop
Jaxson Rodriguez
At this point they may as well make 7nm mobile that's as powerful as a 1050ti if a 12nm 1650 eats up that much watts.
David Ortiz
Seems good to me. Not everyone is an epic gamer retard, some people just want to sit and play a game after work without spending $3000 on a computer. 1080p is fine.
Colton Morgan
I'm still confused at the retarded numbering scheeme Nvidia chose
10xx->20xx RTX
10xx->16xx GTX
I mean, I get they're making 2 separate SKU portfolios with the raytracing cores and with not, but the numbering they chose for it is retarded. It should have been in line with one another like;
21xx RTX
11xx GTX
Justin Lopez
i also do not understand
i just want a good graphics card that will remain relevant for 3/4 years
ray tracing seems like it might become valuable but i dont fucking know its all smoke and mirrors
Colton Hernandez
IMO raytracing will be a thing but it will take 5-6 years before it really matters (adoption time for users and devs alike), nothing to invest in today when the 2nd or 3rd gen cards are going to be the actual ones that matter. Spending the retarded money for a 20xx RTX card today is just silly.
James Lewis
This. Remember how VR required at least a 970, with a 980 strongly preferable? But it was only until the 10 series VR was really accessible? Same thing with rtx. Rtx, like most technology, is really not so good in the first generation.
Michael Carter
lol, I'm an Nvidia fangirl, and probably the first slut in line to felate Mr. Leather-Jacket Man in exchange for the latest Quadro, but 970 was garbage. Evan the non-Ti 980. Only an idiot would purchase either of these instead of a 780ti.
Ayden Bailey
>It will be 970 all over again
and you're basing this claim on what exactly? is 1650 based on the same architecture as 970? is the magical memory interface thingy going to get nerfed in 1650 like it was in 970?
Noah Rodriguez
The guy is a moron and should be ignored
GTX 1650 like the GTX 1050 Ti has 128bit memory bus, thats why it has 4GB of VRAM, 4 1GB GDDR5 8Gbps memory chips so 4GB of VRAM
techpowerup.com
Dylan Allen
These.
Kayden Lee
hopefully it will get a low profile card as well
Xavier Ross
4gb means 3.5+5... so 8.5 then?