Pick up that can, citizen!

Pick up that can, citizen!

Attached: 1984.jpg (754x302, 62K)

Other urls found in this thread:

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/03/man-jailed-indefinitely-for-refusing-to-decrypt-hard-drives-loses-appeal/
youtu.be/Z3terJAGjww?t=76
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptography
twitter.com/AnonBabble

crypto fags on suicide watch

Pick it up bitch

Attached: Pick up that can citizen.gif (348x372, 3.15M)

what does this have to do with crypto?

because this make all crypto pointless when they can just do this to you.

what

USA, what a shithole.

actually nothing, they can now imprison anybody by claiming they refuse to decrypt their hidden volume which can't be proven to exist.
also fuck brainlet mods IP banning from dynamic IP ranges. Every couple of days i run into this shit, come on.

Attached: file.png (653x255, 29K)

Naja if it's a bit of a consolation, at least this way your government outs itself as a fascistic one, you should hope this gets worse and maybe then one day the general population will realize that innocent until "proven" guilty should be a principle that is upheld.

They found file download hashes and a lewd loli pic that matched CP and a witness (his sister) testified agaisnt him, he never stood a chance.

>"Forensic examination also disclosed that Doe [Rawls] had downloaded thousands of files known by their "hash" values to be child pornography. The files, however, were not on the Mac Pro, but instead had been stored on the encrypted external hard drives. Accordingly, the files themselves could not be accessed.

The court also noted that the authorities "found [on the Mac Book Pro] one image depicting a pubescent girl in a sexually suggestive position and logs that suggested the user had visited groups with titles common in child exploitation." They also said the man's sister had "reported" that her brother showed her hundreds of pictures and videos of child pornography. All of this, according to the appeals court, meant that the lower court lawfully ordered Rawls to unlock the drives."

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/03/man-jailed-indefinitely-for-refusing-to-decrypt-hard-drives-loses-appeal/

ie see obstruction of justice thing