>muh AYYYYMD "fine wine"
>muh 3.5GB
>muh driver gimping
>"Y-Y-You'll regret not buying our housefires in the long run!!!"
And yet the 970 still offers the same performance as a 290 at stock, can overclock much higher and uses half as much power.
Explain yourself, AMDfaggots.
nobody cares about outdated cards.
Op is a faggot. nvidiadrones are fags who can only play on 1080p, i was playing on 1440p on my 290x lmao. you guys stutterted at 1080p ultra.
enjoy being poor you nodick and go back to /LGBT
Literally all I see is AMD street shitters talking about how their cards age better. Don't try and change the narrative Sanjay.
I don't understand why you would even use any of these low-end cards, why would you settle for less? I purposely got a 2080ti so I don't have worry about these types of problems. Stop making bad decisions, it's clear what's good and what isn't. Wake up.
>Pajeet is confused!
>Pajeet used RESOLUTION ATTACK!
>It hurt itself in its confusion!
>garbage ngreedia shitworks games run better on ngreedia shit70
>actual good games run better on AMD
So what's the point you're trying to make?
Fuck bros, not like this....
>generic double digit IQ responses.
Gj proving my points. Good night homos :)
See:
>nobody cares about outdated cards.
Indeed, that's why everybody buys nvidia instead of AMD
>970
>290
How many years have you been simmering about this?
>970 has advantage in Unreal Engine/Gameworks games
I wonder why...
>Gameworks is nVidia proprietary software
>Unreal Engine is nVidia partner
>Unreal Engine has Gameworks and other nVidia specific functions baked in
Ohh.. So that explains it
But Jow Forums told me nvidia kill their old cards
Seething 3.5GB RAMlet
Even with less RAM it gets BTFO, retard
Too bad all the decent games run bettern on the 290 than on the VRAMlet one.
>actual good games run better on AMD
>shitty racing games, multiplayer shooters, AssCreed and failed reboots of 90s franchises
Meanwhile the Nvidia side is full of high quality, high IQ single player experiences like The Witcher 3, Prey, Hitman 2 and Metro Exodus. Really makes you think about what kind of people AYYYYYYMD is targeting with their products.
Imagine being a brand loyalist
Every single one of you should neck yourself
gpu.userbenchmark.com
The r9 wins in raw performance, the 970 wins in game benchmarks.
The Witcher 3 and Prey are within margin of error.
Also
>Prey
>Hitman 2
>Metro slav shite
>High quality, high IQ experiences
Put more effort into your baits.
>OUR CARDS WILL AGE BETTER, YOU'LL SEE
>*5 years later*
>N-NOBODY CARES ABOUT O-OUTDATED CARDS
kek, I have a rx 480 in my system right now, you drones are fucking retards. Seriously.
>Yeah, well... the games that run faster on nvidia are bad!
lemayo, cope harder amdoofus
>the games that run faster on nvidia are bad!
Not all of those games are bad, but certainly fall between mediocre semi-annual AAA assdump and straight up bad.
>games made with ngreedia gimpworks collaboration work better on nobreedia
Wtf, I hate AMD now !
Even if you subjectively find that to be the case right now at this instant, do you seriously think that's always going to be the case over the lifespan of a graphics card?
>games sponsored by amd work better on rayyydeon space heaters
Wtf, I hate Nvidia now !
>hardware unboxed
Of course not, depends of the kind of games released, if they're "sponsored" by Nvidia or AMD, etc. Also depends on the vendor actually giving a fuck about the card, releasing periodic updates for it and supporting the games I care about.
They're constantly called 'amd unboxed' on this board. Now they make a video that is favourable to nvidia. Which company is it that they're shilling for, exactly?
>literally fail to prove that nvidia is somehow better than AMD
Bravo, based nvidiot.
still using a 970 memecard today, paired with a ryzen 2700X
waiting another GPU gen to upgrade.
Nvidiots are brand loyalist manchildren who can't handle any criticism and support nvidia's anti-consumer behavior.
What poojet? Im running 1440p 144hz on 2080ti guess you can still run your 290 rebrandeon at 1440p 15hz
>higher is better
uhhh for which card
I use AYYYYMD because I'm a lunix fag, if I was a super cool gaymer I'd use intel/novideo.
Friendly reminder:
>thermi actual housefire
>wooden screws
>3.5 jewery
>gimpworks (fuck the consumer, but fuck AMD even more)
>garbage dx12 support
>driver gimping
>legacy cards
>ray tracing (2 games) meme
And the list goes on and on. Corporate bootlickers will defend this.
I wasn't arguing that nvidia are better (I have a radeon card), I was pointing out that amd work with game developers too (which often leads to favourable results for their hardware). I also find that the whole gimpworks thing is blown way out of proportion, even when I had a geforce card I would always turn gameworks effects off because they were just too expensive. You're not forced to use them. I see them as optional extras for people who have the overhead, or people in the future replaying the game on newer hardware that can easily manage it.
>I paid extra for gay tracing
>bought the worst price/performance generation of gpu's in recent history
>2 games
Ha hahahahahahaha. The way you were meant to be played, am I right ?
>all these supposed "problems"
>still matches or outperforms AMD "competition"
Nvidia literally don't even have to try. Wow!
>outperforms
Whoa, you get 7-8 more fps on average on nvidia shillworks games. Fucking amazing, wtf I want to sponsor companies that hate consumers now !
>3% slower
>it's somehow faster
I see.
Stock versus stock. AMD cards can't overclock for shit, whereas you can easily get another 20%+ performance out of Maxwell through overclocking.
> generic benchmarks from a shitty youtube channel
>world of tanks
>fortnite
>total shit
>warframe
>justcause 4
Wow so this is what bad teeth poorfags play today
Why you have to be so retarded, just neck it you filthy subhuman.
This is why we have only shitty throwaway games nowadays
>generic benchmarks from a shitty youtube channel
I thought that AMD Unboxed was on the official AYYYYYMD fanboy approved outlet list? Have they been excommunicated from the cult for this transgression?
>Maxwell can't beat a card over a year older
Remember lads, the 290 was a 780 competitor.
7 more fps for 200 more dollars &)
I don't watch american or generica shitty youtube Benchmarks, if you want good source of information go to an actual site with people that know what they are doing and not just unboxing pseudo computer scientists
And even though i prefer amd over nvidia everytime they are equal, your retarded
/v/ermin terms don't apply to me
Also fyi the gtx9xx series didn't compete against the r9 2xx series but rather the r9 3xx and fury series, the 390 amd is about 15% faster than the 290
Average overclock for hawaii is 1150mhz.
The 970 is 3% slower overall. Learn to read graphs. Anyhow it's margin of error territory.
Bro buy that 2080Ti to get the victory royale in Fortnite and World of Tanks.
They corrected it with a reupload, OP is a tard. In the updated video, because they did the math wrong, the 970 is 1% faster than the 290 in the games tested. The were further behind than that 4 years ago, so the AMD memewine is just a couple of % benefit in a few years which could simply be better drivers.
The 970 came out almost a year after the 290, and its main competition was the 390, not the 290 or 290X.
The 290 originally came out one month after the 780Ti, which is what it competed with.
5 years ago 970 was faster now it's 3% slower. So AMD does age better.
Meanwhile the 1080 vs Vega 64...
my 970 runs 1420mhz stable on core and up to 1480mhz but dips down to 1420mhz.
Memory is at 8GBS
It's possible to mod BIOS and increase power limit and voltage a bit too. I got mine running at 1582mhz. Pretty damn good result
Now benchmark it with texture mod, ramlet
Huge cope
Same, ever since I got the 1080ti, I have nothing to worry about. The computer just stays locked at 144 at 1440p.
apex got texture that use 8gb vrm only setting, 3.5 ramlet cant experience this
Neither can a 4GB VRAMlet 290(X) owner, you drooling retard.
i sold my 970 and bought a 2060 at launch but all your faggot vram memes are bullshit it never once had a vram hickup for the 4 years i had it.
This game is for fags but here
I always come to Jow Forums to laugh at amdniggers excuses.
We'll win one day, you'll see!
its literally marketing though
>quick guys what does AMD have that Nvidia doesn't
>more VRAM?
>good be sure to market that at all times
>even though the performance is worse and it runs hotter at the same prices?
>lets just hope the idiots buy it up under the vague "future"-proofing
How can you even say that you don't have to worry about anything? You ONLY have 1080ti, not even 2080ti! Go buy 3080ti yesterday. Or are you a poorfag and can't afford novideo titan RTX TI 4000? Reconsider your life choices, poorfag.
> 1080 also actual housefire
youtube.com
Because high end cards are terrible value.
>mfw undervolted v56
$235
matches 2060/1070ti
$235 buckaroos. Or $35 since I sold my old 980 for $200
>matches 2060
lol
>Or $35 since I sold my old 980 for $200
Wow I sold my AMD Radeon 7 and bought a Nvidia 2060 and literally GAINED money for it! WOWO
The problem per se is not Gameworks, but that it is used on most benchmarks vs AMD
>benchmark software literally built to intel/Nvidia specs
>still shit posting phajeetech
And don't come back
1660Ti currently best performance per dollar, keep coping slum child
>benchmarks literally are games
>AHHHHHHHHHHHH test 7zip you faggots!
Are you stupid? The R9 290 was the GTX 780 competitor. The R9 390 was the GTX 970 competitor.
>best performance per dollar
That's the 570.
Used Vega 56 gets significantly more frames for less money.
$329 970 is 3% slower than 1 year older $300 gpu after 970 release. How the fuck is it not fine wine?
I'm sure it does - the point is hawaii overclocks more than you think once its not on that awful leaf blower and pushing the memory north of 1500mhz gives considerably more bandwidth than the 970 can achieve. A 390 (bear in mind there is no publicaly available reference model) will rival a 980 these days.
It was both, you drone. The Fury flops were priced way higher than the 970, and since AYYYYYYMD clung onto Hawaii for dear life right up until the RX 480 came along (and offered no better performance, but was slightly less of a housefire), it was the product competing in that price range. The 390 was the exact same GPU with double the VRAM, which we've already established is irrelevant, since the 290 already had more VRAM and doesn't benefit from it.
You're literally trying to say that it's Nvidia's fault that AYYYYYYYYYYYYMD can't produce anything new and had to stick their shitty, out of date housefire back in for another round.
>1 year older $300 gpu
LOL now you fags are literally trying to rewrite history. The R9 290 launched at $399.
>muh memory bandwidth
Hawaii was never bandwidth-limited to begin with. And sure as fuck not at 1080p like the testing in the OP is done at (which is all cards of that class can realistically handle in modern games). Swing and a miss, buddy.
uhuh, and how hot and loud does it get?
>green brand good
>red brand bad
>brand i pick is best!! reeeee!!!
Nobody cares, if it plays what you want it to play just be happy. There's not that big of a difference you kike.
Not very.
>The R9 290 launched at $399.
Who the fuck cares about launch? When 970 was released, 290 price was reduced to $300.
>970 at
>1459MHz core clock
>1998Mhz mem clock
>62C max at 1255RPM fan
>290x at
>1215Mhz core clock
>1494Mhz mem clock
>67C max at 5776RPM fan
>not very
youtu.be
>not very
>and how hot and loud does it get?
>not very
AHAHAHAHAH WOW
>discussion about non-reference models
>posts a video of a reference model
You sure are smart user.
No GPU fan goes to nearly 6000rpm - its a bad reading. Pic related.
>417C
Literally an oven for the jews
I've had the temp sensor in unigine valley report my old 290x at hitting over ten thousand degrees celcius.
>buy now and get a free sun
>No GPU fan goes to nearly 6000rpm
Why not? My gpu is not even a leaf blower, dual fan. Pic related.
Imagine defending the 3.5 meme.
>fine wine™ doesn't matter