Shame.... in this clown world firefox is even more sjw than google

So this is a perfectly good reason to """""censor""""" them on your platform. You aren't entitled to free speech, or the expectation of, on someone else's time and money. You can still use the software, you just aren't expedited by Mozilla themselves.

To call this a free speech issue is to demand that Mozilla commit resources to you, which isn't something anyone owes you.

Hello government lea.

We told you often enough no we won't give out our entire browsing history to you for free by switching away from Firefox/Tor.
Your psyops may make retarded teens switch but as long as lea doesn't give me a paycheck I won't switch.

You know where I am so bitch come see me.

found reddit

Is that because, just maybe, it's y'know, likely that, possibly, people are losing their ability to speak elsewhere and there being less outlets to vent?

>So this is a perfectly good reason to """""censor""""" them on your platform

It's not mozilla's platform. It's an add-on that is not installed by default. You have to go out of your way of the normal browser experience to search and install it.

>You can still use the software, you just aren't expedited by Mozilla themselves.
So mozilla should not have banned it then considering it isn't forced and advertised upon installing or using Firefox,

>To call this a free speech issue is to demand that Mozilla
It is when they go out of their way to ban third-party way of using a simple addon which allows text to be communicated via websites.

Why don't you live in north korea? Get fucked commie.

@NPC70504022
this is a VERY semitic post!

I agree with all of your points. However, how can an extension be responsible for its commentators? If I use firefox to call people niggers online would Mozilla take down firefox? I don’t see how the extension broke the TOS. If they come out and say “we can remove whatever we want at any time” that’s fair enough but why have a TOS if they’re going to ignore it?

>still using pozzilla sjwfox

>t. retards
If you want your damn add-on just get it from their (gab's) repositories.
Mozilla doesn't owe you shit to host your files on their servers for free.

Attached: 1554726741516.jpg (466x601, 48K)

>It's not mozilla's platform.
Mozilla's extension library is, in fact, Mozilla's platform. And not yours, because that needs to be pointed out explicitly, you think you have a right to that when you don't. It's not yours in any way.

>So mozilla should not have banned it
Yes they should have, it's Jow Forums shit and doesn't belong on their extension library.

>Why don't you live in north korea? Get fucked commie.
Why don't you? You're a faggot who claims he gets to own someone else's stuff.

It's interesting how you read my post but it clearly didn't process in your head. Mozilla's extension library is Mozilla's. The exact same way someone doesn't get to use your property because "I want to" unless you let them.

>2019
>Not using Brave

I mean..... why not. I hate the current state of society so much that destroying it would be nice. Then again..... maybe we should still look for other solutions.

>Mozilla's extension library is, in fact, Mozilla's platform

Good thing we are not talking about the library being banned but a single extension. Why?

>Yes they should have, it's Jow Forums shit and doesn't belong on their extension library.
No. The extension is neutral. The banning has received no explanation.

>Why don't you?
I respect the voices of all, even those I disagree with. When those same people exhibit opinions or actions acting like totalitarian regimes, maybe they should be better residing in said regimes, instead of being hypocrites, like you.

>Mozilla's extension library is Mozilla's.
Strawman.

Next.

firefox is the browser for normies and official extensions page must reflect that. mozilla don't want a shitstorm to appear that can harm it's product. it's totally understandable.
what did you expect?

it's not that you can't distribute extension on other platforms

yet, they can host the left addons that try to castrate comments for free. You are right, they do not owe me nothing. I do not owe them my usage and I would use brave, chrome, icecat or waterfox over firefox.

An extension that is basically the equivalent of the old Goggles bookmarklet, with a twitter clone serving as infrastructure, is not evil or Jow Forums or fake news or whatever boogeyman lives in your head rent free. You know you could post your own opinions on web pages using it, right?

He's just a commie. They must shut it down anywhere there is free flow of information.

The addon is still awailable for chrome and chrome is the browser used by most millennial and zoomer normies. Firefox has use base strong only among boomers ( even in this category chrome beats it ) and IT specialist that focus on privacy. In other words.... their only userbase is people who are concerned with privacy and would not like them to do such political moves.

those are guys right?

free speech is only guaranteed by the government. get the fuck off our internet.

>Mozilla's platform
it's the community's platform since the community funds mozilla, good thing i never donated to them since they clearly don't want their community to support them anymore
>doesn't belong
your opinion
>claims he gets to own someone else's stuff
how did anyone claim that?
>someone doesn't get to use your property because "I want to" unless you let them
and they dont get to decide how i use my property

>You know you could post your own opinions on web pages using it, right?
not if it was up to mozilla

>>Mozilla's extension library is Mozilla's.
>Strawman.

>Next.
Get the fuck out of here you commie shitstain, why the fuck do you get to dictate that mozilla's infrastructure is for everyone?

>No. The extension is neutral
it has politicized message in the description. why they can't advertise it without politics?

>our internet
No
We can coexist. If you want war so much we can have it, you will win, as you did in the past because most people are idiots like you. And the result will be a crony capitalist state like Russia or a socialist distopia like China. You, the person who wants war, will be one of the first ones to be put in gulag.

And what the fuck are you doing on Jow Forums? you do not want free speech, so go to reddit or twitter.

Attached: 120iq.jpg (604x718, 186K)

>You, the person who wants war, will be one of the first ones to be put in gulag.
i can't wait senpai

>dissenter.com/
it's literally Jow Forums' on a field trip

Attached: 10440090.jpg (236x284, 18K)

Attached: 2fbf9e21075d188be759e905eb6bd0dba2a1078a8169cc994ce132f288d26496.jpg (1024x665, 142K)

Mozilla owns the servers, and has no contract with the community dictating that they must allow all extensions. This is just the free market telling you to get the fuck out.

I use Firefox, should I switch to something like Brave?

Welp time to install Waterfox.

Attached: 1553873064522.gif (500x352, 115K)

>Good thing we are not talking about the library
Yes we are. The entire content, every single entry in it, is part of the library and is Mozilla's platform and their prerogative.

Your stupid wannabe distinction about library vs entry in library makes exactly as much sense as throwing out a technical document that has one single error in it instead of just erasing the single error.

>No. The extension is neutral.
The extension exists for Jow Forums. It's Jow Forums.

>I respect the voices of all
No you don't, Mozilla being a great example of that. You demand other people's property so you can voice your message.

>it's the community's platform since the community funds mozilla
Wrong, it is Mozilla's. Once you have given money to them, you have given that money up. If you disagree with Mozilla's actions (any action, doesn't have to be a moral action like the one exhibited in OP) then your recourse is to no longer give them cash. You own nothing.

>your opinion
No shit Sherlock, who's else opinion would it be? This means nothing, because the opinion that decides Mozilla's library is Mozilla. My walls are painted white, want to point out something else irrelevant?

>and they dont get to decide how i use my property
They haven't, nor have they tried to. You're the one demanding someone's property be used your way.

It probably was flagged on mozilla addons. And for a reason.

>Mozilla owns the servers
So?

>and has no contract with the community dictating that they must allow all extensions.
So why discriminate?

>This is just the free market telling you to get the fuck out.
Free market being the monopoly of commies running a browser company that take donations from other left-leaning tech companies that vote for left leaning policies that eventually end up in erosion of free speech? That free market?

mozilla is flagged in my brain. And for a reason.

>Yes we are
No we're not.

>The extension exists for Jow Forums.
Not it does not.

>No you don't
Yes I do.

It's funny when Jow Forums loses an argument and resorts to memes. It happens so fast the meme is usually their first reply.

>It's funny when Jow Forums loses an argument and resorts to memes.
> It happens so fast the meme is usually their first reply.
So which is it? Engaged and lost the argument or first reply is a meme?

Man you could have just said NO U if you're going to post so childishly.

>getting triggered by memes

Attached: shootergames.png (509x262, 192K)

NO U

>l-look we can deplatform like google too, w-we're still relevant right?

wtf did clowns ever do to you?

Easy way to spot the hypocrites:

If the right held the sway and a right-leaning company banned an addon for limp-wristed communists, the communists would be upset also because it was removing some way to communicate with other communists.

Could you lefties not see that Internet censorship fucks you as well? It is not a war between right and left, but between corporate censorship and freedom. Do you really think that the corporate overlords would not have any problems with you spouting your leftist views about workers rights, forced diversity and anarchism in the future? I can guarantee you that in a couple of years time you will start losing your platforms as well.

And yea, I get it - Orange man bad - yes he is! Maybe if you brought an actual candidate you could win 2016.

Fuck...I've been using Firefox since 2006. I've stuck by them all this time despite the shit they've pulled. But this is where I get off the ride.

You can also spot the hypocrites because they made arguments where give false equivalencies such as "anyone who isn't a right winger like myself is a communist".

>still using sjwfox in 2019
Le shig

they are useful idiots, but with good intentions. For as long as they do not hold so much power and the people above them do not make them to be authoritarian, the left can be fine.

The tolerant left strikes again

Glad you noticed that a hypothetical example reflecting the dichotomy of the current political climate, poindexter.

No, you committed a logical fallacy and haven't actually addressed the issue (you don't own someone else's property and you're demanding its use) at the same time, plus the fallacy was easy to point out as Jow Forums's usually are.

>Allows unsigned addons
>No telemetry and data collection sent back to Mozilla
>No stupid sponsored links on the new tab page
>No pocket bullshit
It's time to make the switch.

Attached: Waterfox_New_Logo_2019.png (351x283, 70K)

lol what a fucking faggot, as if Trump isn't just a meme. pretty much chaotic neutral in comparison to every other POTUS man.

Attached: IMG-20190410-WA0005.jpg (750x421, 59K)

>No, you committed a logical fallacy
No I didn't. I explained why.

>you don't own someone else's property and you're demanding its use
No I don't

>plus the fallacy was easy to point out as Jow Forums's usually are.
I don't visit pol at all.

Are you biased because you lean communist, by chance?

>make up hypothetical
>SEE ALL HYPOCRITES LOOK
ok
gab it's self doesn't ban commies, they're pro-free speech
dunno what the heck you're talking about
if they had an addon store they wouldn't ban a commie addon

all I am saying is that Trump is not perfect, but I like him more than Hilldog.

Attached: 1554844396293.jpg (767x1199, 103K)

He's not talking about GAB you mong, he's talking about if the current political climate and tech industry were right leaning instead of left.

That's dumb, but OK.
In the current political climate nearly all of the right-wing is pro-free speech and is complaining about censorship.
So they would not censor.
There.

You've explained nothing, not one argument as to why you own someone else's property. In fact only one post in this thread has even made an attempt, the "non-profit corporations are owned by their contributors" post that is clearly untrue, you don't own a thing and gained nothing when you gave them money.

It needs to be very pointedly said over and over that none of you are respecting ownership while at the same time screaming something about communists or whatnot. The fact that you cannot understand why this is plainly incorrect is very telling.

This is why universal healthcare and basic income should never be allowed

>You've explained nothing, not one argument as to why you own someone else's property

I never claimed this, you claim I do. Therefore, strawman.

> The fact that you cannot understand why this is plainly incorrect is very telling.
Nothing you have said implicitly argues against my points because you haven't got a leg to stand on, hence the strawmanning.

i have another reason

Attached: 1528166565427.jpg (650x718, 215K)

You know your argument would have weight if google and the rest of silicon valley don't try and pull the "both sides" argument.
We know you all censor right wing speech. You wont admit to it and use pilpul words to get out of explaining why you are such hypocrites.
You wonder why your side is losing? People are starting to see why.

Tesla sacrificed his life and died a virgin for this

I don't see anyone saying this is illegal or that mozilla owes them anything. You're still free to disagree with something even if you think that's not owed to you. I don't think you should post here, but I don't think you should be arrested for it.

>I never claimed this, you claim I do. Therefore, strawman.

Yes you did, you complained that Mozilla's prerogative didn't align with yours concerning their extension library, meaning you want to make decisions concerning their property.

>Nothing you have said implicitly argues against my points

You've been on Jow Forums too long, the word you're looking for is explicitly, I think you may have been going for
>implying

I am not strawman, I am pointing out the facts of your position.

>You know your argument would have weight if google and the rest of silicon valley don't try and pull the "both sides" argument.
I agree completely, and you can clearly see that in my posts. There shouldn't be PC words and nonstatements made about this by corporations.

To the guy up above, the rest of this guy's post is what a strawman is. Neither of you have any idea what my political, social, whatever position is. You literally cannot get around the part where I'm sticking my flag in the dirt over "you don't own those servers" and you make random shit up past that point.

>The extension exists for Jow Forums. It's Jow Forums.
Prove this claim. It's the only way you get even close to a breach of the ToS. Otherwise it's just
>they're free to host whatever they want
Yeah, and I'm free to disagree with the decisions they take on what not to host.

At least gab had the good sense to distribute their extensions on their own website in case something like this would happen.

Attached: 1554831229634.jpg (1024x1024, 138K)

>Yes you did
No I didn't. Your bias is clouding your judgement. You're assuming something from nothing.

>You've been on Jow Forums too long, the word you're looking for is explicitly, I think you may have been going for
>implying
Are you being unironic?

Mozilla can stop you from easily using an add on? Why is an open source project designed that way?

>Neither of you have any idea what my political, social, whatever position is

we already know what your position is you piece of shit. if you support the restriction of people communicating, for any reason, you're a worthless dog.

>Neither of you have any idea what my political, social, whatever position is.
pretty sure you're an NPC

Honestly, why do we need 2 politics boards?
Hiro should delete either Jow Forums or Jow Forums because there's literally no difference by now.

It's posts from people who browse Jow Forums.

>No I didn't.
Yes you did, I don't have bias about your position, you've made it very clear. Your posts implicitly demand control over something you don't own by claiming a fuzzy right like freedom of speech, which isn't applicable in this situation. Simply saying "this should be this way" when the state of "this" is not your say is more than an opinion.