Finally, my kind of video card

Stop this weird false flag. Low profile cards are super comfy.
Back when monitors weren't on height adjustable stands, and desks were deeper, the desktop computer were nice monitor stands, and left all the necessary ports directly in front of you.
I miss having my ports right in front of my keyboard instead of way to one side due to case dimensions.
Granted, it was incredibly shit for airflow having your monitor on top of possible ventilation areas, but most cases I saw that did this had front/rear fans and no vent holes on the top or bottom.

>It's a faster graphics card, but it doesn't have muh arbitrary vram number that I want and it doesn't include any shitty AAA games that I could just pirate so its worse, even though its better
This is your brain on ayymd

Attached: 1528714887769.jpg (900x900, 58K)

says the poorfag

>Stop this weird false flag
But I'm not falseflagging. I legit look forward to that one.

Attached: 1533186807036.png (787x77, 4K)

>can't understand any situation other than enthusiast full height 300mm cards in a full ATX case
First time having a computer or what?
>I'm not falseflagging
>yeah perfect for brainlet incels
>yep, looks like a card for me
>replying to such an obvious flame post in agreement
A likely story.

>needs pcie power
>GCN trash
>shit HW video decode/encode
no thank you

Literally none of those are valid arguments.
The only concern for PCIe power is if you're poor and running in a Dell Optiplex or some other shitty meme. I'm not poor, so I have a good power supply and cooling system.

If anyone bought the 590 they should feel ashamed

>old ass powerhungry architecture and shit HW video decode aren't valid arguments for low end GPU
take that amd cock outm of your ass

>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS WITH NO VP9 HARDWARE DECODING, VIOLATING PCIe POWER STANDARDS AND NO DRIVERS DETECTED

>old
Irrelevant.
>powerhungry
If this is a concern to you, you should go back to a console or something. Imagine drawing ~300W total systme power draw. Oh no, what a shame.
>shit HW video decode
Not a valid argument.
>VP9 hardware decode
Again, not a valid argument. Not a necessity in day to day usage.
>violating PCIe power standards
Not a valid argument.
>no drivers
Old meme.

>sir pls buy my amd garbage

>6GB in 2019, on a card that trade blows with 1070, that runs on 8GB GDDR5
> it doesn't include any shitty AAA games that I could just pirate

Imagine forking out more to get RAM shafted and refusing to pay for games yourself when you already shelled a lot for not a lot better performing card.

I don't care what you buy, user. If you want to buy a fucking Matrox, go for it. Just stop regurgitating shitty memes.

Every point is relevant when I can make a passive cooled build with 1650 and respectable performance.
>vp9
what is YT
Shit show, rajeesh. No rupees for you.

>what is YT
>runs fine with a GTX 980 & RX 590
>runs fine even without hardware acceleration
Also, passive cooling is a joke.

>A likely story.
you dont know that nvidiot retardation is capable of

>moving the goal posts
>post about cards in completely different market tier
fucking lol

>using the reference point I have in the RX 590 & GTX 980
>moving goal post
Sure thing, user.
Funny how you don't comment on the fact that I also mention that YouTube runs just fine without hardware acceleration. I mention both higher and lower references.

And also has the same amount of vram as the RTX 2060, your point?

All of my mehs.
No FOSS drivers for 3-5 years, no real interest.

For the moment that means buying AMD, but Intel is FOSS too and they have desktop GPUs coming soon. Fuck proprietary botnet nVidia shit.

Actually it looks like they finally fixed the power violation problems with RadeonVII - shunts on all power sources for once.
Only took them like 10 years.

Anything below 1660 Ti is not worth buying.

you're a mongoloid

Anything below 2080 Ti is not worth buying.

Anything below TITAN RTX is not worth buying.

Attached: NVIDIA-GTX-1660-Ti-FF-XV-result.png (974x745, 18K)

/thread