Linux=communism

okay and what's wrong with that

Uh oh

Linux is anarchy, not communism, although you could argue anarcho-communism. Either way, it's left-wing shit.

>use GPL software voluntarily and thereby agreeing to the terms and conditions set by the original developers
>forced

I never really went into it but it always felt like that. Also why do linux users have an urge to let you know they use linux?

Wow, first time communism produced a product better than capitalism.

>going to Jow Forums
>seeking out Linux threads
>make rants about how "leftist" open source is
>make claims about how Linux users are
>get surprised actual linux users respond
Why are winfags like this?

>implying communists didn't go into space before the seething mutts

How was i surprised that linux users respond? Thats exactly what i wanted, why would i ask non linux users about anything linux related?

And not surprisingly, the seething mutts had to literally import purebreed whites in order to go to space too.

And then immediately went bankrupt, whole country ate shit and lived like rats. Pretty good

>communism fell in the 90s
>immediately

Because living like shit for ~40 years is a good argument

Friendly reminder that literally millions of Americans are currently living in conditions as bad as ruskies under Stalin. This is what you get for allowing jews to manipulate your economy in either direction.

This is true, but people still live better than then.
Millions seem a bit too much desu

>Friendly reminder that literally millions of Americans are currently living in conditions as bad as ruskies under Stalin
Either this is b8 or you’re the absolute biggest retard to walk the planet.

Why are all commies paranoid?

Anime = paedophilia

Stalin was and still is massively popular precisely because he elevated Russian's standard of living.

>Millions seem a bit too much desu
Granted, not ALL live as bad.

Not an argument.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-04-11_09-39-56.png (630x250, 45K)

yeah they went from medieval peasants to medieval peasants with tractors

fpbp

Attached: 1554957213559.jpg (177x284, 8K)

This. Sure, he sent thousands to the gulags. But for the average rusky, he brought jobs and prosperity. Communism didn't suck until the end, where international embargos, sanctions and US-lead meddling caused the Soviet to suffer massively, which ultimately lead to instability and economic collapse.

Literally better off than half of Africa with that alone.

no, communism being a failure of a system and them spending everything on the military led to economic collapse you fucking commie

>american education

It was in the first version. There was that clause that forbid you to sell it. Luckily linus decided later to remove the license and switched to the GPL, making it effectively non-communist.

Attached: 1554837026538.jpg (720x960, 61K)

Based and redpilled

Attached: jqbNs6j.jpg (1920x1080, 334K)

>forced to share
"From each according to his ability" means nothing to this guy apparently. Communism is a gift economy.

Linux is nonfree software, brainlet. Only a part is GPL'd, the rest is drivers and firmware blobs, lots of them proprietary.

>freedom = free software

Punctuation you dolt

Perfect.

>all these 1st world socialists
*helicopter turbines spin up*

Attached: helicopter.png (680x345, 375K)

>why would i ask non linux users about anything linux related?
Current state of wintoddlers.

There's no scarcity in software. you cannot buy it, you can only license it. You cannot steal it, you can only infringe on intellectual property. Computers are fundamentally copying machines and the act of using a piece of software is copying.

Most of economics/capitalism does not apply to software, only labor cost of software development.

Based GNU

>you can only infringe on intellectual property
Actually no, since such a thing doesn't exist. There are only some laws like copyright, patents, etc which companies lump together and call it 'intellectual property' - to fool and brainwash citizens, so that they parrot that word and believe it's a real thing and ihat it should be protected.

>which companies lump together and call it 'intellectual property'
exactly as I intended it

Go home, Jow Forums, you're drunk.

>Tinfoil hats
>paranoia
>communism