ARCH LINUX & MANJARO

ARCH LINUX & MANJARO

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 20K)

Arch

...what about them?

Shit vs Shit for autists.

Install Parabola

Fedora IBM/systemd.

aren't they the same system ones just not as autistic as the other?

For me, it's Windows 7

arch beta tests for manjaro

I wish that there was fixed-release Arch version. I know that there's Hyperbola, but it's libre-only.

void

Xfce on arch is pretty shit right now. Can't even create a document with right click.

I was surprised how Manjaro just werks.

Both are shit. Install Windows

void vs parabola ?

Parabola is FSF endorsed.

Void doesn't have 64-bit wine.

It's a GTK "feature"

arch

manjaro sucks

Install GNU +Solus

I have no problem

It doesn't though.

Arch = Antergos > Manjaro

I am on arch
I actually installed manjaro i3 to copy them
manjaro really does excellent job at making distro feel like it has it own vibe and is comfy and nice
unlike shit like antergos which feels like installer for arch
also the fact manjaro uses us arch users as beta tester makes me smile

I recommend it every time someone asks somewhere what distro to choose

I think it is obvious that rolling releases with very new packages will become more and more popular, especially if they have AUR
I can not even imagine going to ubuntu let alone debian on my desktop
fucking ppa noise and issues on version jumps

Attached: manjaro-brasil-exibir-t-pico-bonitos-para-o-nosso-1458116.png (1920x1080, 1.39M)

It does though

im afraid to jump the ship from debian. And if i change i dont know if i should go to fedora or manjaro.

get a new 120GB ssd for $20 and try on that one...
extra ssd is always nice