How do we fix the web?

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: me_041.jpg (250x250, 6K)

It's terminal.
Can't be saved.

Stop being so obsessed with sex. It comes off pretty needy.

wiby.me

You have to go back.

Attached: 1543848218215.gif (680x510, 127K)

only incels care about this shit lmao

>wojack
You are the one who has to go back

How much storage was actually used on relevant information

Is Anthony the most based LMG member?

Wow, what a insightful comment! You could have summed it up with a simple word and a single letter "no u"

Attached: a46.jpg (600x597, 22K)

>can't spell fucking wojak
no u

Of course

scare the normies out or find a new secret club, no other way

You sound pretty upset and generally like a miserable person. I hope you get better soon user. Life can be good.

> literal bot writes responses like "incel" or "have sex" to all threads on Jow Forums with this pic, regardless of the OP post

U mad bro?

Attached: clownworld1.gif (500x500, 1.18M)

she is the brains behind the paper, she designed the algorithm. Her legion of code-monkey boys did the boring work of writing it up for her. Most of Chael's "code" is just data commited to the repo like any idiot code-monkey would do.

Attached: 1555026554739.png (1007x526, 107K)

>people who get off pretending to be enslaved are mentally troubled enough to volunteer willingly and legally to become so

I'm not even surprised.

Nah, you just identify with him.

The only thing legendary here is the shnoz on that prime jewess ready for my bbc.
*SNNNIIIIIIFFFFFFFFFFFFF*

lagunitas is good

i think this is a larp, that or this bitch is braindead

> A debt contract is an agreement in which you agree to repay funds to a lender.

so by that logic, she loaned him 100k lol? there's no way to make a legal contract that says "i owe you 100k just because", commercial contracts require promise of some sort of exchange, value or assets or goods, you can't just make someone promise to be indebted to you

tl;dr this is bullshit

Ban JS and holocaust "jAvAsCrIpT dEvElOpErS".

what is services rendered

maybe you should stop paying prostitutes because they didn't give you any assets or goods to take home

I think you'd be hard fought in court to uphold that sort of arrangement. Homeboy might've paid a lawyer to type it up, for his roleplay, but if he wanted to rescind his offer she wouldn't have any real recourse, in fact it'd likely wind up costing her money for the court costs.

Chances are if the lawyer was worth the money the court would see the contract as legally binding because it was made by two consenting partners fully aware of what they are doing.

but that wouldn't be called a "debt" contract, it would just be a contract for services rendered... retard, and counts as income.
a debt contract is a financial instrument used specifically for LOANS.
if you write up a contract for services rendered you are liable if you do not deliver said services, meaning that if it's a 3 year contract she's the one who is technically in debt as she has a 3 year long 100k liability if the "client" disputes the quality of service
there's no way any lawyer would write up a debt contract for something like this

also see: thedrsuereview.com/what-is-a-financial-domination-debt-contract/

you're a dumb faggot

wrong, legal contracts aren't playthings where you can make up arbitrary clauses and enforce them by law, the courts don't give a fuck about your fetish bullshit, you can be fined for bringing bullshit like this to court in the first place

it's more likely that if she did even try she'd get raped by the IRS after declaring the funds because i'm sure these dumb whores don't register this as self-employment income

Attached: jewnar lander crash.jpg (749x750, 98K)

here's the legal basis for why these contracts are unenforceable anyway: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consideration_in_English_law
it's the most basic concept in commercial contract law, relevant bit:
> Consideration can be anything of value (such as an goods, money, services, or promises of any of these), which each party gives as a quid pro quo to support their side of the bargain. Mutual promises constitute consideration for each other. If only one party offers consideration, the agreement is a "bare promise" and is unenforceable.
bare promises are not considered contracts and therefore cannot be enforced in a court of law, whether in a jury or in binding arbitration
no lawyer *can* even write a contract that amounts to a "bare promise" because it is not considered lawful and they can lose their license to practice if they sell a service like this to their clients, so you can't even get a lawyer to write this for you, much less get a court to enforce it

Based

cringe

Thanks user

Tuns out, she did a sub sub sub part of a programm. A sort of 'adaptor' that just reformats certain data into another format, and then feeds it into the ACTUAL programm.

That misrepresentation of what she actually contributed and what she actually did is nauseing. Either nepotism on the part of the institution OR the media.

Sources :

here, what SHE wrote ( HOPSTOOLS ) : github.com/klbouman/hopstools

Here the mother program, where that optional part of her is added, where it acts as a sort of interface to import one more datatype by reformatting it.

source : github.com/sao-eht/eat/graphs/contributors

It's kinda ridiculous, how the media morphs this into something COMPLETEY different.

btw: that's also NOT an algo, but just reformatting data.

────────

You dont understand - she did NOT write and algo at all. sche did NOT write an image tool at all.

What she did code is at max about 4 pages of code - but more importantly - is neither an algo, nor a imaging program but is an ADAPTOR for a source of data, which reformats the data to feed it into the mother program - of which she contributed that adaptor, which makes up ca 0.01% of said mother program at max AND is marked as "optional" part of the program

sources : github.com/sao-eht/eat/graphs/contributors

Her whole bundle ("hopstools") here was merged into the mother programm and counted as one commit of 'mother' program. hopstools, of which she did at max 25% Her share on contribution on this actual imaging program is about 0.3% max, but OK lets say 1% - So she did less than 1/4 of 1% of the work. max. If we're very generous.

this little part is the share that her contribution does. And again : HOPSTOOLS is just an adaptor for another dataformat that can be read into the 'mother' programm. that's it.

Andrew Chael wrote 850k out of the 900k lines of code He was also the leader of the project Michael D. Johnson wrote 12k lines of code Chanchikwan wrote 5k lines of code

The woman? Only wrote 2.4k lines of code

Interestingly enough, the code she wrote was importing something called HOPStools

Interestingly enough if we go look at HOPStools and all its contributors we get:

weilgusm wrote 2.9k lines of code

chanchikwan wrote 676 lines of code

Andrew Chael wrote 1.2k lines of code

jpbarrett wrote 71 lines of code

Katie Bouman wrote 2 lines of code

Hell, even on the hopstools thing there is this in the summary:

"=============================

For Katie:

cd /Users/klbouman/Research/vlbi_imaging/software/hops/build source hops.bash

run this file from: /Users/klbouman/Research/vlbi_imaging/software/hops/eat"

She also fixed absolutely none of the bugs on the EHT

And the algorithm they talk about? It was plagiarized off of a japanese guy named Mareki Honma who made the thing back in 2012, and uploaded/updated it to github in 2016

Andrew Chael asked to use it, Honma helped him adapt it, and was part of 60 japanese people working on the project

Katie Bouman, also isn't following any one at all on Github and has basically only utilized it for these two projects (Hopstools and EHT)

The second co-leader of the EHT imaging group is Kazunori Akiyama with the first being, Andrew Chael.

bhi.fas.harvard.edu/people/kazunori-akiyama

news.mit.edu/2019/mit-haystack-first-image-black-hole-0410

Looks like MIT's social media twitter account didn't collaborate with MIT's own news office since in reality, Katie Bouman did not lead any team at all or was a leader at all.

The actual leaders were Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael.

Notice how before this social media shilling on twitter, the MIT article only mentioned Katie Bouman once at the very end of the article.

news.mit.edu/2019/mit-haystack-first-image-black-hole-0410

The Haystack EHT team includes John Barrett, Roger Cappallo, Joseph Crowley, Mark Derome, Kevin Dudevoir, Michael Hecht, Lynn Matthews, Kotaro Moriyama, Michael Poirier, Alan Rogers, Chester Ruszczyk, Jason SooHoo, Don Sousa, Michael Titus, and Alan Whitney. Additional contributors were MIT alumni Daniel Palumbo, Katie Bouman, Lindy Blackburn, Sera Markoff, and Bill Freeman, a professor in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

How long before this MIT article written by MIT themselves gets taken down and rewritten to give Katie Bouman a whole paragraph to herself?

When will the mainstream media take responsibility for inaccurate reporting? Why is there such a glaring difference between one of MIT's twitter accounts versus their own press release?

Why were the 2 leaders: Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael completely ignored by everybody else?

4 teams around the world.

American team was ked by Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael.

Nowhere it is mentioned that Katie Bouman led the American team, just only these 2 males who were co leaders.

Where did this Katie Bouman was leader originate from? Even MIT's own news article doesn't mention this.

news.mit.edu/2019/mit-haystack-first-image-black-hole-0410

Katie Bouman did not invent the algorithm.

Multiple people are cited on the limited proof of concept thesis.

The actual research and development of practical application of this technology, as well as development of the algorithm itself, was done by a huge team of researchers, not Katie Bouman:

arxiv.org/abs/1901.06226

arxiv.org/pdf/1901.06226.pdf

iopscience.iop.org/journal/2041-8205

This is the primary research that led to the possibility of imaging the black hole. Notice how the research cites Andrew Chael’s EHT imaging library (the guy who wrote 850,000 lines of code). Chael wrote the entire library. To not give him the same or preferably more credit than Bouman is pretty messed up.

bhi.fas.harvard.edu/people/andrew-chael

Also, Katie Boumsn did not lead or manage anything. These are the directors, managers, and affiliates:

bhi.fas.harvard.edu/our-people

Katie Bouman does not deserve 100%, 50%, 25%, 10%, 5%, or even 1% of the credit. There are so many people involved that made far more significant contributions (like Andrew Chael developing the EHT imaging library).

What has science come to when such incredible falsehoods about who contributed to research are perpetuated by the scientific community and mainstream media? It’s wrong.

>needing that much fucking space to print "hello world"
jesus fucking christ talk about inefficient. Women truly are a cancer on us all

thanks for posting this

I think the main takeaway i can get is not to give a fuck about normie opinions. If you're on the team you should be interested in the actual research not winning some popularity contest or being part of some journalists narrative. Let normies say whatever they want.

Yikes!

>>but that wouldn't be called a "debt" contract,
It would be called a debt contract if they both wanted to call it that.

Sorry but that's debunked now.

Face it you guys got scammed by the pretty white girl trick once again. At this point I wonder why do sites like r*ddit even exist when they have been wrong so many times

Attached: 1555039139697.jpg (494x1024, 100K)

who cares faggot, how many other times has nasa or some other faggot organization/company given praise to a director/face of a project instead of the programmers? literally every single time, the only reason everyone is reeing at it this time is because the "face" this time is an attractive white girl
fucking incels

@NPC70519310
>white girl
OY VEY

>t. brainlet

Way to move the goalposts fallacyfaggot.

you're not even using logical fallacies right you stupid nigger

Moving the goalposts
Moving the goalposts is a metaphor, derived from goal-based sports, that means to change the criterion of a process or competition while it is still in progress, in such a way that the new goal offers one side an intentional advantage or disadvantage.

>i'm a dumb nigger: the post

Attached: 25ec44d5ecbc9c51026ea3b2b88e8ba1e6c5c4b7f0099ff0ae6192a2a727b60a_1.jpg (320x126, 9K)

Not an argument.

get a life faggot

>attractive white girl
She's a 6. People are upset because they decided to give a grad student all the credit

...

does this make gdp go up 100k

she's like an 8/10 in the set of women who can actually program

What's that thing above John Oliver, a fucking pillow? Most of this is tied together but are the true alphas supposed to sleep with their heads on a mattress? Or am I just seeing it weird I can't tell

>attractive
>that nose
>white
>(((Bouman)))

Attached: 12146366-6910721-image-a-15_1554991054572.jpg (962x800, 80K)

Those kikes are experts at taking credit for others' achievements. 130 IQ on average my ass.

The "pussy hat"

During the woman's march, everyone was wearing one.

I don't know reddit thought that wearing a vagina on your head was an astute rebuttal.
I don't think they do either.

go back to

why do men obsess so hard over women?

Attached: 1546769501647.jpg (2048x1713, 328K)

based

Attached: DB055ADF-7B39-4F86-9DB5-A64FA5ACF7AF.jpg (600x900, 90K)

Have sex, incel

>ShemaleYum

Attached: 1554681773694.jpg (640x646, 45K)

New York Times just debunked you.

Her algorithm was not used in the end.

Attached: 1555055572980.png (1110x584, 60K)

this user gets it

Are you retarded? Court implies he sues her. It implies he would bring a case against her. It implies he would testify against her. What part of SUBMISSIVE in the dominant/submissive fetish are you not understanding?

But every media is repporting that she lead this particular team or was a lead developer. None of your sources dispute this or state who the lead was.

We fix history

Attached: 1955-02-24 2007-01-01.jpg (1200x800, 54K)