The eternal rivalry. Which one do you prefer Jow Forums?

The stability of Debian with AUR ...

Sweet utopia ...

/thread

Debian. You fucking retarded or something?
This.

An actual functional desktop OS, Windows.

Attached: linux.png (841x724, 520K)

Based

If installing and using Linux is 'needlessly complex' then you're a tard, congrats. I bet you use Windows with a touchscreen.

Attached: costanza.jpg.jpg (487x469, 63K)

Attached: linuxwillalwaysfail.png (1813x103, 30K)

AUR is a piece of crap where everyone uploads their shitty github repositories. why would anyone use this?

this.
if you wanna know why people love ricing so much check this
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IKEA_effect
or if you are to lazy to read watch this
youtube.com/watch?v=dwBH409PhL4
people love their wobbly riced computers

no true Scotsman fallacy

Yep, perpetuated by Linux snowflakes who like to complicate their lives by using Linux as a desktop OS.

Idk why people praise AUR so much when you have the ability to compile from source- one of GNU/Linux greatest features - then you can have any up to date software.

Manjaro.

debian testing

kek

because when you install from AUR it's an actual package managed by an actual package manager which will keep its deps satisfied and allow for easy uninstall or upgrade.

MacOS

Void

Xubuntu

Arch on the desktop, Debian on the server.

Gentoo.

Hell naw. Wayland is the future, Xorg it's obsolete EOL software, that nobody wants to touch because it just works and would be a pain in the ass to modernize it without breaking the backwards compatibility. Did I mention that Wayland doesn't have screen tearing?

>go to void homepage
>look at clean aesthetic and logo
>mouse over logo
>fucking spins around

Fedora.

Imagine thinking like this. Debian is arguably a piece of trash but it still somewhat works and actually sees some use, while Arch is a straight up hacked-together bunch of files that dares to call itself a distro.
It's called Gentoo+Overlays or Fedora+RPMFusion
This.

This.

Fedora/RHEL

Clearly, a winner

>Debian is arguably a piece of trash
I would like to hear those arguments.

>Arch is a straight up hacked-together bunch of files that dares to call itself a distro
Thats just stupid. Don't be a moron.

Manjaro

THIS

For ease of use, power, and control I choose Freedos.

Attached: FreeDOS _ The FreeDOS Project.png (600x600, 37K)

>The eternal rivalry
Of what, which one has more security holes?

void does a better job at this

>systemd-sysv-hackjob
>/etc/network
>stable doesn't get bugfixes other than security
>dpkg is a glorified gunzip
>apt still needs manual repo updates
>services get autostarted at installation before proper configuration can take place
>sources.list is an utter mess if you want to do external repos
Meanwhile in ricerland
>package maintainers run their version bumps on a cronjob, who cares if a package ships broken the first time around?
>pacman format is not nearly as powerful as NEVRA+PRCO
>no partial upgrades supported
>no downgrades supported
>no older versions of software supported
>basically have to follow the roll closely or have an unupgradable system
>package splitting is basically nonexistent, contradicting the bloat-free thing fags like to claim

>oldest
>most respected
Nice meaningless marketing buzzwords
>rock stable
Agree, you won't ever have breaking upgrades if you never upgrade

>It's called Gentoo+Overlays or Fedora+RPMFusion
It‘s called Debian with backports, autismal nigger.

Arch is irrelevant as fuck.

>honest to god rpmnigger
>can‘t handle sourcelist or aliasing apt
>thinks /etc/network is bad
You are literally just a hipstery archtoddler. Stop posting until you‘ve run a couple servers instead of distrohopping on your chinkpad.

>backports
>newer versions of already available software = more software
Imagine being this retarded.

Whomst are you quoting, autistic child?

>/etc/network is bad
Yes it fucking is. The only network script system that's at least acceptable is netifrc, and even that sucks for anything significantly more than "you have exactly one static IPv4 address and nothing about your network topology will ever change". For anything serious you better use NetworkManager or systemd-networkd.
>tl;dr claim arch is shit
>hipstery archtoddler
Ok retard.
>until you‘ve run a couple servers
I run multiple servers. My main one is running Gentoo and aside from running a few generic services on its own acts as a host for a shitload of VMs for various tasks, usually with Fedora Server, Atomic or Cloud edition as well as CentOS.
My other physical servers run Fedora Server.
>distrohopping on your chinkpad
I primarily use an XPS 13, which I moved over to Fedora about a month ago after over a year of using the same Gentoo install. Not sure if that would qualify as distrohopping

Fedora, I just get that Red Hat...sorry IBM approved tech directly without pretending Linux is about choice.

>who are you quoting poster
>dares to call others autistic
kek

>gets called out on retarded strawman
>n-no y-you k-kek

Attached: C9B1397A-5258-4B66-8231-0FE87282F3D6.jpg (609x750, 75K)

Arch. I would literally not hire a Debian user. Ever notice how all these people who say Debian is great happen to be neets on Jow Forums? Ever notice how all of Debian's maintainers are transcels? Ever notice how actual workplaces use Ubuntu over Debian? I have never been able to get a stable working installation of Debian, yet Arch, Gentoo, Ubuntu seem just fine? The reality is that these people use Debian claiming it's stable, but actually just spend all day manually updating software to newer versions to feel more productive.

>provide argument that is wrong
>explain why you are wrong
>"""""who are you quoting?"""""""
>gets called out on acting like a sperg
>s-strawman!

One is for changing terminal color and screenshot posting.
One is for real productive works.
Which one is better for who exactly?

>For anything serious you better use NetworkManager or systemd-networkd.
Lmfao. You‘ve clearly never done any networking besides connecting to McDonalds wifi.
>use nm for „anything serious“
Absolutely mental. Literally rolling on the floor.
>I run multiple servers. My main one is running Gentoo and aside from running a few generic services on its own acts as a host for a shitload of VMs for various tasks, usually with Fedora Server, Atomic or Cloud edition as well as CentOS.
My other physical servers run Fedora Server.
Kek. I meant actual production servers, not the anime-filled NAS with two VMs for 1337 h4xx0ring and and an old laptop with ratbox for your mumorpuger buddies.
>muh powerful rpm that still routinely gets dephell with every manager
I hope they pay you for your clumsy shilling at least.

What argument that is wrong, imbecile? Nobody claimed that backports provide more different software.
>literally arguing with himself

Dis desu

lmao boomerposting

You run Arch for production? What did you do to even set that up?

>The stability of Debian with AUR ...
Now tell me, what's the reason why people love the AUR?

>The stability of Debian with AUR
That is literally Debian that has more packages in official repos than there are in AUR. Not to mention everyone and their mom packages their soft for deb, while archtoddlers struggle to maintain their beloved garbage heap.
>why people love the AUR
„People“ don‘t love the AUR. Autistic children love it because they know no better.

>that has more packages in official repos than there are in AUR
That's just because Debian knows how to split packages. It doesn't have more software.
>everyone and their mom packages their soft for deb
Not true.
>Autistic children love it because they know no better.
Yeah, but that's also irrelevant. I'm not here to claim that Arch isn't garbage.

> oy vey goyim don't complicate things, just give me money!

Attached: (((oy-vey))).png (144x151, 11K)