Why hasn't anyone made Linux more visually appealing?
Why hasn't anyone made Linux more visually appealing?
Lincoln Jenkins
Aiden Carter
Because it's up to you the user to do that :)
Michael Robinson
I wish people would spend more time making linux work better but every fucking distro spends have their resources on being sure it looks pretty
Gabriel Kelly
Alexander Adams
Minimalism is visually appealing.
Ian Perez
because "visually appealing" is irrelevant to efficiency and workflow. a computer is a tool, not showcase for your quirky personality
Lincoln Parker
Can't see anything that looks better than a tiling WM with no gaps and thin window borders
Austin Ross
Because Linux is a kernel you dumb nigger
Jaxon Smith
Instead of caring about visuals we should focus on the actual LINUX KERNEL, not GNU/Linux, if people really want they can just begin contributing to kde and wayland or some shit, but the real problem is the kernel. The kernel is bloated, it's got a lot of driver issues etc, it's a complete mess, if I were Linus I would just kill myself and delete the whole Linux project and let someone else recreate it better
Jose King
They're too busy reinventing the wheel.
Noah White
Kde exists.
Elijah Ward
There are plenty of great looking distros that look good out of the box. This is a troll thread though so idk why I'm replying.
No one who's not shitposting would post retard-chan and expect to be taken seriously.
Daniel Young
faggot
Eli White
B A S E D
Linux is for retards who think they are smart
Hunter Mitchell
Depends on what your definition of appealing is
Grayson Lewis
very rude
Ryan Gutierrez
Linux is a kernel. It is used in operating systems. It contains nothing that could be made visually appealing.
Tyler Johnson
Nigga, haven't you seen the desktop threads?
Owen Lopez
i wonder what it's like to have a double digit IQ and unironically think you're smarter than other people
Brayden Hill
sorry user
Lincoln Rivera
don't you freetards have an open source project to contribute to for free?
Zachary Morales
cuck you.
Anthony Martinez
Ubuntu looks beautiful out the box imo.
Zachary Bell
I think you overestimate how much effort is put into a majority of these distros.
Hudson Moore
90% are straight up derivatives and rebrands.
You can basically make any distro any other distro with some theme changes, icon packs and a few logo svgs.
Ryder Butler
Debian doesn't do this at all, the stock install is butt fucking ugly no matter what DE you pick on installation.
This is more a matter of DE and WM developers having no aesthetic taste and being unable to ship with a set of sane defaults that look good.
Kayden Morales
Tfw no mention of pop os or enlightenment os
Cooper Lopez
who that?
Leo Smith
Fedora pays more attention to having shit work.
Thomas Moore
using linux means you're retard LOL
Jayden Rodriguez
>Why hasn't anyone made this kernel more visually appealing?
fixed
Henry Perez
I know a lot of people are not keen on it but I think the Solus 4 theme is really cool looking overall. Other than that, whether it's Debian, Arch, Void, etc, the DE you install always looks like shit because you're supposed to make it look good. Linux should never appeal to casuals, Ubuntu already does that and its quality has been gone to shit in the later years.
Tyler Young
Because it's free. Making it visually appealing is the most expensive and time consuming part.
Henry Turner
rice
Henry Thomas
What's a Linux? And have you tried doing any customization yourself or..?