Are snaps really better than apt?

Are snaps really better than apt?

Attached: index.png (286x176, 4K)

No they are a terrible idea.

Retina Macbook Pro doesn't have this problem

>snap browser needs 10 seconds to open. normal Firefox needs less than 1 second to open
>sneaky background update
Garbage. It's useful but Appimage is better in almost any scenario.

It's difficult to completely purge all snap data.

No, but apt is also garbage.

What do you use then, pacman?

Should have said arr snaps better than a good repository.
The answer is yes.
Snaps seem to allow a dev to forego a lot of distro specific idiosyncrasies sure, but a lot of those are to maintain quality and usability of programs im thr distros ecosystem. Therefore, i think Snaps enable devs to produce shit programs.
And if your dustro runs the snap software, theres an almost definite probability that you can just as easily build from source.

>Implying that there is any actual difference between package managers

There's indeed little difference, but apt is one of those few that still can't solve dependencies for shit in 2019