Freetards btfo

digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/freetardism.html
how can freetards refute?

Attached: stallman.jpg (915x590, 68K)

oh no, richard faggotman brutally raped again

Attached: a09.png (680x708, 387K)

>t. palememe slackware novice who complains about lack of flash support
This retard can only dig himself deeper into schizophrenia.

>digdeeper
So it's an article full of autistic nitpicking, blatant bias and superficial knowledge.
I only skimmed through the first paragraphs and I already noticed that he never read a license agreement in his entire life. Also it's funny how he discards open source code as being borderline impossible to change
>f a person wanted to modify Mozilla Firefox [...], they would have to have enough programming skill first. Then they would have to have the patience to wade through thousands of lines of code, find whatever is bothering them, and spend time trying to fix it. And when they are done, they might notice that a new version of Firefox came out with a bunch of essential security fixes that they will now have to implement.
yet he thinks reverse engineering software is an easy task and is a valid alternative to change a program to your liking.

>Bro, just use a disassembler to remove the Windows 10 botnet, you don't need the source code.
What a fucking joke.

>You mean that, for all those years I've been using Windows programs, I've been required to communicate with some "entities"?
The guy is literally retarded. Does it get triple digit IQ or should I stop reading now?
Not like I was expecting anything from kids LARPing as mega hackers, which is obvious from the website.

>Does it get triple digit IQ or should I stop reading now?
Never read one of his articles in its entirety. It's not worth it.

its like theres far too fucking few forks of firefox for his fancy

This reads like a parody.
This IS a parody, right?

tldr but LibreOffice Calc sure is terrible like holy shit

Attached: 1555063886458.png (1010x980, 257K)