How intelligent is /G?

Discuss.

Attached: problem solving.png (1272x2096, 1.04M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand's_box_paradox
test.mensa.no/
pastebin.com/mvzQa4wE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Why do people keep pretending to think it's not 2/3? It's not funny or original or even decent bait. Fuck you.

there are 3 boxes, each box contains N balls.
one box contains N gold balls, another box contains N silver balls, and the final box contains one gold ball and N-1 silver balls

probability of picking golden ball from box one is 1/3
probability of picking golden ball from box final is (1/3)*(1/N)

if you picked from box one, there is 100% change to pick golden ball as next
if you picked from box final, there is 0% chance to pick golden ball as next

this the chance of next ball being golden is (1/3)/((1/3) + ((1/3)*(1/N))) = N/(N+1)
obviously it should diverge to plus infinity for N going to infinity, which this does

let N := 2 then chance is 2/3

>/G

>option 1 has 2x probability
>option 2 has 1x probability
>???
>50%

>i.e.
>99.9% chance to lose the lottery
>0.1% chance to win
>2 different outcomes
>50%

Exactly, the question is asking how many different outcomes there are, and there are 2 i.e. 50%, it's not asking your chance of winning/losing the lottery like the 66% brainlets shill

Bayes rule

>There are three boxes, each with one drawer on each of two sides. Each drawer contains a coin. One box has a gold coin on each side (GG), one a silver coin on each side (SS), and the other a gold coin on one side and a silver coin on the other (GS). A box is chosen at random, a random drawer is opened, and a gold coin is found inside it. What is the chance of the coin on the other side being gold?
>It may seem that the probability that the remaining coin is gold is 1/2, but in truth, the probability is actually 2/3.
People who continue to insist that the answer is 50% after being proven wrong have brain damage.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand's_box_paradox

test.mensa.no/

I scored 147 on that test last time I did it. What's your point?

Your IQ lies outside the area that the test is able to measure. We are hoping to extend this area as soon as we have gathered more data. Remember that it is a good idea to practice tests such as this - there are many others available online.
I also completed the test within 10 seconds
SUCK IT!

OVER 9000

>tfw only 140 brainlet
>predestined to only be a code monkey

Attached: test_mensa_no.png (1000x671, 37K)

>Your IQ lies outside the area that the test is able to measure

Attached: wojak_03.nocrop.w710.h2147483647.jpg (710x512, 125K)

import random

boxes = [["gold", "gold"],
["gold", "silver"],
["silver", "silver"]]

gold_success = 0
gold_attempts = 0

for r in range(1000):
box = random.choice(boxes).copy()
random.shuffle(box)
# Items in box is shuffled. "randomly" take the first one
first = box[0]
if first is not "gold":
continue # We're not looking for this.

second = box[1]
if second is "gold":
gold_success += 1

gold_attempts += 1

probability = gold_success/gold_attempts

print(f"{gold_success} balls were gold after {gold_attempts} attempts.")
print(f"{probability} success rate")


$ python3 probable.py
345 balls were gold after 508 attempts.
0.6791338582677166 success rate


Looks 2/3 to me, mate.

tried to click random answers and ranked 97
seems pretty scary desu

>flippant use of 'continue'
>list within a list
>that fucking print notation

jesus christ

What's the issue with any of that?

is this legit or meme?

Attached: idk.png (691x418, 16K)

lol

Well at least I'm not getting both older and retarded.

Attached: s.png (652x404, 14K)

But you are getting older and you're borderline retarded.

that's exactly what i got but i'm also drunk and it's a meme test

>tfw keep getting 121
what the fuck I'm in one of the best universities in the country doing a stem subject with 20% graduation rate, I can't be this fucking stupid

Attached: 1523509782672.jpg (236x231, 11K)

IQ is not a measure of intelligence. Don't dwell on it user, if you manage to graduate you will have a good job.

I'm nowhere near being that high, I'm fucking retarded.

Attached: dumbIQtest.png (740x513, 32K)

The question is badly worded, it tries to make you believe the choice is the box, but in reality the choice is the coin. There are three possible coins it can be, and 2 of them result in the next coin being gold, and one of them result in the next coin being silver. so its 2 out of a total of 3 possibilities.

>Coins
It's balls, you dumb kike

1/3 of the boxes have 2 gold balls, so 1/3

The reason it's not 1/3 is because of pretentious math faggotry

121 isn't stupid. It's like saying 5'8" is manlet tier, it's not.

>test.mensa.no/
fake and gay

Woah, based

fuck
well at least it's finally confirmed i'm a fucking brainlet. I didn't even bother with the last 15% and just clicked on random because my brainlet head started to ache

Attached: brainlet ultimate.png (3091x1740, 173K)

>not even 130
might as well kill yourself

>might as well kill yourself
despite a shit brain i was blessed with okay looks and okay social skills, so I'll manage

Attached: 1503768443067.jpg (1004x1024, 86K)

retard

but you are given you already took a gold ball so it's 2/3. the probability of this happening from the very start it's 1/3

How has nobody realised this is bullshit? If everyone is above average then nobody is. A real iq test can't be conducted online, and these preliminary tests aren't actual iq tests.
t. Actual 130±7iq, tested by WAIS.
50%.

133 IQ, 50% is correct

The Monty Hall Problem is 2/3.

The answer is 2/3. I wrote a script that proves this: pastebin.com/mvzQa4wE

>inb4 somebody says it's malware

>list within a list
It's called a two dimensional array, but I bet you've never programmed anything more complicated than fizzbuzz. Btw, there is nothing wrong with it. The only thing wrong is that he used Python.