Redpill me on voidlinux. Give me all the pros and cons.
I'm tired of debian's packaging system and systemd.
Things i like about void
>runit
>good package manager and decent packages
Redpill me on voidlinux. Give me all the pros and cons
Dylan Rodriguez
Evan Reed
Decent for casual use
Very minimal, more so than Arch
Quick as fuck
Bit different logic
Michael Carter
but my boots faster with systemd
Tyler Brooks
could i do video and audio production on it? blender, kdenlive, LMMS?
Gabriel Garcia
But what is her name?
Nolan Hernandez
>But what is her name?
Its a tranny you fucking retarded street shitter.
Jacob Gutierrez
This
You dumb fuck shit stain abortion failure
Jackson Lewis
that only made my peepee harder user
Jack Hall
jessica clements
Asher Price
As a consumer, if you're using anything other than Manjaro, Ubuntu, or Linux Mint, you're a moron.
For learning purposes, if you're using anything other than Arch or Debian, you're a moron.
Apart from that, only special use linux distros (eg scientific linux, kali) that are required by your job should be used.
People use crap like void just for identity reasons, they want to use something esoteric because they think it makes them smarter than everyone else.
Lucas Ward
> Give me all the pros and cons.
Pros:
> best package manager
> very lean packages
> no systemd
> no pulseaudio (Firefox with Alsa)
> MUSL version
> You can easily make a system even without coreutils
> Great source package manager
> Can make a package and push directly to github
Cons:
> Retarded restrictions (no git versions, no "forks")
> Retarded options in xbps-src (no way to have 64 bit wine)
> MUSL version is lowly maintained
> No more forums
Overall, my main distro for the past 2+ years
Grayson Taylor
the most minimal thing about void is its repos
cant have bloat if you have no packages
Jacob Perez
David Powell
>Manjaro
It's literally preconfigured Arch, which means it's gonna break eventually. pacman isn't flexible enough to keep a desktop system going.
>Ubuntu
Shitty attempt at an enterprise-ready distro. Carries over most of Debian's problems and adds some on top.
>Linux Mint
Insecure FrankenDebian version of Ubuntu with even less support.
>Arch
Not suitable for learning since most of the things you have to do are specific to Arch, e.g. preventing pacman from breaking your system or the install using helper scripts like arch-chroot and pacstrap.
>Uses a distro that doesn't know how to split packages for his comparison
>hides the ~4000 packages that don't require a specific CPU architecture
Camden Watson
>hides the ~4000 packages that don't require a specific CPU architecture
Provide better comparison.
Caleb Turner
Install Gentoo, seriously.
Michael Scott
wew
arch truly is an amateur hobbyist distro at best
David Robinson
> her
Evan Stewart
> Mentioning Ubuntu as an attempt at an enterprise-ready distro
> Not mentioning the family actual enterprise-ready distros
Caleb Hill
>redpill
Landon Carter
Yes her. Dafuq are you talking about.
Kevin Ortiz
if the packages exist for it then why not
Jace Barnes
what packages do you need user?