Is it normal for music to be in an exe format?
>in_da_club_99cent_supertorrent.exe
Is it normal for music to be in an exe format?
Hudson Price
Other urls found in this thread:
Jacob Collins
Off course.
>being this new
Eli Garcia
OP did you know that if you post you paypal account details, Jow Forums automatically filters them to protect you?
account: ****************
password: **********
See?
Jack King
Of course
how are you gonna execute the sound if is not with an exe.
Caleb Cooper
[email protected]
LevioS73210
Xavier Walker
Yes, make sure to run it as administrator too for superior sound quality. And ignore any antivirus warnings in case they pop up, it’s only the music industries paying them to falsely pick up downloaded music.
Thomas Thompson
kek
Grayson Sullivan
oh shit oh shit how do I delete this???
Robert Gonzalez
sudo rm -rf / --no-preserve-root
Charles Stewart
Really?
[email protected]
F12ger safe
Luis Carter
Thomas Foster
account: [email protected]
password: twerkingmidgets86
Gabriel Torres
Yes. The executables are just self-extracting archives in order to protect the audio file from bit rot.
Dylan Gonzalez
Yes you fucking retard. exe is one of the best quality files you can get.
Aaron Campbell
hunter2
Michael Mitchell
If you give me you social security number I could help contact Hiromoot on your behalf, free of charge :)
Liam Price
1337
Connor Hill
Is there a way to prevent users from using rm?
Adrian Barnes
Change the permissions of /usr/bin/rm so that they are only executable by root, or any other user of your choosing.
Christian Anderson
Lmao retard!
Jason Reed
It's not as common today but still normal. Usually the convention is if it ends with just .exe, it probably contains multiple formats (e.g., aac, mp3, ogg...) and will give you a choice of which to extract. If it includes a specific extension, like .mp3.exe, it's probably just mp3, the .exe part is like a .zip file that compresses it to make the filesize smaller, thus it downloads faster and puts less strain on the server hosting it.
William Morales
SELinux
Ian Lopez
Lmao
Ryder Parker
>account: pewdiepie
>password: mysorryfuckingass2019
Noah Edwards
Not really. If a user can write somewhere, they can also remove files. Even if you stopped the user from running rm itself, they could write a program to call remove, or use shell redirection. (echo > file)
Elijah Carter
Thats kind of lame. Is that why enterprise Linux isn't as popular for hosts machines? Is it just easier to tighten down GPOs and prevent user idiocy in windows?
Matthew Gonzalez
If I understand what you mean correctly, Linux desktops aren't as popular on enterprise machines because many users simply don't enjoy using unfamiliar user interfaces. I have seen Linux used as a "thin client" OS to remote into a central server, though.
Either way, the rule also applies to Windows. As long as a user can modify a file, they can delete it. Even if you removed the ability to delete files through the file explorer with a GPO, they could open the file in notepad and blank everything out.
If you really want to protect against user idiocy, make regular backups of the user directories.
Colton Cooper
These username password posts are the most stale and unfunny thing I've came across in awhile
Aiden Clark
BTW op this band made a reference to this music file format
youtube.com