>the most underrated Linux/GNU distro

>zero bloat
>has a gui installer out of the box
>just werks
Why nobody is talking about it?

Attached: tiny-core-linux-7.2.jpg (900x500, 56K)

>Why nobody is talking about it?
>16MB
because it's bloat.
TempleOS can boot with just 2MB of binary

Because people like bloat.

Needs a VM

>gui installer
>not bloat

That bloat is why Linux is compatible with damn near everything.
You can compile your own kernel if you want and remove everything, just don't be surprised when you forgot the networking drivers.

>That bloat is why Linux is compatible with damn near everything.
...and tiny core linux is (also) compatible with everything. It even has the latest wine in it.

It's like Alpine but shitty.

from their home page:
>It is not a complete desktop nor is all hardware completely supported. It represents only the core needed to boot into a very minimal X desktop typically with wired internet access.

Runs on ancient hp thin clients out of the box, it's even not needed to replace 128mb flash with overkill 4gb hdd.

It's just a low IQ alpine

let me guess, it has some memetastic package manager?

I find Puppy Linux to be more usable.

Debian netinstall with JWM nice and cozy.

this

alpine has the greatest power and lowest requirements possible

just use debian netinstall
busybox is annoying for desktop use

not a netfag. I can walk to the library to shitpost on Jow Forums if I need to.

>CorePlus
>(106 MB) CorePlus is an installation image and not the distribution. It is recommended for new users who only have access to a wireless network or who use a non-US keyboard layout. It includes the base Core System and installation tools to provide for the setup with the following options: Choice of 7 Window Managers, Wireless support via many firmware files and ndiswrapper, non-US keyboard support, and a remastering tool.

BLOAT

its ugly af

It predates alpine. Tiny core and Puppy are minimal LIVE distros done right.

Linux is a kernel.

Compatibility is a false ideal.

ur mom is kernul

>no systemd
dropped

I love that package manager.

You have 10 seconds to explain why you not using Tinycore Linux

Attached: tinycore.png (1024x873, 56K)

Can I flash this shit on to a SPI chip and boot from it?

Temple OS can run on real hardware. There are videos of it running on laptop

Because Puppy Linux is better.

*blocks your tiny pah*

Attached: core-5ni1-uefi.jpg (1920x1080, 173K)

>GNU
Get fucked. This is Busybox/Linux, if you insist on that retarded naming scheme.

>this cluttered shit
>usable
>done right
kek

Attached: B L O A T.jpg (1366x768, 84K)

Because it works like shit. You need Ubuntu at minimum to do anything worthwhile.

>Needs a VM

Attached: terry.jpg (1294x478, 69K)

>yet terry used it in a vm while running ubuntu
kek

>just don't be surprised when you forgot the networking drivers.
Please, do not project your own failings on others.

This isn't Jow Forums.