what is a good alternative to gcc?
What is a good alternative to gcc?
Other urls found in this thread:
There isnt one
icc
tcc
clang
It's the default compiler on FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and many other OSes, too, so it's well-supported. It's not GOOD, but it's better than GCC, at least.
openwacom
What's wrong with gcc? How are these alternatives better?
>better than GCC
AHAHAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
musl-gcc
slow as shit, eat huge ram and mainstream
someday i want a full ICC gentoo system
>good alternative
Anal rape.
>better alternative
clang.
>best alternative
VS.
>msvc
>good
kek
Another useless poorfag offers his opinion.
Kek indeed. Kek indeed.
clang is comfy
GCC is broken by design by that fat retard GNUfag did not want companies to use GCC as a compiler back end, so it's explicity designed to be monolithic.
clang
>falling for the llvm meme
oh no no no no n
tcc unironically
based
MSBuild
cc
In my tests, I find GCC produces faster code than either clang or the MS compiler.
I will admit that test was a couple years ago now.
>mainstream
i see your in too sekrit klub
1 poo has been deposited into your loo
compilers are bloat
just rewrite the code into assembly by hand
>not writing it in binary
lmao pleb
>not writing octal opcodes on your self-made arhitecture on a FPGA
pleb
msvc is so good on win, it's way easier to set up and get using than gcc/msys2 whatever
It still holds true today in my experience.
Clang, however, does use less memory, is faster than gcc and produces more useful diagnostics. It's clearly superior to use it as the back end of a syntax checking tool.
But when generating binaries to actually run and ship, gcc is still better.