fuck
why is there just POSIX and Windows
we need something new
Fuck
Ryan Martin
Parker Green
POSIX is a dead meme. Literally ZERO marketshare except for fruit jails.
99% of phones are Linux.
99% of desktops are Windows.
100% of servers are Linux/Windows.
Caleb White
Linux is POSIX-compliant you doof
Cooper Turner
Thomas Clark
No, it absolutely isn't
Ryan Campbell
>we need something new
>implying all OSes are 100% POSIX compliant
Eli Butler
I don't understand this logo. Oxygen with an R?
Isaiah Wilson
I'm working on something new but don't ask me about it.
Luke Walker
Linux is Linux Standard Base compliant.
POSIX was relevant maybe 30 years ago when it had a commanding marketshare and dictated software compatibility, but literally nobody gives a shit about it anymore. It's the LSB/UWP/Win32 era now.
Jordan Foster
Rust?
Asher Brown
You're partly right. Nobody gives a shit about anything except Win32, and nobody ever will.
Brandon Wilson
Depends on what you're running, there are POSIX compliant Linux systems
Ethan Sanchez
No, Redox (reduction-oxidation) and Redox OS. But the logo still doesn't make sense to me.
Julian Campbell
LSB is necessary if you ever want linux servers to communicate with each other in a standardized manner, or Windows servers without breaking.
But yes, on desktops nobody cares about any standard besides Win32.
Adrian Sanders
Name one
Bentley Smith
LSB is stuff like file system layout, nothing to do with servers
Robert Price
EulerOS is not only POSIX-compliant, it's UNIX
Henry Harris
I think he confused LSB with least-significant byte first aka little endian.
Nolan Gutierrez
Daniel Jackson
>extends POSIX
So it's POSIX compliant with extra specifications, thanks for confirming that Linux is POSIX
Jaxson Cook
>we need something new
we really don't
Carson Taylor
Not him, but LSB != POSIX.
Linux is as POSIX as you get it, but stop saying that it is POSIX compliant when there are people in the Linus camp that literally make a point out of Linux not being POSIX.
Adrian Murphy
LSB is not POOSIX.
Hudson Ward
It's POSIX and then some. It's not JUST POSIX, but it is POSIX.
Ryder White
LSB is POONSEX
Leo Reed
it's compatible enough for anyone without terminal autism
Dominic Ward
It's not. It would be more accurate to claim that LSB is SUS. POSIX is basically just a glorified syscall specification.
They are COMPATIBLE, yes. No one disagrees with that. They are not 100% compliant.
Christian Collins
POSIX is a SUS requirement.
Blake Howard
POOSIX is deprecated trash. LSB is the new standard.
iso.org
Joseph Bennett
But Linux is deliberately Non-POSIX in some areas though:
yarchive.net
cs.cmu.edu
grokbase.com
In Torvalds' own words:
>the POSIX standard is technically stupid.
Tyler Hill
>POOSIXJEETS BTFO
Brayden Phillips
applel is keeping it alive
Sebastian Kelly
redox OS a fundamentally different than linux OS is aiming for at least linux compatibility
we dont need something new
Anthony Williams
There's TempleOS you CIA nigger!
Aaron Reed