I'm using it now. I don't get the hate for it, seems pretty chill

because of ad-hom meme hatred of furfags, and the openbsd and adnauseam kerfuffles
fast, light, customizable interface
hundreds of thousands of quality legacy addons nufox will never implement apis for.

Developer disabled AdNauseam because he disagrees with it, so now we know he can't be trusted.

I've been using it since 2016 and I love it. don't care but furry bullshit, Firefox literally full of sjw shit yet you guys still use it.

Too outdated. It was fine when we were still on XUL addons, but the addon ecosystem is too different and diverged now.

>Too outdated

Rumor: "Pale Moon is an obsolete and insecure version of Firefox"

>FALSE

Pale Moon has been on a divergent path with its own code for a long time already. It was a rebuild in 2009, yes. It was a rebuild with minor changes in the Firefox 4.0 era, yes. But we've come a very, very long way since then with an increasing amount of different code being carried over each time it was re-based on later Firefox code. It's a true fork now, building on a completely independent fork of Mozilla code called the Unified XUL Platform (UXP) and has employed rapid development (as opposed to rapid release) to solidify this independent direction with its own focus and attempt at keeping the browser sane, lean, and offering users choice and stability - not corporate strong-arming or gadgeteering.
At the same time, Pale Moon's strong focus on security/privacy and evolving networking standards has added features and kept pace with those developments in other browsers, by e.g. adding TLS 1.3 support the moment it was standardized, by keeping a close eye on encryption and the browser's security by continuing to port or re-implement security fixes that apply to Pale Moon as a browser and the underlying platform. It is neither old nor outdated, it is not a "rebuild" and it does not use obsolete technologies and does not have known security holes or vulnerabilities.

forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=21626

>propaganda
The addons are all outdated friend.

It's okay except when the developer gets his fursuits in a bunch.

Attached: yiffinhell.jpg (254x247, 25K)

>le ecosystem XDDDDDDDD
Just kys if you use more than an ad blocker.

>he doesn't use decentraleyes
>he doesn't use umatrix
>he doesn't block canvas shit
>etc.
This is the power of furfags.

>canvas.poisondata
I genuinely did not know palemoon had that. That's pretty good.

>the rest exist
They do, but they're on ancient versions.

I've never used uMatrix but I've heard of this spin-off addons.palemoon.org/addon/ematrix/

Firefox using Jow Forums Anons who didn't move to PM immediately when XUL was canned are fucking rubes. It was obvious the direction things were going.

>Upset that a furry browser has working addons.

>>canvas.poisondata
>I genuinely did not know palemoon had that. That's pretty good.
Turning it on makes you MORE unique, not less. So no, it's pretty bad.

It doesn't just fake all canvas input?

>decentraleyes
it's avaiable
>umatrix
it's avaiable
>canvas shit
hmm, not familiar with this one.

Pentadactyl is still the best web browser UI in existence and Pale Moon is the best browser that supports it. That alone is enough to make me use it.

Canvas is html crap that everyone should be faking output to otherwise your privacy will be wrecked. Palemoon has a canvas.poisondata option. The name makes me think it fakes canvas output, but if it simply blocks it then this user is right.

Tridactyl is better now desu

I use pale meme because of this

Attached: Untitled.png (782x504, 18K)

WEEBS DESTROYED

Attached: 370.jpg (700x456, 65K)

What is this shit even useful for, aside from downloading permavirgin porn on exhentai?

user is wrong. It spoofs a new fingerprint with every reload.

>Tridactyl is better now desu
Not even close. It is barely usable for interaction with web pages. However, it has next to no ability to access any browser settings or other non-content stuff, it only works on fully loaded pages (and not while it's loading or on browser UI), it doesn't support proper insert/edit mode bindings, it can't override native browser bindings, the command line is extremely slow and doesn't buffer input, can't use counts before actions, etc.
Qutebrowser is the closest thing we have to Pentadactyl, but it doesn't have real adblockers, which is a deal breaker for me. Tridactyl makes FF almost usable for navigation within web pages, but it's quite shitty in comparison with proper Vim-style UX, since it's barely more than a userscript.

Using installnative restores a lot of that functionality (but admittedly not all) for me. Dunno it works good enough and isn't abandonware.