Intcels in full damage control
techspot.com
Intcels in full damage control
Other urls found in this thread:
tomshardware.com
amazon.com
hardocp.com
pcgamer.com
twitter.com
>navi is a huge flop
>zen2 is a huge flop too, can barely keep up with 14nm+++++++ housefires from intel
the absolute STATE of amd
>The 12-core outperformed these five benchmark runs by an average of 5.2%, a much more realistic number.
How do ayymd fanbois get so deluded
Have any new consumer CPUs come out that don't have any hardware-based exploits?
We got too cocky amdbros ...
>The only thing we can really extrapolate on is the fact that Zen 2 processors with eight or fewer cores will not incur the latency penalty associated with the multiple CCX die configuration used in Zen.
Whoever wrote this is not nearly as informed as he wants to seem. The new dies are referred to as core complex dies (ccds) and the commen expectation is that each one contains two zen2 ccxs. We have no idea how the inter core cluster communication works but there's nothing to say that it will be much different from before. Anyway recent testing implies that it's not intercore communication that's slow but when a core looks outside it's L3 it's going straight to ram instead of snooping various other ccx's l3, even on single die ryzens.
In the end his opinion piece isn't that wrong, we still don't know where the improved performance from ryzen3000 will come from, how much the clock speed is up and/or ipc improvements but ipc is affected by different programs so it's hardly a singular value.
>Opinion:
Stopped reading right there. Anyways, some faggots with Rome samples have already confirmed ~12% IPC increase.
Moore's Law is dead, we're all fucked. Engage the alarm.
which means negative -12% in games
the only relevant metric for home computers today
lol