Mfw the only argument freetards can make against vivaldi is "muh botnet"

Tell me, is Vivaldi capable of downloading this image with ease?
With firefox I just right click the image, and can download it.

Not safe for work: waffle1999.com/game/81kanojo/index.html

Attached: 4.jpg (1436x878, 472K)

I downloaded it and it looked nice and all but man... It felt like my internet was shit with all that slow browsing it has. What is the point of changing browsers if the one your are getting new takes more than 1 sec to fully load a webpage?

user, can you do this test for me?

I suspect Vivaldi can't save that image, since it's based on Chromium.

Can't you just right-mouse > "inspect" and find the address for the image itself?

>"inspect" and find the address for the image itself?
That's unintuitive.

Be honest, can you do that in less than 5 seconds?

probably in 15

I can't my dude, already uninstalled it

Then what if the domain has 10 such images?

Do you see now why I need that shitty Firefox feature?
Too bad no other browser can download this thing fast.

Attached: 1.png (2425x1170, 825K)

Then write a python scraper code or download a browser that you only use for ripping those images. What you have is a very specific requirement, and it's not unusual for it not to be included in all browsers.

>What you have is a very specific requirement, and it's not unusual for it not to be included in all browsers.
Saving an image from a website is some of the most basic shit since forever.

It's just that only Firefox ever managed to do it right.

>>What you have is a very specific requirement, and it's not unusual for it not to be included in all browsers.
>Saving an image from a website is some of the most basic shit since forever.
And Vivaldi can save an image from nearly any site. By "a very specific requirement" I meant saving an image from the few sources where most browsers cannot.

>I meant saving an image from the few sources where most browsers cannot.
My argument is your browser is broken and was never truly capable of this basic feature.

it's just fucking chromium but proprietary like chrome
retards

>another custom wrapper around blink
Might as well use Google Chrome, faggot. Use an independent engine or go home.

>probably in 15
So did you do the test yet?

My guess is you probably took more than 30 seconds.

No I'm at school

I can do in give or take 5 secs
Using Inspect highlights exactly where the image URL is and after that it's just a right click and open in new tab

>Using Inspect highlights exactly where the image URL is
Sometimes you only get a partial url.

Try it, and report back, how many minutes did it take you to save that image.

The whole URL is there it's just truncated
You can right click the partial URL and send it to a new tab

Attached: inspect tiddies.png (1912x922, 1.93M)

The browser lead me to the wrong background.
Now what?

Attached: 1.png (624x147, 31K)

Anyway. I'm not convinced, because
1. it shouldn't be this hard to save an image.
2. other websites are even less simple than this one and will have more tricky overlays which will trick your point and click inspection.

>"muh botnet"
What do you even have to hide anyway?

Attached: 1556420896480.png (826x826, 232K)

>I had to download an extension to make videos not autoplay, which was a bitch.
what

That's a privacy + security thing.

Flash, silverlight, and Java should always need your permission to initiate.
Or else they can be used to probe and track you.

Been using memevaldi for about a year. It okei but I do have some pet peeves:
-it doesn't sync everything, even when you select it.
-theme customization often makes UI text unreadable and since there's a gorillion customization options you spend half an hour fixing it
-it usually makes stupid decisions for download locations and you have to go out of your way to make it not stupid in the settings
-all these bars surrounding your content, and you can't condense all (or most) of the buttons displayed on them in a single bar
-The unelievably fuckin retarded update windows forcing you to waste a good 2 minutes every time a new one comes out

Still better than firefox tho

Could say the same about China, aside from its problems it's amazing, retard

It only feels like instantly because you haven't compared it to anything else

So what browser is capable of this?

I think it's unfair to test this kind of things on sites that do not want you to download the images.

vivaldi is pretty good but the severe privacy issues render it unusable in my eyes

It is fucking buggy. Every release they fix an old one and introduce a new one and you have to change your behavior around it. And they URL bar ignores the hash if you change it and just goes to a previous URL. And you still can't expand tab stacks.

It's in the main bracket.

Attached: main body.jpg (1717x935, 398K)

>will have more tricky overlays which will trick your point and click inspection
Then in that case your standard "right click + view background image" from firefox isn't going to work either you numbnuts

>the only argument is an absolute killer argument
what did the shill mean by this?

Attached: 123546432431.jpg (400x400, 29K)

correction surf is the best browser

Firefox.

Sometimes it will. It's easier to pinpoint a new corner or edge with the background, and view it, and it takes a split second to figure out if it's the right one, etc.

Obviously you use DownThemAOH WAIT THEY BROKE THAT.

There's an extension for that.

And what is its name?